Arghhhhh whats with police shutting roads after accidents ?
Arghhhhh whats with police shutting roads after accidents ?
Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

84 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
Every time i venture out onto our lovely road network I seem to get caught up in Police induced, post accident, congestion. First time they coned off a lane of the A1M while, the motor cyclist, motor bike, car and driver were all on the grass verge, talking. the only thing blocking the road was the damn police car and cones. 1.5 hrs. Yesterday they SHUT the damn M1, FFS, at rush hour!!! what were all 3 lanes + shoulder blocked? i know sensitivities to injured dead etc... but it needs some perspective. 4000 people delayed 4+ hours fuc4ing crazy!!!

esselte

14,626 posts

297 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
fbrs said:
Every time i venture out onto our lovely road network I seem to get caught up in Police induced, post accident, congestion. First time they coned off a lane of the A1M while, the motor cyclist, motor bike, car and driver were all on the grass verge, talking. the only thing blocking the road was the damn police car and cones. 1.5 hrs. Yesterday they SHUT the damn M1, FFS, at rush hour!!! what were all 3 lanes + shoulder blocked? i know sensitivities to injured dead etc... but it needs some perspective. 4000 people delayed 4+ hours fuc4ing crazy!!!

If it's been a "nasty" they view the road as a crime scene and preserve? it for the forensics I think.

muzzer

3,814 posts

251 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
When there's a death involved, don't they need to do forensics and stuff in case of a potential court case?

That and the fact that Twunts on the same carriageway and rubberneckers on the other tend to have further accidents because they're not paying attention on what they're doing rolleyes

Vesuvius 996

35,829 posts

301 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
B0llocks.

They do it to make car use less attractive.


If someone dies on the roads, there is no need to close the road all fcking day. Clear up the mess and open it again as soon aspossible. Life goes on.





Edited by Vesuvius 996 on Thursday 19th April 13:32

justinp1

13,363 posts

260 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
fbrs said:
Every time i venture out onto our lovely road network I seem to get caught up in Police induced, post accident, congestion. First time they coned off a lane of the A1M while, the motor cyclist, motor bike, car and driver were all on the grass verge, talking. the only thing blocking the road was the damn police car and cones. 1.5 hrs. Yesterday they SHUT the damn M1, FFS, at rush hour!!! what were all 3 lanes + shoulder blocked? i know sensitivities to injured dead etc... but it needs some perspective. 4000 people delayed 4+ hours fuc4ing crazy!!!


Possibly so car dont come past at 70 mph within a few feet of people and cars on the hard shoulder, all rubbernecking at the crash. A recipe for disaster that.

silversun

4,373 posts

256 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
Don't the accident investigators have to look at the road if there's been a fatal accident? I thought they had to check for evidence, what caused the accident etc., which might be tricky if there are 4000 cars driving over it.

silversun

4,373 posts

256 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
As a side note, I heard recently that after a fatal motorbike crash on the M25, the police had to not only close the clockwise carriageway at junction 29, but they had to put up a barrier to prevent people rubbernecking from the opposite carriageway and eventually had to confiscate mobile phones after they spotted passersby taking photos of the accident scene with them. There are some sick people out there. Who the hell wants a picture of a dead motorcyclist on their mobile phone?

apache

39,731 posts

314 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
Couple of weekends ago there was a nasty collision on the A505 on the Melbourn bypass. 2 were killed but, the police blocked the road off between the M11 and Royston for a whole day. We're talking about 8 miles of road here people, total overkill.


Edited by apache on Thursday 19th April 13:44

pot bellied fool

2,264 posts

267 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
I don't think it's done lightly. The Police are well aware of the problems with congestion as any extra accidents it causes usually give them extra work.

But if it was me that had been splattered all over the carriageway, I think my ghost would want the Police to make every effort, and have every opportunity, to gather the evidence to convict the numpty that sideswiped me etc.

Or have you a better way?

Peter Ward

2,097 posts

286 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
silversun said:
Who the hell wants a picture of a dead motorcyclist on their mobile phone?

Someone who wants to show their teenagers what can happen if they're not careful?

I don't know. It probably is as you say, but don't the police show books of pics to dangerous drivers to ram home the potential effects?

Plotloss

67,280 posts

300 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
Its so they can all stand around together and moan in peace about being berated on internet forums.

R_U_LOCAL

2,708 posts

238 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
Vesuvius 996 said:

B0llocks.

They do it to make car use less attractive.




You're absolutely correct. For a number of years, there has been a hidden Police agenda to make motoring less attractive. Closing the road after a serious accident has absolutely nothing to do with preserving the scene for evidence, making a safe sterile area in which other emergency services and recovery operators can work safely, checking that the road surface and any under/over bridge structures are safe and preventing any other accidents from occurring.

