Police Officers are merely tools of the current Government.
Police Officers are merely tools of the current Government.
Author
Discussion

WhoseGeneration

Original Poster:

4,090 posts

237 months

Sunday 6th May 2007
quotequote all
Government, of whatever Political Party, and it's particular agenda.
Some here might remember the Miner's strike and how the Government of the time used the Police Service to acheive it's aims.
So, if individuals want to keep their job, they have to abide by the ethos of the current regime.
Same as any occupation.
It may not make it morally or philosophically right.
That's our World.

Bing o

15,184 posts

249 months

Sunday 6th May 2007
quotequote all
WhoseGeneration said:

Government, of whatever Political Party, and it's particular agenda.
Some here might remember the Miner's strike and how the Government of the time used the Police Service to acheive it's aims.
So, if individuals want to keep their job, they have to abide by the ethos of the current regime.
Same as any occupation.
It may not make it morally or philosophically right.
That's our World.


Pass the crack pipe vicar.

You miss one important point - that the government is elected by the tax payer.

We tend to get the government we deserve...

dcb

6,070 posts

295 months

Sunday 6th May 2007
quotequote all
Bing o said:

You miss one important point - that the government is elected by the tax payer.

We tend to get the government we deserve...


Not quite - the UK Gov is
elected by voters, not tax payers.

Almost all folks are tax payers in some
way or another, even gypsies.

A significant group of folks don't bother to
vote.

Like Ken Livingstone said "If voting changed
anything, then they would abolish it."

Australia has a much fairer system - voting
is mandatory.

7db

6,060 posts

260 months

Sunday 6th May 2007
quotequote all
Businesses pay a lot of tax, but don't get a vote...

EDLT

15,421 posts

236 months

Sunday 6th May 2007
quotequote all

If that happened then you could, in theory, set up lots of businesses and have lots of votes like Virgin. How many votes would that get?

80bob

101 posts

280 months

Sunday 6th May 2007
quotequote all
dcb said:
Bing o said:

You miss one important point - that the government is elected by the tax payer.

We tend to get the government we deserve...



Australia has a much fairer system - voting
is mandatory.



Mandatory voting is not actually beneficial. The Australian model does not give you any better government and as everyone has to vote (or be fined) then people just turn up and stick an X any where they fancy without thinking too hard about it. Besides, in a democracy it should be our right not to vote.

I disagree with forcing people to vote (that's what they did in Soviet Russia for example) however if (and it's a very big IF) there was a 'none of the above' box it would make it slightly more acceptable.

Compulsory voting is another example of the state forcing its citizens to bend to its will and sorry, I don't actually think it brings any benefits. Having been in Oz for nearly sven years I certainly don't see any improvements here. If I was to be a bit cynical I would even suggest that it has meant the most appalling 'speed kills' policies getting voted in.

spaximus

4,365 posts

283 months

Monday 7th May 2007
quotequote all
The reason many do not vote is not because they cannot be bothered, but it is because they do not understand. Unlike the States, where they have a big political education, with school elections etc, we have none. The fear in this country is that potential voters would be idoctrianated by left wing teachers, so we do nonthing.
I am shocked by how many of my staff don't understand the differances between the parties and where our tax money goes.
Working class people and women fought to get the vote we should all use it.

GreenV8S

31,027 posts

314 months

Monday 7th May 2007
quotequote all
spaximus said:
I am shocked by how many of my staff don't understand the differances between the parties and where our tax money goes.


I don't understand it either tbh, they're all power-hungry control freaks who will take as much money as they think they can get away with and squander it.

vonhosen

40,597 posts

247 months

Monday 7th May 2007
quotequote all
I think there's less ground between the two major parties than there has ever been.

maddog993

1,220 posts

270 months

Monday 7th May 2007
quotequote all
spaximus said:
The reason many do not vote is not because they cannot be bothered, but it is because they do not understand. Unlike the States, where they have a big political education, with school elections etc, we have none.


and this 'education' has led to the voting in of imbeciles of the likes of Reagan and 'Dubbya' Bush. Historically the UK has been more politically switched-on and politically educated than the States with the ability to understand complex issues in a way that the average US voter could not (or was not given the opportunity to). It is only relatively recently that UK politics has followed the depressing US trait of dumbing-down issues and the incredibly irritating media/rolling news friendly 'sound-bites' designed for short attention spans and low IQs.

spaximus said:
The fear in this country is that potential voters would be idoctrianated by left wing teachers, so we do nonthing.
..........Working class people and women fought to get the vote we should all use it.

Don't agree about the left-wing teacher paranoia but agree totally with the last point.



Edited by maddog993 on Monday 7th May 12:42

dcb

6,070 posts

295 months

Monday 7th May 2007
quotequote all
vonhosen said:

I think there's less ground between the two major parties than there has ever been.


Blimey - a chance to agree with From-Trousers.

The battle ground in UK politics is the middle ground.

I see UK politics going the same way as US politics
has already gone - two centrist parties with not even a
fag paper between them and very few people bother
to vote since it doesn't change anything.

