Seatbelts.... But no seats.
Seatbelts.... But no seats.
Author
Discussion

AL666

Original Poster:

2,679 posts

248 months

Tuesday 1st May 2007
quotequote all
If one decided to remove the rear seats from his road car so as to improve its performance on track, or even just to improve fuel economy and such, but was caught off-guard away from home (where his seats are), would he be allowed to carry rear passengers bearing in mind that the seatbelts are still there, and that the rear passengers will be sitting basically where the seats are, but without the padding and comfort of the seats?

Or would it be illegal?


Cheers,


AL

shouldbworking

4,801 posts

242 months

Tuesday 1st May 2007
quotequote all
You anticipate there will be a lot of people interested in a ride in a rover 216 without rear seats?

mattyb123

2,206 posts

240 months

Tuesday 1st May 2007
quotequote all
shouldbworking said:
You anticipate there will be a lot of people interested in a ride in a rover 216 without rear seats?


possibly the funniest thing i have read on here all day!

AL666

Original Poster:

2,679 posts

248 months

Tuesday 1st May 2007
quotequote all
shouldbworking said:
You anticipate there will be a lot of people interested in a ride in a rover 216 without rear seats?


I thought of it as a selling point idea


Has anybody got any constructive answers!? rolleyes

Fidgits

17,202 posts

259 months

Tuesday 1st May 2007
quotequote all
certainly an original question.

Silent1

19,762 posts

265 months

Tuesday 1st May 2007
quotequote all
Why not just fold the seats down, i hear it's just as effective

AL666

Original Poster:

2,679 posts

248 months

Tuesday 1st May 2007
quotequote all
Silent1 said:
Why not just fold the seats down, i hear it's just as effective


hehe it's a (hypothetical) Rover, not a Corsa rolleyes

Cooperman

4,428 posts

280 months

Tuesday 1st May 2007
quotequote all
Now for a constructive answer.
If there are no rear seats you cannot carry passengers in the place where those seats should be. There is some regulation to that effect, although I'm afraid I can't actually quote it.
In my rally Rover 214Si I have had to fold the rear seats flat and the seat belt mountings have had to be removed to allow the roll cage to be fitted. There is always some contention as to whether the car complies with the C & U Regulations although since the seats can't be re-fitted it's never been a problem with MoT or The Old Bill.

mg6b

6,649 posts

293 months

Tuesday 1st May 2007
quotequote all
Cooperman said:
Now for a constructive answer.
If there are no rear seats you cannot carry passengers in the place where those seats should be. There is some regulation to that effect, although I'm afraid I can't actually quote it.
In my rally Rover 214Si I have had to fold the rear seats flat and the seat belt mountings have had to be removed to allow the roll cage to be fitted. There is always some contention as to whether the car complies with the C & U Regulations although since the seats can't be re-fitted it's never been a problem with MoT or The Old Bill.



Regulation 100 Con and Use regs 1978.

Dangerous condition or unsuitable use covers all!!!

AL666

Original Poster:

2,679 posts

248 months

Tuesday 1st May 2007
quotequote all
mg6b said:
Cooperman said:
Now for a constructive answer.
If there are no rear seats you cannot carry passengers in the place where those seats should be. There is some regulation to that effect, although I'm afraid I can't actually quote it.
In my rally Rover 214Si I have had to fold the rear seats flat and the seat belt mountings have had to be removed to allow the roll cage to be fitted. There is always some contention as to whether the car complies with the C & U Regulations although since the seats can't be re-fitted it's never been a problem with MoT or The Old Bill.



Regulation 100 Con and Use regs 1978.

Dangerous condition or unsuitable use covers all!!!



OK, so illegal is the answer...
Thanks for the info thumbup

Edited by AL666 on Tuesday 1st May 20:18

jaybkay

488 posts

250 months

Wednesday 2nd May 2007
quotequote all
But note that if you remove a seat and belt the vehicle cannot fail an MOT on those items as they aren't there. (Best not to take the drivers seat out though).

Hence if a passenger seat has a dodgy seat belt or mounting, take it out for the test. Only items that have to be fitted by law must be present and correct, everything else is only part of the test if it's there.

AL666

Original Poster:

2,679 posts

248 months

Wednesday 2nd May 2007
quotequote all
jaybkay said:
But note that if you remove a seat and belt the vehicle cannot fail an MOT on those items as they aren't there. (Best not to take the drivers seat out though).

Hence if a passenger seat has a dodgy seat belt or mounting, take it out for the test. Only items that have to be fitted by law must be present and correct, everything else is only part of the test if it's there.


Even though it's registered as a 4-seater car?

madazrx7

5,997 posts

247 months

Wednesday 2nd May 2007
quotequote all
jaybkay said:
..Hence if a passenger seat has a dodgy seat belt or mounting, take it out for the test. ..

Not the best advice I've ever read; if you have a dodgy seat belt or mounting... get it fixed!!