No - they're closed for the simple single purpose of pissing people off.

I don't know about anyone else, but that's all I joined the Police for.


anonymous-user

Original Poster:

84 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
esselte said:

If it's been a "nasty" they view the road as a crime scene and preserve? it for the forensics I think.


i appreciate the "need"/wish to do that. but at what cost? did they really need the WHOLE M1 routed through milton keynes during rush hour? utter madness. 5 mile stationary tailback = approx 4000 people, 4hours late for work, at very least 200 trucks late delivery, drivers going over hours, missed delivery schedules, assembly lines shut down. meetings cancelled, contracts lost. thats just those on the M1. MK must have been at a complete standstill most of the day. i wonder if the guys shutting the roads have any idea how many £million they just cost the economy?

thinfourth

1,189 posts

251 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
R_U_LOCAL said:
Vesuvius 996 said:

B0llocks.

They do it to make car use less attractive.




You're absolutely correct. For a number of years, there has been a hidden Police agenda to make motoring less attractive. Closing the road after a serious accident has absolutely nothing to do with preserving the scene for evidence, making a safe sterile area in which other emergency services and recovery operators can work safely, checking that the road surface and any under/over bridge structures are safe and preventing any other accidents from occurring.

No - they're closed for the simple single purpose of pissing people off.

I don't know about anyone else, but that's all I joined the Police for.




Ah ha you are a traffic warden

cj_eds

1,567 posts

251 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
silversun said:
As a side note, I heard recently that after a fatal motorbike crash on the M25, the police had to not only close the clockwise carriageway at junction 29, but they had to put up a barrier to prevent people rubbernecking from the opposite carriageway and eventually had to confiscate mobile phones after they spotted passersby taking photos of the accident scene with them. There are some sick people out there. Who the hell wants a picture of a dead motorcyclist on their mobile phone?


Such screens should be standard practice at every incident (once the vital life saving stuff is done first!). It would stop rubbernecking instantly and improve the post-traffic flow. Either that or a second plod car should turn up with a video camera and a week later send out prosecutions for not driving with due care and attention to anyone who's head did a full circle on their neck while applying the brakes.
I'm all for slowing down a little because there is people working at the roadside - akin to roadworks - but stopping dead in the middle of the road to have a good gawp is one of the most annoying things you can experience.

silversun

4,373 posts

256 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
cj_eds said:
Such screens should be standard practice at every incident (once the vital life saving stuff is done first!). It would stop rubbernecking instantly and improve the post-traffic flow. Either that or a second plod car should turn up with a video camera and a week later send out prosecutions for not driving with due care and attention to anyone who's head did a full circle on their neck while applying the brakes.
I'm all for slowing down a little because there is people working at the roadside - akin to roadworks - but stopping dead in the middle of the road to have a good gawp is one of the most annoying things you can experience.


Totally agree. It infuriates me when some cockfarmer in front of me slows to a near halt just so he can get a better look at a couple of ambulances and police cars.


john57

1,870 posts

258 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
R_U_LOCAL said:
Vesuvius 996 said:

B0llocks.

They do it to make car use less attractive.




You're absolutely correct. For a number of years, there has been a hidden Police agenda to make motoring less attractive. Closing the road after a serious accident has absolutely nothing to do with preserving the scene for evidence, making a safe sterile area in which other emergency services and recovery operators can work safely, checking that the road surface and any under/over bridge structures are safe and preventing any other accidents from occurring.

No - they're closed for the simple single purpose of pissing people off.

I don't know about anyone else, but that's all I joined the Police for.


rofl

Edited by john57 on Thursday 19th April 13:47

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

84 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
cj_eds said:
Such screens should be standard practice at every incident


agreed

esselte

14,626 posts

297 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
Idea!
Why not have small vanes , set at an angle ( a bit like a vertical venetian blind but fixed,not moveable)), attached to the top of the central armco at maybe 1' centres.this would stop any rubbernecking from the opposite carriageway and also cut down headlamp glare on rainy nights? Rubbish Idea I suppose.It'll cost too much.


Edited by esselte on Thursday 19th April 13:50

MilnerR

8,273 posts

288 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
Whilst out for a walk over the moors near the cat and fiddle road (Buxton to Macc) my girlfriend and I saw the after affects of a coming together of car and bike. There were a large number of police cars present and eveyone appeared to be doing a very professional job of trying to get everything done that needed to be done as quickly as possible. Even so the road was closed for a number of hours, but I guess the family of the biker under the sheet will at least know the full circumstances of their death.

Then again you're quite right, making you late for a meeting is far more serious than something as petty as a death or serious injury rolleyes