NIP - £60+3 points, court to dispute, or £60+speed seminar?
NIP - £60+3 points, court to dispute, or £60+speed seminar?
Author
Discussion

virgil

Original Poster:

1,557 posts

254 months

Thursday 16th November 2006
quotequote all
Heard last night that a good friend's Dad has just been Gatsoed and offered 3 options after completing the NIP in his name...

1 - £60 fine and attend a speed awareness course
2 - £60 fine and 3 points
3 - go to court to argue.


Any one heard of number 1 before? And when is this used?

Guess which one he is going for?

Virgil.

IT10

602 posts

245 months

Thursday 16th November 2006
quotequote all
If he has been offered the course, take it! It avoids the points
(There may be a slight additional charge fo rthe course, but IMO that charge is still better than points. Whether it is in this case is up to the individual concerned.)

As I understand it, the courses are offered only when the 'victim' (for want of a better word) is within a very narrow range over the limit.

tigger1

8,476 posts

251 months

Thursday 16th November 2006
quotequote all
If he goes on hte course he'll have to nod and agree that he's been a very naughty boy and no doubt killed thousands of children in the process.

He'll not be allowed to voice his opinion on speed being ok in certain circumstances, and he'll have to sit in a room and be talked at by a sandal wearing "brake" type spouting rubbish.

However, it would avoid the points, although I think he'd have to declare to insurance company still.

I'd do the course, and sit on my hands - but I'd be tempted to take the points instead, dependent on the difference in insurance quotes...

stevieb

5,253 posts

297 months

Thursday 16th November 2006
quotequote all
You will have to declare the conviction but with no points, so they will not load your policy unless the conviction is a listed SP30 offence

Dwight VanDriver

6,583 posts

274 months

Thursday 16th November 2006
quotequote all
Pppssstttttt Virgil. Look here:

www.tinyurl.com/zvkff

dvd

Edited by Dwight VanDriver on Thursday 16th November 15:49

grahamn

1,777 posts

264 months

Thursday 16th November 2006
quotequote all
The Thames Valley Police will offer you the course if you are within 20% of the speed limit and you have not done the course before.

I did the course after being done for 36 in a 30.

havoc

33,482 posts

265 months

Thursday 16th November 2006
quotequote all
tigger1 said:
I'd do the course, and sit on my hands.

I'm not sure I COULD take the course and keep my mouth shut.

What happens if you take the course, take along a bunch of useful stats from SS and the gov'ts latest stats, and argue the toss with them?!? hehe

(Seriously...could they still hit you with the SP30?...because if not, that would be worth the extra cost of the course...they try and tell you it's bad, you trot out the gov'ts latest 5% stat and ask them how bad it can be compared to all the other causes!)

eccles

14,401 posts

252 months

Thursday 16th November 2006
quotequote all
is it possible to fail the course?.....

jasandjules

72,630 posts

259 months

Thursday 16th November 2006
quotequote all
eccles said:
is it possible to fail the course?.....


See the above, Tell the Truth about 5% of accidents are caused by speeding.
I suspect, the truth is a fail option.

defblade

8,075 posts

243 months

Friday 17th November 2006
quotequote all
That's a funny document.

"...we could lose vital general public support for remote camera enforcement, something we currently have."
Which world is that in??

The course itself, to pass drivers have to "demonstrate a willingness to make a commitment to improve speed awareness skills and attitudes". Which is meaningless bollox. I assume that by "improve" and "attitudes" they mean "stay under the posted limit" but that's not what it says........

andy zarse

10,870 posts

277 months

Friday 17th November 2006
quotequote all
I would take the points and elect to attend their wretched course. You should make a point of arguing with everything the course leader has to say, generally be a blessed nuisance and disruptive and subversive element. I'll guarantee there are other folk on the course who'll join in with you and gang up against the "teacher". Hopefully he'll be like the "spanner teacher" we all had at school and who's daily life was made a misery by the naughty horrid little children. It'll be terrific fun!

andmole

1,594 posts

241 months

Friday 17th November 2006
quotequote all
andy zarse said:
I would take the points and elect to attend their wretched course. You should make a point of arguing with everything the course leader has to say, generally be a blessed nuisance and disruptive and subversive element. I'll guarantee there are other folk on the course who'll join in with you and gang up against the "teacher". Hopefully he'll be like the "spanner teacher" we all had at school and who's daily life was made a misery by the naughty horrid little children. It'll be terrific fun!


You were obviously the sort of child at school who would have benefited from a swift clip round the ear!

virgil

Original Poster:

1,557 posts

254 months

Monday 20th November 2006
quotequote all
Yeah, he's taking the course - has the time so an obvious choice. He's also not the kind of person who would deliberately wind up the teacher, sorry to say

Cheers for the doc DVD...an interesting read...