son has received summons
son has received summons
Author
Discussion

Apache

Original Poster:

39,731 posts

315 months

Tuesday 18th September 2007
quotequote all
For doing 100/110 on the A120 at Dunmow. He was spotted by an unmarked car who tailed him noting the speed. Can anyone give me an idea of what he'll get?

Is it best he attend or plead guilty by post?

Edited by Apache on Tuesday 18th September 17:11

mrmr96

13,736 posts

235 months

Tuesday 18th September 2007
quotequote all
At that speed he'll get a summons to court becasue its more likely than not he'll recieve a ban. You must turn up at court as you can't be banned in your abscence. Also, when he does go to court, make sure he's not planning on driving home - else he's bound to get spotted and done for driving whilst disqualified.

Sorry it's not good news.

Was he stopped and spoken to at the time? Do you know what speed he's been accused of? Also, what type of road was it?


Edited to add:
Here's a link to the magistrates guidelines:
http://www.pepipoo.com/Magistrates_guidelines.htm

Edited again to add:
Here's a link to what other people have (claimed to) got in the past:
http://www.speed-trap.co.uk/Accused_Home/SpeedVSFi...

And here's some more:
http://www.pistonheads.co.uk/speed/results.asp

He'll need a very good reason why he needs his license in order to avoid a ban. A letter from work saying he'll lose his job if he's banned is a good starting point. I'm sure other's will be along shortly to offer advice on how to minimise the chance of a ban, but if I were you I wouldn't kid yourself or your Son. Unfortunaltly at 110mph chances of avoiding a ban are slim, so I'd start preparing for the worst. (Then anything less will be a bonus, rather than preparing for the best and getting a kick in the teeth when the worst happens.. if you see what I mean.)

Edited by mrmr96 on Tuesday 18th September 17:21


Edited by mrmr96 on Tuesday 18th September 17:23

Jeremy Kyle

172 posts

231 months

Tuesday 18th September 2007
quotequote all
im no expert but from previous posts it seems over a 100 gets you a ban so its gonna depend on what speed BIB give. hopefully nearer 100 (or pray less than 100) then 110 as then he may get away with a large fine. look through previous threads to see average fines/bans.

it maybe useful to adopt a disabled child or at least make sure someone is dependent on him driving as this will stop a ban!

Apache

Original Poster:

39,731 posts

315 months

Tuesday 18th September 2007
quotequote all
mrmr96 said:
At that speed he'll get a summons to court becasue its more likely than not he'll recieve a ban. You must turn up at court as you can't be banned in your abscence. Also, when he does go to court, make sure he's not planning on driving home - else he's bound to get spotted and done for driving whilst disqualified.

Sorry it's not good news.

Was he stopped and spoken to at the time? Do you know what speed he's been accused of? Also, what type of road was it?


Edited by mrmr96 on Tuesday 18th September 17:17
form says it'll cost £45 to plead guilty by post, £60 proved in absence

70mph dual carriageway

offence = excess speed 70mph limit (offence code 3833) so it doesn't appear to specify

mrmr96

13,736 posts

235 months

Tuesday 18th September 2007
quotequote all
I think those costs are court costs rather than an indication of the fine.

Is there a police witness statement in the pack that came with the summons? The offence will often just say "exceeding Xmph limit" but in the police statement it will say the speed he was caught at and how it was measured.

Also, I still think that you can't be banned in your abscence. So I would imagine that if found guilty in his abscence he would be sent another subsequent summons to appear, when he would be given the ban. (This wouldn't be a full hearing, as that would happen on the first court date - this would just be sentencing, if I understand the system correctly.)

Can I just double check that you live in England and the issuing police for is English? (Scotland have different rules you see)

Edited by mrmr96 on Tuesday 18th September 17:45

Apache

Original Poster:

39,731 posts

315 months

Tuesday 18th September 2007
quotequote all
mrmr96 said:
I think those costs are court costs rather than an indication of the fine.