This leaves the 1970s style hard left socialists and the
"Daily Mail" hard right Tories out on a limb.

Unless Peter Hitchins gets his finger out
and brings back Thatcherite policies.



TheKeyboardDemon

713 posts

237 months

Monday 7th May 2007
quotequote all
I think we are increasingly heading towards a form of American government where we have a right wing and an extreme right wing both competing for votes only here we have a few odd ball, middle of the road (somewhere between right wing and extreme right wing) parties who fight for a single seat while the major 2 parties fight for power.

I'd like to see a "None of the above" option when it comes to voting. I thought it was funny when Bliar complained about a lack of voting turn out after an election being down to apathy, then shortly afterwards he decided that he only need attend 1 Prime Ministers question time session a week instead of 2.

spaximus

4,365 posts

283 months

Monday 7th May 2007
quotequote all
maddog993 said:
spaximus said:
The reason many do not vote is not because they cannot be bothered, but it is because they do not understand. Unlike the States, where they have a big political education, with school elections etc, we have none.


and this 'education' has led to the voting in of imbeciles of the likes of Reagan and 'Dubbya' Bush. Historically the UK has been more politically switched-on and politically educated than the States with the ability to understand complex issues in a way that the average US voter could not (or was not given the opportunity to). It is only relatively recently that UK politics has followed the depressing US trait of dumbing-down issues and the incredibly irritating media/rolling news friendly 'sound-bites' designed for short attention spans and low IQs.

I agree we used to be much more aware, but when I was at school in the 70s we did have education which encompassed the way politics worked. Now they do not have any from what my daughters education appeared to be. Yes the Americans don't always get it right but at least there is a debate which is full if not always giving the best result. Totally agree with the sound bite dumbing down, good looks are now more important than honesty and ability for a career in politics.

spaximus said:
The fear in this country is that potential voters would be idoctrianated by left wing teachers, so we do nonthing.
..........Working class people and women fought to get the vote we should all use it.

Don't agree about the left-wing teacher paranoia but agree totally with the last point.

That was one of the reasons that it was stopped in the area I came from, basically in south Yorkshire it was Labour, the Goverment felt it was not right to have teachers who were seen to be left wing educating the kids.



Edited by maddog993 on Monday 7th May 12:42

maddog993

1,220 posts

270 months

Monday 7th May 2007
quotequote all
spaximus said:

The fear in this country is that potential voters would be idoctrianated by left wing teachers, so we do nonthing.
That was one of the reasons that it was stopped in the area I came from, basically in south Yorkshire it was Labour, the Goverment felt it was not right to have teachers who were seen to be left wing educating the kids.

(sorry, I misinterpreted your point as a personal fear of 'reds-under-the-bed-left-wing' teachers) -again I agree with you.



Edited by maddog993 on Monday 7th May 13:04

Strawman

6,463 posts

237 months

Monday 7th May 2007
quotequote all
In the local elections (council) here in Cork one of the candidates saw he was odds of 35-1 to win, so when canvassing he went around telling voters to vote for him and put a few quid on at the same time.






He was duly elected

chrispy porker

17,733 posts

258 months

Monday 7th May 2007
quotequote all
I think, on election days, the rolling current total of votes so far for each candidate should be freely publicly displayed.
You could then see who was doing well and vote accordingly.
It might encourage more people to vote.

If people realised that the party they don't like is getting ahead.


Also why not combine it with a lottery? A lucky voter will win a prize........

Porkbrain

406 posts

267 months

Monday 7th May 2007
quotequote all
[/quote]
Blimey - a chance to agree with From-Trousers.
[/quote]

And just to inject a bit of levity, having just done a German course as a squaddie I had a leak in a radiator hose in my old Fiat in Berlin and said to a mechanic that I had a leak in my Hosen.

Only when he rolled on the deck laughing did I remember that Slauch is a hose, Hosen are trousers

jith

2,752 posts

245 months

Monday 7th May 2007
quotequote all
vonhosen said:
I think there's less ground between the two major parties than there has ever been.


Well, well von, we finally agree absolutely on something!!
Just look at what is happening in Scotland right now with the SNP and Labour.
Only one seat in it and most MSPs running around like headless chickens trying to form a government!!
How can the philosophy of democracy possibly be at work now, eh?

catso

16,529 posts

297 months

Monday 7th May 2007
quotequote all
Bing o said:

You miss one important point - that the government is elected by the tax payer.

We tend to get the government we deserve...



Generally I'd agree with this statement but I don't think anyone deserves this shambles.........

streaky

19,311 posts

279 months

Monday 7th May 2007
quotequote all
jith said:
vonhosen said:
I think there's less ground between the two major parties than there has ever been.


Well, well von, we finally agree absolutely on something!!
Just look at what is happening in Scotland right now with the SNP and Labour.
Only one seat in it and most MSPs running around like headless chickens trying to form a government!!
How can the philosophy of democracy possibly be at work now, eh?
PR often results in the third largest party holding sway and the enablement of their policies. Which is not what the voters wanted, or they'd be the largest party - Streaky