tracing a scrote
Discussion
ooooh what a novel idea,ask the police,they are as usefull as a chocolate teapot,i found out their names with about 10 mins of my time and 1 phone call.
they are of the chav/pikey flavor so finding an addy may be difficult and the vehicle they use prob isn't registered anywhere.
where,s the A team when you need them?
they are of the chav/pikey flavor so finding an addy may be difficult and the vehicle they use prob isn't registered anywhere.
where,s the A team when you need them?
theconrodkid said:
ooooh what a novel idea,ask the police,they are as usefull as a chocolate teapot,i found out their names with about 10 mins of my time and 1 phone call.
they are of the chav/pikey flavor so finding an addy may be difficult and the vehicle they use prob isn't registered anywhere.
where,s the A team when you need them?
they are of the chav/pikey flavor so finding an addy may be difficult and the vehicle they use prob isn't registered anywhere.
where,s the A team when you need them?
Have you tried the Police ?
When you say you know who did it, is that under your own rules of evidence or those that would satisfy a court ?
theconrodkid said:
all the "evidence" i have is the time the theft occurred a neighbor heard a lot of noise from near my garden,the same time as said scrotes family were moving out.
one of scrotes is into scrap metal.
2+2 =4 in my book but would plod bother on that evidence?
one of scrotes is into scrap metal.
2+2 =4 in my book but would plod bother on that evidence?
Without an admission from them, that is insufficient evidence.
The law that protects you by requiring any allegation made against you be proveable beyond all reasonable doubt, protects them.
www.b4usearch.com/
Find anyone, being updated at the moment but its a free name search site with some names available
Find anyone, being updated at the moment but its a free name search site with some names available
theconrodkid said:
Without an admission from them, that is insufficient evidence.
The law that protects you by requiring any allegation made against you be proveable beyond all reasonable doubt, protects them.
exactly my point,i know they did it but have no other evidence.plod wouldnt be interested.
The law that protects you by requiring any allegation made against you be proveable beyond all reasonable doubt, protects them.
exactly my point,i know they did it but have no other evidence.plod wouldnt be interested.
But what do you suggest then ?
That it's OK for you to set up your own kangaroo court, that it require a much lower burden of proof & that you should be free to apply it to those who you feel may have personally wronged you ?
But what do you suggest then ?
That it's OK for you to set up your own kangaroo court, that it require a much lower burden of proof & that you should be free to apply it to those who you feel may have personally wronged you ?
isnt "a lower burden of proof" what the scamera,s use?
i have been a victim of crime and plod have no intention of doing anything to help me.
what do you suggest i do,lie down and take it?
That it's OK for you to set up your own kangaroo court, that it require a much lower burden of proof & that you should be free to apply it to those who you feel may have personally wronged you ?
isnt "a lower burden of proof" what the scamera,s use?
i have been a victim of crime and plod have no intention of doing anything to help me.
what do you suggest i do,lie down and take it?
theconrodkid said:
But what do you suggest then ?
That it's OK for you to set up your own kangaroo court, that it require a much lower burden of proof & that you should be free to apply it to those who you feel may have personally wronged you ?
isnt "a lower burden of proof" what the scamera,s use?
i have been a victim of crime and plod have no intention of doing anything to help me.
what do you suggest i do,lie down and take it?
That it's OK for you to set up your own kangaroo court, that it require a much lower burden of proof & that you should be free to apply it to those who you feel may have personally wronged you ?
isnt "a lower burden of proof" what the scamera,s use?
i have been a victim of crime and plod have no intention of doing anything to help me.
what do you suggest i do,lie down and take it?
The burden of proof for speeding offences is beyond all reasonable doubt.
I suggest that you think about carefully before accusing people when you have no evidence & carrying out your own summary justice, lest the same happen to you one day.
Edited by vonhosen on Saturday 20th January 17:47
vonhosen said:
The burden of proof for speeding offences is beyond all reasonable doubt.
Ha! Ha! Ha!
And there I was thinking you were entirely devoid of humour.
(I do agree that the proof against the people in question sounds somewhat less than compelling, though. However, since I don't know ALL the circumstances, I will leave it there.
)
spokey said:
vonhosen said:
The burden of proof for speeding offences is beyond all reasonable doubt.
Ha! Ha! Ha!
And there I was thinking you were entirely devoid of humour.
(I do agree that the proof against the people in question sounds somewhat less than compelling, though. However, since I don't know ALL the circumstances, I will leave it there.
)Actually in Von's defense - he is correct.
The problem is that the evidence the CPS use to prove the "beyond all reasonable doubt" is illegal (in my opinion). If the courts allow the evidence then the case is prooved...
OK - I am ignoring the dodgyscope issues here
Sean
NugentS said:
The problem is that the evidence the CPS use to prove the "beyond all reasonable doubt" is illegal (in my opinion). If the courts allow the evidence then the case is prooved...
OK - I am ignoring the dodgyscope issues here
Sean
OK - I am ignoring the dodgyscope issues here
Sean
Those are all the sort of issues I had in mind.
vonhosen said:
That it's OK for you to set up your own kangaroo court, that it require a much lower burden of proof & that you should be free to apply it to those who you feel may have personally wronged you ?
Well who is going to do it?
Who is going to investigate the crime of burgulary?
Plod?
The Magistrates?
Don't make me laugh!!
I hope Mr B Ballbat is on the jury of Skippy's court!
Forums | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff