Court summons - Driving without insurance
Discussion
MK4 Slowride said:
Sorry, how can you have a good reason for driving without insurance?
iirc, that'll be 6 points on his licence, whether he's got one or not.
He drove his mum to the hospital A&E in her car?iirc, that'll be 6 points on his licence, whether he's got one or not.
I don't know, I just made that up, but there *might* be a good reason for driving without insurance.
s2art said:
I thought the situation had to be life threatening. Possibly OK if the safety of the Realm is involved.
It'd be interesting to know what the rule is on that. Yes, life threatening but 'what if' uninsured/unlicenced driver caused another Rav,
If your friend suffers from epilepsy he will undoubtedly have a restricted licence,yeah,this means that he has been assessed medically to be fit to drive based on the fact that if he does have a fit whilst driving he would hopefully know when it is going to occurr therefore be able to pull over to the side of the road when it does happen.
Then he will be able to recover with what ever medication he has to take to overcome the attack and should be able to continue to drive once he feels fit.
Now,if I were the officer who was dealing with the offence of no Insurance and this is the excuse that I was presented with then I would be asking the above questions , if this is the case then I would be sending your friend for a further medical, and in between time asking the DVLA to revoke his licence until such times as it can be investigated by the relevant authorities, and if your friend has never suffered from epilepsy before then it would apply only from the begining.
So, if your mate is truly epileptic then I would possibly look to assist but if I found out that it was a little porky just to get off with a No Insurance then I would / could be considering either Obstruction or PTCOJ depends as to what stage the prosecution was at.
Stefluc
If your friend suffers from epilepsy he will undoubtedly have a restricted licence,yeah,this means that he has been assessed medically to be fit to drive based on the fact that if he does have a fit whilst driving he would hopefully know when it is going to occurr therefore be able to pull over to the side of the road when it does happen.
Then he will be able to recover with what ever medication he has to take to overcome the attack and should be able to continue to drive once he feels fit.
Now,if I were the officer who was dealing with the offence of no Insurance and this is the excuse that I was presented with then I would be asking the above questions , if this is the case then I would be sending your friend for a further medical, and in between time asking the DVLA to revoke his licence until such times as it can be investigated by the relevant authorities, and if your friend has never suffered from epilepsy before then it would apply only from the begining.
So, if your mate is truly epileptic then I would possibly look to assist but if I found out that it was a little porky just to get off with a No Insurance then I would / could be considering either Obstruction or PTCOJ depends as to what stage the prosecution was at.
Stefluc
I think he's looking at 6 points.
He didn't *need* to drive the car. Even if rushing epileptic friend to hospital the question would be whether he genuinely believed that an ambulance couldn't have got there "in time", and whether the hospital was the nearest place that the ambulance could have got to. If just dropping it back, then natural question is why couldn't someone else drop the car back? If in danger, he could drive it to the nearest place of safety (ie the hard shoulder if on the motorway). Sounds like he went further than that.
Unlucky to get caught. Why was he?
Epileptic friend is looking at 12 months without driving if that's his first fit. Good luck to him - similar thing happened to a fried of mine recently.
He didn't *need* to drive the car. Even if rushing epileptic friend to hospital the question would be whether he genuinely believed that an ambulance couldn't have got there "in time", and whether the hospital was the nearest place that the ambulance could have got to. If just dropping it back, then natural question is why couldn't someone else drop the car back? If in danger, he could drive it to the nearest place of safety (ie the hard shoulder if on the motorway). Sounds like he went further than that.
Unlucky to get caught. Why was he?
Epileptic friend is looking at 12 months without driving if that's his first fit. Good luck to him - similar thing happened to a fried of mine recently.
Rav said:
The driver had a epaleptic fit. My freind drove his car back home, but en-route were stopped by the old bill.
If he had driven the guy straight to hospital, and was convinced it was a medical emergency (that is it was reasonable for a lay person to think so) then he would get away with it. Driving him home? I reckon not.The only exception clause under Road Traffic Act 1988 S 143 is:
(3) A person charged with using a motor vehicle in contravention of this section shall not be convicted if he proves—
(a) that the vehicle did not belong to him and was not in his possession under a contract of hiring or of loan,
(b) that he was using the vehicle in the course of his employment, and
(c) that he neither knew nor had reason to believe that there was not in force in relation to the vehicle such a policy of insurance or security as is mentioned in subsection (1) above.
Medical emergencies are not covered. However this may be brought up in mitigation with a view to trying to get a reduction of fine/points and up to the Mags.
dvd
(3) A person charged with using a motor vehicle in contravention of this section shall not be convicted if he proves—
(a) that the vehicle did not belong to him and was not in his possession under a contract of hiring or of loan,
(b) that he was using the vehicle in the course of his employment, and
(c) that he neither knew nor had reason to believe that there was not in force in relation to the vehicle such a policy of insurance or security as is mentioned in subsection (1) above.
Medical emergencies are not covered. However this may be brought up in mitigation with a view to trying to get a reduction of fine/points and up to the Mags.
dvd
Vesuvius 996 said:
Rav said:
The driver had a epaleptic fit. My freind drove his car back home, but en-route were stopped by the old bill.
LMFAO.And that's supposed to be a good reason.
B0llocks mate.
6 points and a big fine.
TTwiggy said:
Vesuvius 996 said:
Rav said:
The driver had a epaleptic fit. My freind drove his car back home, but en-route were stopped by the old bill.
LMFAO.And that's supposed to be a good reason.
B0llocks mate.
6 points and a big fine.
So if you get the book thrown at you, you can only expect it!
JustinP1 said:
TTwiggy said:
Vesuvius 996 said:
Rav said:
The driver had a epaleptic fit. My freind drove his car back home, but en-route were stopped by the old bill.
LMFAO.And that's supposed to be a good reason.
B0llocks mate.
6 points and a big fine.
So if you get the book thrown at you, you can only expect it!
Forums | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


