Braking distances 40 years out of date?
Braking distances 40 years out of date?
Author
Discussion

TVR keith

Original Poster:

1,913 posts

252 months

Thursday 26th October 2006
quotequote all
Why does the Highway Code/"Safety camera Partnerships" etc still pubicise braking distances that are about 40 years out of date.
There have been huge reductions in a cars ability to stop over this time, better tyres, brakes, suspension etc even if we are still driving on the same (rather worn out) tarmac.
Yes I know about the thinking distance which will not change that is not the point I am making.
Is it politically incorrect for these departments to accept that even the cheapest car today has substantially better sopping ability than a high performance car from the 1960's.

PS I may be wrong about the 40 years, I only started driving in 1970 and maybe the figures were arrived at in the 1950's using a sidevalve Ford with cable brakes!

cptsideways

13,887 posts

282 months

Thursday 26th October 2006
quotequote all
Ive collated data on multiple occasions using data logging, with various cars, your average numpty car without ABS is just about spot on to the highway code fugures. Yes some high performance cars are better by quite a long way but many many cars are quite franky not.

One new technology that does definately decrease stopping distances for Mr Average driver who still does'nt know how to operate an ABS equipped car, is brake assist, its quite staggering just how good it is. Alas it's only fitted to largeer modern high spec cars, though does appear on some repmobiles like the Mondeo.

The reaction times are correct, but if you'd seen the data that Toyota did a few years ago that found a vast percentage of drivers dont brake when they could have done. Panic reactions are far more of a worry to me than the HWC data.

TVR keith

Original Poster:

1,913 posts

252 months

Thursday 26th October 2006
quotequote all
Such as the panic reactions of drivers who see a speed camera and brake sharply even though they are withion the speed limit?

7db

6,060 posts

260 months

Thursday 26th October 2006
quotequote all
Be nice if people took some notice of the published thinking and stopping distances.

TVR keith

Original Poster:

1,913 posts

252 months

Thursday 26th October 2006
quotequote all
Don't get me wrong, I would be greatful if some people would just drive behind me allowing themselves the "thinking" distance, that would be a start.

herewego

8,814 posts

243 months

Thursday 26th October 2006
quotequote all
cptsideways said:
Ive collated data on multiple occasions using data logging, with various cars, your average numpty car without ABS is just about spot on to the highway code fugures. Yes some high performance cars are better by quite a long way but many many cars are quite franky not.

One new technology that does definately decrease stopping distances for Mr Average driver who still does'nt know how to operate an ABS equipped car, is brake assist, its quite staggering just how good it is. Alas it's only fitted to largeer modern high spec cars, though does appear on some repmobiles like the Mondeo.

The reaction times are correct, but if you'd seen the data that Toyota did a few years ago that found a vast percentage of drivers dont brake when they could have done. Panic reactions are far more of a worry to me than the HWC data.

I hesitate to ask this, but err, how do you operate an ABS equipped car?

porkbrain

406 posts

267 months

Thursday 26th October 2006
quotequote all
cptsideways said:
One new technology that does definately decrease stopping distances for Mr Average driver who still does'nt know how to operate an ABS equipped car, is brake assist, its quite staggering just how good it is. Alas it's only fitted to largeer modern high spec cars, though does appear on some repmobiles like the Mondeo.


Not just larger cars, my Smartie has it as standard and bloody hell it does stop in a remarkably short distance.
I was cut up by a car and applied 'normal' emergency braking shove to the brake pedal at 30mph.
Weird - one second moving, the next stopped with no drama. Though no doubt if there had been a numpty behind I'd have been rear-ended.

superlightr

12,920 posts

293 months

Thursday 26th October 2006
quotequote all
Didnt think ABS would stop you much/if any quicker than full lockup. It does enable braking and some stearing which full lockup does not.

Tyres only have a certain level of grip, they use up their 'points' cornering and or braking but cant exceed their grip level points. if you are stearing you are already using up some of the grip points. hence brake in a straight line.

tvrgit

8,490 posts

282 months

Thursday 26th October 2006
quotequote all
superlightr said:
Didnt think ABS would stop you much/if any quicker than full lockup.

On a dry road, maybe yes. On anything else (apart from deep snow), no.

Zod

35,295 posts

288 months

Thursday 26th October 2006
quotequote all
cptsideways said:
Ive collated data on multiple occasions using data logging, with various cars, your average numpty car without ABS is just about spot on to the highway code fugures.
Are there any cars now on the market without ABS?

