It never flash or burn.. 4 lane Gatso
Discussion
I find it.. in Autocar.. und in Sexpress on page 12 by Jo Macfarlane. I search sexy site for gory detail. They not posted it up yet 
I sure someomne find a linky to this story 
as it appear in today's "Autocar" und "Express - page 10 reported by Jo Macfarlane"
But anyway .. this the Big Brother of scams as it monitor 4 lanes.
It described as "vandal proof" (Nothing ist that.. they have delusions there )
The cams are 13 foot above road. They digital. They not flash. Image go to nearest police station (It mean police lose pals yet again .. und we all want to 
our lovely police. 
but 
we not not support "silliness"
Captain Gatso quoted as saying "a challenge for angle grinder man - but he "work on this"!
Ja.. they invent.. so do the criminal hooligan or vigilante work on his fight back It not that I support the good captain ... but I do understand his anger all the same. I think it undermine Paul und the logical counter -argument. But I can still understand the white heat of the anger here. I think police und authorities should at least try to understand this anger as only then can they hope to soothe it down . They need to -if they are to keep the mutual respect/awe/compliance/intelligence/work together with respectful compliance und neogtiation
The Device ist called IDEE (innovative Digital Enforcement Environemt) It cost £30-50 K with the electronics able to
ABD already slated this contraption
Interestingly .. Home Office say gadget has to be approved und cannot be used as evidence unless they approve.
What worry me most ist this quote from DfT in Sexpress from DfT
I sure someomne find a linky to this story as it appear in today's "Autocar" und "Express - page 10 reported by Jo Macfarlane"But anyway .. this the Big Brother of scams as it monitor 4 lanes.
It described as "vandal proof" (Nothing ist that.. they have delusions there ) The cams are 13 foot above road. They digital. They not flash. Image go to nearest police station
(It mean police lose pals yet again .. und we all want to our lovely police. but we not not support "silliness" Captain Gatso quoted as saying "a challenge for angle grinder man - but he "work on this"!
Ja.. they invent.. so do the criminal hooligan or vigilante work on his fight back
It not that I support the good captain ... but I do understand his anger all the same. I think it undermine Paul und the logical counter -argument. But I can still understand the white heat of the anger here. I think police und authorities should at least try to understand this anger as only then can they hope to soothe it down . They need to -if they are to keep the mutual respect/awe/compliance/intelligence/work together with respectful compliance und neogtiation The Device ist called IDEE (innovative Digital Enforcement Environemt) It cost £30-50 K with the electronics able to
sexpress article said:
be insulated against extreme heat. Able to survive fires.. able to monitor 4 lane of traffic
That so? Well given 2006 summer .. should we then have challenged all NIPS on that basis? ABD already slated this contraption
Interestingly .. Home Office say gadget has to be approved und cannot be used as evidence unless they approve.
What worry me most ist this quote from DfT in Sexpress from DfT
article on page 12 said:
We don't comment on which companies have applied for type approval due to commercial confidence"!
Hooli said:
tribbles said:
Probably not paintball/shotgun proof though...
RPG/thermite/angle grinder......ladder & vaseline - wont look damaged then till they check the images
I want cops. I want the idiots not given a fine. I want them to at least understand why unsafe speed. I want some learning curve.
I think this mostest essential.
I had the sneakiest of sneaky ideas earlier, reading about this in Auto Express. How about, a square of that one-way mirror glass - put the shiny side pointing into the lens, so from outside it'll look entirely normal... I assume there's come sort of clear adhesive that wouldn't smear, somewhere...
Disclaimer - I would only attempt this on your own cameras, because all automatic speed monitoring technology exists purely for the greater good. Don't speed, don't commit acts of vandalism, etc, etc.
Disclaimer - I would only attempt this on your own cameras, because all automatic speed monitoring technology exists purely for the greater good. Don't speed, don't commit acts of vandalism, etc, etc.
Being accidently run in to by an HGV might damage it?
As others have said, why not educate drivers? You could educate a lot of people for £30-50k!
There is always a weak point with these devices - how do they transmit the data back to base? If it is hardwired a bit of spade work and a snip - problem solved! If transmitted wirelessly - little jamming device. obviously these are purely thoughts and i won't condone any such action. Also being a careful driver I am observant and drive with a speed appropriate to the conditions!!
As others have said, why not educate drivers? You could educate a lot of people for £30-50k!
There is always a weak point with these devices - how do they transmit the data back to base? If it is hardwired a bit of spade work and a snip - problem solved! If transmitted wirelessly - little jamming device. obviously these are purely thoughts and i won't condone any such action. Also being a careful driver I am observant and drive with a speed appropriate to the conditions!!
Forums | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff