Company Speed Advice.....
Company Speed Advice.....
Author
Discussion

Munter

Original Poster:

31,331 posts

272 months

Tuesday 26th June 2007
quotequote all
Have a read of this and let me know what you think.... And no fence sitting.! smile

MONTHLY CAMPAIGN
Safety in Carparks (and on the road)
Our IS carparks are not overburdened with signage or lines telling us to slow down and give way, although you may have noticed the small 5 mph signs displayed on lamp posts. Have you noticed your own speed when driving in and out? Have you had to dodge someone else leaving work in a hurry?

Here's a reminder about staying safe while moving around our carparks ...


- NEVER exceed the 5mph speed limit, it's there for a reason
- Vehicles should always be parked in a dedicated parking area
- Always use any available footpaths while going to and from your car
- NEVER leave your vehicle with the engine on.


... and some interesting numbers from the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents website ...


Are you 'Dying' to get there? Research confirms:

- Each 1 mph reduction in average speed is expected to cut accident frequency by 5%
- Speeders are disproportionately involved in collisions
- Some people do not accept that speed is a problem. Even those that say they don't always act accordingly
- Drivers often do not understand why speed limits are set as they are. In some cases it may not be clear to them what the limit is
- Smooth driving without fast acceleration and deceleration is less polluting than harsh driving
- In the UK, there are still 1.6 million injuries in workplaces every year
- Nearly a quarter of all deaths involving vehicles at work occur while vehicles are reversing.

With thanks to XXXXXXX for managing this campaign ... Watch this space for a new campaign towards the end of July ... all suggestions for future topics are welcome, as are volunteer organisers!

Parrot of Doom

23,075 posts

265 months

Tuesday 26th June 2007
quotequote all
Inform them that the 5mph limit sign does not appear in the road traffic regulations act (or whatever it is), and is therefore not enforceable.

Fidgits

17,202 posts

260 months

Tuesday 26th June 2007
quotequote all
Also, i'd query the 1.6 million accidents, a majority of which are car related - but cars REVERSING... probably within the 5mph speed limit, so how that jump occured seems a touch dodgy!

Peter Ward

2,097 posts

287 months

Tuesday 26th June 2007
quotequote all
The "dying" stuff is a strange mix of truth, fiction and rubbish, but the car park stuff is more relevant. I remember being told on my first defensive driving course a few years ago that 10% of all accidents happen in car parks. They're not usually going to be life-threatening, but can be annoying and potentially painful if it's your neck that gets jolted in a low-speed clash.

As always, take what's good and ignore the rest. Companies have to be seen to be giving out H&S messages and this is the sort of result that sometimes happens. Wait till you get told about CO2, carbon footprints and switching everyone to low-energy lightbulbs to save the planet...

Deva Link

26,934 posts

276 months

Tuesday 26th June 2007
quotequote all
Parrot of Doom said:
Inform them that the 5mph limit sign does not appear in the road traffic regulations act (or whatever it is), and is therefore not enforceable.
That would be a dodgy road to travel for H&S reasons and breaching the limit might lead to disciplinary action.

Munter

Original Poster:

31,331 posts

272 months

Tuesday 26th June 2007
quotequote all
Peter Ward said:
Wait till you get told about CO2, carbon footprints and switching everyone to low-energy lightbulbs to save the planet...
Oh they already did that! "We switched to a energy provider that uses nukes to produce power cutting our carbon footprint." Err no actually you changed nothing. If we claim the energy from the nuke power stations the oil/gas/coal ones will provide to others. Muppets.

Big Fat F'r

1,232 posts

237 months

Tuesday 26th June 2007
quotequote all
Munter said:
....some interesting numbers from the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents website ...

Are you 'Dying' to get there? Research confirms:

- Each 1 mph reduction in average speed is expected to cut accident frequency by 5%
- Speeders are disproportionately involved in collisions
- Some people do not accept that speed is a problem. Even those that say they don't always act accordingly
- Drivers often do not understand why speed limits are set as they are. In some cases it may not be clear to them what the limit is
- Smooth driving without fast acceleration and deceleration is less polluting than harsh driving
- In the UK, there are still 1.6 million injuries in workplaces every year
- Nearly a quarter of all deaths involving vehicles at work occur while vehicles are reversing.