Rob_the_Sparky

1,000 posts

268 months

Thursday 26th October 2006
quotequote all
You stop significantly quicker if you do not lock up and I guess it will depend on how good the ABS system in question is whether it will stop you quicker or not. Some of the older ones were quite crude but I suspect a modern system would stop you significantly quicker than locking up.

Rob

bluepolarbear

1,666 posts

276 months

Thursday 26th October 2006
quotequote all
Modern ABS outperforms manual breaking in the real world as it can optimise the breaking on each wheel for the level of grip at that split second, something two feet and one pedal can not do.

The biggest "issue" with ABS and to be fair non-abs cars to a degree is that people just don't break hard enough. On an ABS car you have to stand on your brakes, attempt to the push the pedal through floor, do not release pedal pressure until the car is stopped. The average driver will not apply enough pressure to the brake pedal (ABS or otherwise) or will release it when the feel the ABS "pulsing" the brake pedal. That is why brake assist as such good real world results as it applies maxium "pressure" throughout the stopping period.

Emergency braking is violent, seat belts should lock up, your passenger should be bracing themselves. It should be compulsary to do an emergency stop from 70 and not the 20 that you currently do. If you haven't done it, you should try, it isn't hairy but you need to realise what full braking is all about.

allaway

353 posts

252 months

Thursday 26th October 2006
quotequote all
The emergency stop is not compulsory on a driving test anymore.

dcb

6,068 posts

295 months

Thursday 26th October 2006
quotequote all
TVR keith said:
Why does the Highway Code/"Safety camera Partnerships" etc still pubicise braking distances that are about 40 years out of date.


Because they can't cope with change.

I've got some real world numbers in front of me
from Road and Track magazine. Over 100 different
cars sampled from Porsches to Ford.

Stopping distances from 60 mph range from 107 feet to
157 feet.

Stopping distances from 80 mph range from 184 feet to
285 feet.

This makes the claim of 310 feet from 70 mph by the
highway code look a bit silly.

Oh well, what's new - unrealistic Government numbers.
I think I'll investigate the Pope's religious affiliation next.

jatinder

1,667 posts

243 months

Thursday 26th October 2006
quotequote all
Didnt top gear test this theory out, I cannot remmeber what happened but it certainly showed that the stopping distances were out of date.

cptsideways

13,887 posts

282 months

Thursday 26th October 2006
quotequote all
herewego said:
cptsideways said:

One new technology that does definately decrease stopping distances for Mr Average driver who still does'nt know how to operate an ABS equipped car, is brake assist, its quite staggering just how good it is. Alas it's only fitted to largeer modern high spec cars, though does appear on some repmobiles like the Mondeo.

I hesitate to ask this, but err, how do you operate an ABS equipped car?


Don't lift off at all, maintain full hard brake pressure, "most" drivers release the brake when they sense the pulsing effect through the pedal further increasing the stopping distance. This is why Brake Assist was invented.

Note: Brake assist cars actually sense the speed at which you apply the pedal Ie initial travel speed not pressure. The system can be set off by simply tapping the pedal. It remains at full brake pressure until the pedal is released.

The Hitman

2,592 posts

240 months

Thursday 26th October 2006
quotequote all
Zod said:
cptsideways said:
Ive collated data on multiple occasions using data logging, with various cars, your average numpty car without ABS is just about spot on to the highway code fugures.
Are there any cars now on the market without ABS?


All new cars sold have to have ABS fitted as standard as they are so effective.

bluepolarbear

1,666 posts

276 months

Thursday 26th October 2006
quotequote all
allaway said:
The emergency stop is not compulsory on a driving test anymore.


eek

BonzoGuinness

1,554 posts

244 months

Friday 27th October 2006
quotequote all
bluepolarbear said:
allaway said:
The emergency stop is not compulsory on a driving test anymore.


eek


I believe 1/3rd of examinees on any given day are randomly chosen to perform the emergency stop - I got one on my test in February, yet know plenty of people who didn't get one.

7db

6,060 posts

260 months

Friday 27th October 2006
quotequote all
The Hitman said:
Zod said:
cptsideways said:
Ive collated data on multiple occasions using data logging, with various cars, your average numpty car without ABS is just about spot on to the highway code fugures.
Are there any cars now on the market without ABS?


All new cars sold have to have ABS fitted as standard as they are so effective.


No they don't.