Is there a police witness statement in the pack that came with the summons? The offence will often just say "exceeding Xmph limit" but in the police statement it will say the speed he was caught at and how it was measured.

Also, I still think that you can't be banned in your abscence. So I would imagine that if found guilty in his abscence he would be sent another subsequent summons to appear, when he would be given the ban. (This wouldn't be a full hearing, as that would happen on the first court date - this would just be sentencing, if I understand the system correctly.)

Can I just double check that you live in England and the issuing police for is English? (Scotland have different rules you see)

Edited by mrmr96 on Tuesday 18th September 17:45
Yes England.

witness statement says "I estimated that this vehicle was travelling in excess of 70mph . I commenced a check of this vehicles speed by way of a follow and maintained a distance behind the vehicle of 250metres. I checked the speed of this vehicle over a measured distance of 1 mile and saw that its speed indicated on the calibrated speedometer of the police vehicle varied between 100 and 110 mph, as I was unable to stop the vehicle I recorded all details"

SplatSpeed

7,491 posts

282 months

Tuesday 18th September 2007
quotequote all
deny it wasn't me

shaggy said

Apache

Original Poster:

39,731 posts

315 months

Tuesday 18th September 2007
quotequote all
Apparently this is BS he was doing about 80mph and they were chasing another car, a Jeep Cherokee, which had overtaken him, he pulled over as the cops came alongside, looked at him and continued after the other car in their T5

Has he got he a hope? My opinion of plod is really plummeting right now.



Edited by Apache on Tuesday 18th September 19:23

wasted years

4,330 posts

240 months

Tuesday 18th September 2007
quotequote all
Apache said:
Apparently this is BS he was doing about 80mph and they were chasing another car, he pulled over they came alongside, looked at him and continued after the other car
Where did that come from?

Apache

Original Poster:

39,731 posts

315 months

Tuesday 18th September 2007
quotequote all
wasted years said:
Apache said:
Apparently this is BS he was doing about 80mph and they were chasing another car, he pulled over they came alongside, looked at him and continued after the other car
Where did that come from?
Just spoken to my son

safespeed

2,983 posts

305 months

Tuesday 18th September 2007
quotequote all
Apache said:
Apparently this is BS he was doing about 80mph and they were chasing another car, a Jeep Cherokee, which had overtaken him, he pulled over as the cops came alongside, looked at him and continued after the other car in their T5

Has he got he a hope? My opinion of plod is really plummeting right now.
He wasn't stopped at the time?

Was he NIPPED within 14 days?

Apache

Original Poster:

39,731 posts

315 months

Tuesday 18th September 2007
quotequote all
safespeed said:
Apache said:
Apparently this is BS he was doing about 80mph and they were chasing another car, a Jeep Cherokee, which had overtaken him, he pulled over as the cops came alongside, looked at him and continued after the other car in their T5

Has he got he a hope? My opinion of plod is really plummeting right now.
He wasn't stopped at the time?

Was he NIPPED within 14 days?
no and yes

The Griffalo

72,863 posts

270 months

Tuesday 18th September 2007
quotequote all
There's a good chance he'll get off if he pleads guilty and is related to Harriet Harman!

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

Vipers

33,525 posts

259 months

Tuesday 18th September 2007
quotequote all
Apache said:
For doing 100/110 on the A120 at Dunmow. He was spotted by an unmarked car who tailed him noting the speed. Can anyone give me an idea of what he'll get?

Is it best he attend or plead guilty by post?

Edited by Apache on Tuesday 18th September 17:11
Hopefully he will get some "Education" out of it, ie dont do it again....... as much as I have no time for speeders, I do hope the fine/ban etc is not to harsh, you didnt mention his age, I think we all sped when we were young, but we learn with age, dont we? OK fluffy not need to respond on this one.

smile

safespeed

2,983 posts

305 months

Tuesday 18th September 2007
quotequote all
Apache said:
safespeed said:
Apache said:
Apparently this is BS he was doing about 80mph and they were chasing another car, a Jeep Cherokee, which had overtaken him, he pulled over as the cops came alongside, looked at him and continued after the other car in their T5

Has he got he a hope? My opinion of plod is really plummeting right now.
He wasn't stopped at the time?

Was he NIPPED within 14 days?
no and yes
That's very unusual. Police almost always stop for speeding.

Any chance that the offence was a camera one at a slightly different time/place?

What did the NIP say? ("...this allegation is supported by photographic evidence" Perhaps?)

Apache

Original Poster:

39,731 posts

315 months

Tuesday 18th September 2007
quotequote all
Vipers said:
Apache said:
For doing 100/110 on the A120 at Dunmow. He was spotted by an unmarked car who tailed him noting the speed. Can anyone give me an idea of what he'll get?

Is it best he attend or plead guilty by post?

Edited by Apache on Tuesday 18th September 17:11
Hopefully he will get some "Education" out of it, ie dont do it again....... as much as I have no time for speeders, I do hope the fine/ban etc is not to harsh, you didnt mention his age, I think we all sped when we were young, but we learn with age, dont we? OK fluffy not need to respond on this one.

smile
As I said before, he maintains he wasn't doing anything like that speed.....and knowing his car I believe him.

He's 23 and would lose his job if he lost his licence which is why he's careful.

vincenz

695 posts

263 months

Wednesday 19th September 2007
quotequote all
Go on what type of car was it?
I'd ask for teh evidence they have

PeteG

4,278 posts

242 months

Wednesday 19th September 2007
quotequote all
On that speed-trap.co.uk site, I saw this -

"Temporary speed limits.
You should note that exceeding a temporary speed limit is a non-endorsable offence. This means that you can only get a fine, but not have any endorsements (points) applied to your license. Of course, like most things in law, there is an exception, and in this case it's national speed limits (ie. motorways and dual carriageways). If you exceed a temporary limit on a motorway, such as in roadworks, or the controlled-speed section of the M25, then it becomes an endorsable offence, ie. points. This information is in some dispute at the moment, but came from a traffic officer undergoing basic traffic training so I have no reason to believe that it's false."

Not very well written, am I right in thinking it is, frankly, codswallop, and that any breaches of any (properly signed, etc, etc) limit, successfully prosecuted, gets you points?

Not that I break red ringed limits, I'm just curious.

Regards
Pete

shocker-z

554 posts

249 months

Wednesday 19th September 2007
quotequote all
Apache said:
Apparently this is BS he was doing about 80mph and they were chasing another car, a Jeep Cherokee, which had overtaken him, he pulled over as the cops came alongside, looked at him and continued after the other car in their T5

Has he got he a hope? My opinion of plod is really plummeting right now.



Edited by Apache on Tuesday 18th September 19:23
That's only 1mph over 10%+2 not too bad really. Have the police got evidence that he was doing 80mph? if they were on another chase how could they safley wait to measure his speed correctly and then carry on?

Liam

vonhosen

40,597 posts

248 months

Wednesday 19th September 2007
quotequote all
safespeed said:
Apache said:
safespeed said:
Apache said:
Apparently this is BS he was doing about 80mph and they were chasing another car, a Jeep Cherokee, which had overtaken him, he pulled over as the cops came alongside, looked at him and continued after the other car in their T5

Has he got he a hope? My opinion of plod is really plummeting right now.
He wasn't stopped at the time?

Was he NIPPED within 14 days?
no and yes
That's very unusual. Police almost always stop for speeding.

Any chance that the offence was a camera one at a slightly different time/place?

What did the NIP say? ("...this allegation is supported by photographic evidence" Perhaps?)
They couldn't stop him & the Jeep that was going faster than him, but they've decided that both warranted prosecution (at least that's what it looks like from the info here.)

I thought that's what you wanted, Police officers using their judgment.
Or is that that you only want them doing that when the conclusion is no prosecution ?