Parking tickets - bit of advice.
Discussion
nah, it's a result of copying and pasting on an older and crapper computer.
Letter has worked twice now!
The point made in the case law basically says that if the lines deviate from the guildlines in the diagram then they are unenforcable. So if you get done, check all the measurements thoroughly in terms of the distance from the kerb they are painted etc etc.
Letter has worked twice now!
The point made in the case law basically says that if the lines deviate from the guildlines in the diagram then they are unenforcable. So if you get done, check all the measurements thoroughly in terms of the distance from the kerb they are painted etc etc.
It may not always work.
Be aware what a Parking Adjudicator held on the 'de mininimus' rule.
http://tinyurl.com/bc5ql
dvd
Be aware what a Parking Adjudicator held on the 'de mininimus' rule.
http://tinyurl.com/bc5ql
dvd
That's an interesting read DwightVanDriver. However, in my letter there is quoted specific case law on the matter. I was also aware of the business of the t-bars/parking bays but the line in question in my example above was so outside the limits. A. It can barely be seen and b. Is considerably further away from the kerb line than the prescribed distance in the diagram.
The case you highlighted refers to the law not being concerned with trifles however the case law I quote in my example clearly states "even to a reasonable man....etc."
Given the applicant was appealing solely on the ground of the t-bars it is obvious why he lost.
The case you highlighted refers to the law not being concerned with trifles however the case law I quote in my example clearly states "even to a reasonable man....etc."
Given the applicant was appealing solely on the ground of the t-bars it is obvious why he lost.
Forums | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff






