Using a recovery truck for general Haulage.
Using a recovery truck for general Haulage.
Author
Discussion

Yung Man

Original Poster:

737 posts

236 months

Thursday 6th September 2007
quotequote all
Yesterday I saw a Bonneted Scania pulling a low loader trailer, it had a custom red paint job with the words POPEYE and RECOVERY painted on it, it looked cool.
On the back where 2 medium sized mobile homes, neither of which had number plates on they looked brand new, my questions are, Is a recovery truck classed as general haulage transport, or as a crane on wheels, did i see a recovery firm doing someone elses job, would they be insured for general haulage because the 2 mobile homes didn't seem to bo broken down.
If a recovery truck is not classed as general haulage maybe they pay reduced road tax.

It just seemed odd.

SplatSpeed

7,491 posts

282 months

Thursday 6th September 2007
quotequote all
Yung Man said:
Yesterday I saw a Bonneted Scania pulling a low loader trailer, it had a custom red paint job with the words POPEYE and RECOVERY painted on it, it looked cool.
On the back where 2 medium sized mobile homes, neither of which had number plates on they looked brand new, my questions are, Is a recovery truck classed as general haulage transport, or as a crane on wheels, did i see a recovery firm doing someone elses job, would they be insured for general haulage because the 2 mobile homes didn't seem to bo broken down.
If a recovery truck is not classed as general haulage maybe they pay reduced road tax.

It just seemed odd.
no mot

Yung Man

Original Poster:

737 posts

236 months

Thursday 6th September 2007
quotequote all
SplatSpeed said:
Yung Man said:
Yesterday I saw a Bonneted Scania

It just seemed odd.
no mot
Thats what I thought, If it doesn't need an MOT because it's classed as a piece of machinery then it shouldn't be moving brand new mobile homes, they haven't broken down have they?.

pja

272 posts

256 months

Thursday 6th September 2007
quotequote all
It all depends what its taxed as ...recovery or HGV?

pja

272 posts

256 months

Thursday 6th September 2007
quotequote all
& it should have an MOT whatever it's taxed as

Methane Bloke

264 posts

233 months

Thursday 6th September 2007
quotequote all
My old CF recovery was taxed as PLG (<3500Kgs) and required a class 7 MOT.

Regards

Chris

Yung Man

Original Poster:

737 posts

236 months

Thursday 6th September 2007
quotequote all
pja said:
& it should have an MOT whatever it's taxed as
Unless it's under 3 years old.

lgw

305 posts

241 months

Thursday 6th September 2007
quotequote all
Any vehicle licensed for Recovery pays lower vehicle excise duty, is exempt from Operator Licensing and EU Driving Regulation

Yung Man

Original Poster:

737 posts

236 months

Thursday 6th September 2007
quotequote all
lgw said:
Any vehicle licensed for Recovery pays lower vehicle excise duty, is exempt from Operator Licensing and EU Driving Regulation
So is moving brand new motor homes recovery or general haulage.

gazza285

11,240 posts

239 months

Thursday 6th September 2007
quotequote all
He might have recovered the low loader from an accident or a break down? Or it might be his and his extended family's new home(s).

pja

272 posts

256 months

Thursday 6th September 2007
quotequote all
Yung Man said:
lgw said:
Any vehicle licensed for Recovery pays lower vehicle excise duty, is exempt from Operator Licensing and EU Driving Regulation
So is moving brand new motor homes recovery or general haulage.
.........general haulage yes

A lot of big recovery firms are taxing their recovery vehicles as goods & putting O licence's on them
It allows them to transport new vehicles,plant or anything they want
so unless you saw the taxation class on the disc we'll never know if they were doing someone else's job

BTW... A commercial vehicle of over 3.5t needs an MOT @ 12 months old

WhoseGeneration

4,090 posts

238 months

Thursday 6th September 2007
quotequote all
You think this is a can of worms.
Showman's vehicles is even more so.
See them on the roads, get past or hold back, whichever is appropriate.

PeteG

4,278 posts

242 months

Friday 7th September 2007
quotequote all
WhoseGeneration said:
You think this is a can of worms.
Showman's vehicles is even more so.
See them on the roads, get past or hold back, whichever is appropriate.
Drove past a circus set up in C. Durham the other day. Loved the sight of all the old wagons, still working for a living... then thought I'd rather not be in the vicinity when they're on the road... wink

liner33

10,861 posts

233 months

Friday 7th September 2007
quotequote all
Yung Man said:
pja said:
& it should have an MOT whatever it's taxed as
Unless it's under 3 years old.
Dont think trucks have the 3 year rule , annual testing required from new