With thanks to XXXXXXX for managing this campaign ... Watch this space for a new campaign towards the end of July ... all suggestions for future topics are welcome, as are volunteer organisers!
Munter - are you saying here's some data thats worth considering as it seems to disagree with other published data. Or are you saying it's wrong just because it is. Or are you saying its wrong because (insert your reasons). Or are you saying it's right.

I can't see where you're coming from with what you've written.

BFF

TrevorH

1,359 posts

315 months

Tuesday 26th June 2007
quotequote all
"Are you 'Dying' to get there? Research confirms:

- Each 1 mph reduction in average speed is expected to cut accident frequency by 5%"

This, of course, is complete b***x. This was a very poor piece of statistics linking completely unrelated studies. The SafeSpeed site carries a full explanation.

Sorry, no sitting on the fence on this one.

Edited by TrevorH on Tuesday 26th June 12:55

voyds9

8,490 posts

314 months

Tuesday 26th June 2007
quotequote all
Munter said:
- Each 1 mph reduction in average speed is expected to cut accident frequency by 5%
Point out to them that if they drop the speed limit to 0mph 75% of the accidents will still occur.

Mattt

16,664 posts

249 months

Tuesday 26th June 2007
quotequote all
Munter said:
- Nearly a quarter of all deaths involving vehicles at work occur while vehicles are reversing.
I never get stats like this. Even if you make people more careful when reversing, 75% of people are still killed when travelling forwards.

alock

4,568 posts

242 months

Tuesday 26th June 2007
quotequote all
Munter said:
Each 1 mph reduction in average speed is expected to cut accident frequency by 5%
You can't compare crash freqency when deciding on speed limits because the slower limit will ALWAYS have a slower journey time and hence a lower crash frequency.

You should compare crashes per driven mile or something similar.

Yee haa!

590 posts

247 months

Tuesday 26th June 2007
quotequote all
Munter said:
- Each 1 mph reduction in average speed is expected to cut accident frequency by 5%
lol that means by doing 50mph on the motorway i will never crash! yay

Vipers

33,516 posts

259 months

Tuesday 26th June 2007
quotequote all
I personally would add "If you have the skill, always reverse into a parking space", I always do for the following reason. As you approach the parking space, you are totally aware of whats going on around you.

If you drive into the space, when you return to your car, get in, sort yourself out, etc etc, you may not be fully aware of whats going behind you as you reverse out, like pedestrians, who ignore those little white reversing lights on your car, and continue to walk past you, possibly children walking past, and of course other cars moving around.

smile

Big Rod

6,265 posts

247 months

Tuesday 26th June 2007
quotequote all
Vipers said:
I personally would add "If you have the skill, always reverse into a parking space", I always do for the following reason. As you approach the parking space, you are totally aware of whats going on around you.

If you drive into the space, when you return to your car, get in, sort yourself out, etc etc, you may not be fully aware of whats going behind you as you reverse out, like pedestrians, who ignore those little white reversing lights on your car, and continue to walk past you, possibly children walking past, and of course other cars moving around.

smile
That depends on whether you need access to the boot and how busy the car park is really. Otherwise, reversing a car into a space is actually easier considering the dynamics involved.

Munter

Original Poster:

31,331 posts

272 months

Tuesday 26th June 2007
quotequote all
Big Fat F'r said:
Munter said:
....some interesting numbers from the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents website ...

Are you 'Dying' to get there? Research confirms:

- Each 1 mph reduction in average speed is expected to cut accident frequency by 5%
- Speeders are disproportionately involved in collisions
- Some people do not accept that speed is a problem. Even those that say they don't always act accordingly
- Drivers often do not understand why speed limits are set as they are. In some cases it may not be clear to them what the limit is
- Smooth driving without fast acceleration and deceleration is less polluting than harsh driving
- In the UK, there are still 1.6 million injuries in workplaces every year
- Nearly a quarter of all deaths involving vehicles at work occur while vehicles are reversing.

With thanks to XXXXXXX for managing this campaign ... Watch this space for a new campaign towards the end of July ... all suggestions for future topics are welcome, as are volunteer organisers!
Munter - are you saying here's some data thats worth considering as it seems to disagree with other published data. Or are you saying it's wrong just because it is. Or are you saying its wrong because (insert your reasons). Or are you saying it's right.

I can't see where you're coming from with what you've written.

BFF
I wanted your opinion on what the company said. All I wrote was the 1st line of my original post. Your quote is a part of the information presented by the company.

hahithestevieboy

845 posts

245 months

Tuesday 26th June 2007
quotequote all
Fidgits said:
Also, i'd query the 1.6 million accidents, a majority of which are car related - but cars REVERSING... probably within the 5mph speed limit, so how that jump occured seems a touch dodgy!
Probably reversing vehicles on building sites. Nothing to do with the roads (or car parks) what so ever.

The whole "campaign" sounded to me like meaningless bable with most of the "interesting statistics" taken and used hugely out of their original context.

hahithestevieboy

845 posts

245 months

Tuesday 26th June 2007
quotequote all
Vipers said:
I personally would add "If you have the skill, always reverse into a parking space", I always do for the following reason. As you approach the parking space, you are totally aware of whats going on around you.

If you drive into the space, when you return to your car, get in, sort yourself out, etc etc, you may not be fully aware of whats going behind you as you reverse out, like pedestrians, who ignore those little white reversing lights on your car, and continue to walk past you, possibly children walking past, and of course other cars moving around.

smile
Naa, i drive in but employ a man with a red flag to watch me in and out....

esselte

14,626 posts

298 months

Tuesday 26th June 2007
quotequote all
Parrot of Doom said:
Inform them that the 5mph limit sign does not appear in the road traffic regulations act (or whatever it is), and is therefore not enforceable.
Also have you got a speedo that will read 5mph accurately?

Vipers

33,516 posts

259 months

Tuesday 26th June 2007
quotequote all
Big Rod said:
Vipers said:
I personally would add "If you have the skill, always reverse into a parking space", I always do for the following reason. As you approach the parking space, you are totally aware of whats going on around you.

If you drive into the space, when you return to your car, get in, sort yourself out, etc etc, you may not be fully aware of whats going behind you as you reverse out, like pedestrians, who ignore those little white reversing lights on your car, and continue to walk past you, possibly children walking past, and of course other cars moving around.

smile
That depends on whether you need access to the boot and how busy the car park is really. Otherwise, reversing a car into a space is actually easier considering the dynamics involved.
Yes it is easier, agree. but so many drive in, and then have an awful time trying to reverse out, like folk who drive into their driveways, then have a gods awful job of reversing out into the traffic the next day. Me, I used to swan up, pull over, on indicators, and slowly reverse into the drive, someone will eventually figure out what you are doing and let you in. Mind many will still drive around you in case they loose 3 seconds between them and the car in front?

smile

Big Fat F'r

1,232 posts

237 months

Wednesday 27th June 2007
quotequote all
Munter said:
Big Fat F'r said:
Munter said:
....some interesting numbers from the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents website ...

Are you 'Dying' to get there? Research confirms:

- Each 1 mph reduction in average speed is expected to cut accident frequency by 5%
- Speeders are disproportionately involved in collisions
- Some people do not accept that speed is a problem. Even those that say they don't always act accordingly
- Drivers often do not understand why speed limits are set as they are. In some cases it may not be clear to them what the limit is
- Smooth driving without fast acceleration and deceleration is less polluting than harsh driving
- In the UK, there are still 1.6 million injuries in workplaces every year
- Nearly a quarter of all deaths involving vehicles at work occur while vehicles are reversing.

With thanks to XXXXXXX for managing this campaign ... Watch this space for a new campaign towards the end of July ... all suggestions for future topics are welcome, as are volunteer organisers!
Munter - are you saying here's some data thats worth considering as it seems to disagree with other published data. Or are you saying it's wrong just because it is. Or are you saying its wrong because (insert your reasons). Or are you saying it's right.

I can't see where you're coming from with what you've written.

BFF
I wanted your opinion on what the company said. All I wrote was the 1st line of my original post. Your quote is a part of the information presented by the company.
Munter - I just couldn't grasp your take on it. I assume it's where you work, so what do you think of the information from the company, and Rospa. Matters not a jot whether you are right or wrong, I just wondered what you thought (particularly of the Rospa info, which is often overlooked by some who purport to be interested in research....say no more!!!).

BFF