Legality of this number plate (pic)
Legality of this number plate (pic)
Author
Discussion

Bingo Brian

Original Poster:

90 posts

229 months

Sunday 11th November 2007
quotequote all
Have sourced some legal plates for a new car that I now need to fit. I am finding it impossible to find regs on mounting a plate though - its all about the font and layout design via DVLA/Direct gov.

As its an import, and not type approved, you can be allowed to fit a slightly smaller plate to it if it makes reasonable sense to do so. [http://www.opsi.gov.uk/SI/si2002/20022687.htm] As the whacking great big one currently obscures the intercooler, is un-aerodynamic, kills flow to brakes and looks damn ugly to boot, I quite fancy fitting the new 5 digit reg one driver side on the bumper. Here is current mega one with proposed new plate loosley dangled to left of it.


Any ideas on legality guys - esp on these legally stamped and made plates as I have no wish to cause anyone any grief (least of all me!) but the aesthetic matters!

Cheers

Peter Ward

2,097 posts

287 months

Sunday 11th November 2007
quotequote all
I am not an expert, but I do remember reading experts' opinions. As long as you allow the required space between the letters and the edge of the plate, it's legal even if the plate ends up smaller than a normal one. Of course it would have to have all the new legal gubbins of maker's postcode etc.

As for positioning, is there any chance you could put it in the same place as the current large one? Would it still interfere with cooling air given it's so small? Just a thought. Certainly the Alfas have offset plates so there's no issue in principle with not having it central.

Munter

31,331 posts

272 months

Sunday 11th November 2007
quotequote all
Compare it to the Alphas. They are offset to one side of the car like that. Now you might even be able to use one of their plate holders to make it face a bit more forward which I think might be the problem if there is one.

wasted years

4,330 posts

240 months

Sunday 11th November 2007
quotequote all
Peter Ward said:
I am not an expert, but I do remember reading experts' opinions. As long as you allow the required space between the letters and the edge of the plate, it's legal even if the plate ends up smaller than a normal one. Of course it would have to have all the new legal gubbins of maker's postcode etc.
Wot 'e said yes

Satsuma

300 posts

263 months

Sunday 11th November 2007
quotequote all
you could always get a sticky one and put it on the bonnet...?

Hooli

32,278 posts

231 months

Sunday 11th November 2007
quotequote all
Satsuma said:
you could always get a sticky one and put it on the bonnet...?
not legal anymore

Bibbs

3,754 posts

241 months

Sunday 11th November 2007
quotequote all
Non EU cars can have motorbike sized lettering if there isn't room to mount them.

http://www.dvla.gov.uk/media/pdf/leaflets/displayo...

Page 3 ..

Mine is now off to one side.

http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g54/Bibbs_1977/S...

I moved it to improve airflow through the front.

Edited by Bibbs on Sunday 11th November 21:28

BadgerBenji

3,534 posts

249 months

Sunday 11th November 2007
quotequote all
Not trying to start trouble, but why can Honda main dealers mount the number plate on an s2000 in the correct place, and you chose not to based on the grounds of air flow?

Edited by BadgerBenji on Sunday 11th November 21:58

Bibbs

3,754 posts

241 months

Sunday 11th November 2007
quotequote all
BadgerBenji said:
Not trying to start trouble, but why can Honda main dealers mount the number plate on an s2000 in the correct place, and you chose not to based on the grounds of air flow?

Edited by BadgerBenji on Sunday 11th November 21:58
Mine is an import. The UK cars have extra holes in the bumper for the number plate mount to go. I don't have those holes, or the mount.

I tried mounting the plate in the main rad area, I think it was causing airflow issues. I would mount it on the nose, but I can't find any way to fix it due to the curvature and narrowness that wouldn't have it falling off.

I've tried several places now. That's where it is at the moment.


BadgerBenji

3,534 posts

249 months

Sunday 11th November 2007
quotequote all
Bibbs said:
BadgerBenji said:
Not trying to start trouble, but why can Honda main dealers mount the number plate on an s2000 in the correct place, and you chose not to based on the grounds of air flow?

Edited by BadgerBenji on Sunday 11th November 21:58
Mine is an import. The UK cars have extra holes in the bumper for the number plate mount to go. I don't have those holes, or the mount.

I tried mounting the plate in the main rad area, I think it was causing airflow issues. I would mount it on the nose, but I can't find any way to fix it due to the curvature and narrowness that wouldn't have it falling off.

I've tried several places now. That's where it is at the moment.
Thanks for that Bibbs makes sense now, didn't know it was an import.

Bingo Brian

Original Poster:

90 posts

229 months

Sunday 11th November 2007
quotequote all
Peter Ward said:
I am not an expert, but I do remember reading experts' opinions. As long as you allow the required space between the letters and the edge of the plate, it's legal even if the plate ends up smaller than a normal one. Of course it would have to have all the new legal gubbins of maker's postcode etc.

As for positioning, is there any chance you could put it in the same place as the current large one? Would it still interfere with cooling air given it's so small? Just a thought. Certainly the Alfas have offset plates so there's no issue in principle with not having it central.
It IS a legal plate smile

I could put it where the current one is, but that isnt my preference. I'm just trying to find out if the law (or their accountants!) have a stated preference? I 'know' they need to be perpendicular, but cant find where that is defined... BB



Edited by Bingo Brian on Sunday 11th November 22:24


Edited by Bingo Brian on Sunday 11th November 22:37

Dwight VanDriver

6,583 posts

275 months

Monday 12th November 2007
quotequote all
Bibbs

Your No Plate does it comply with:

Road Vehicles Display of Reg Marks Regs 2001

This paragraph requires the plate to be fixed -



(a) vertically or, where that is not reasonably practicable, in a position as close to the vertical as is reasonably practicable,

(Yes)

(b) in such a position that in normal daylight the characters of the registration mark are easily distinguishable from every part of a relevant area having the diagonal length specified in paragraph (4). (??????????? because it is angled towards the nearside and therefore not visible from the offside of the square????)


(4) The diagonal length of the relevant area is -



(a) in the case of a mark having characters the width of which is at least 57 millimetres, 22 metres,

(b) in the case of a mark having characters the width of which is 50 millimetres, 21.5 metres,

(c) in the case of a mark having characters the width of which is 44 millimetres, 18 metres.

Maybe the photo is distorting the perspective?

dvd




Bibbs

3,754 posts

241 months

Monday 12th November 2007
quotequote all
Thanks for the info ..

So where do i need to stand and be able to read the plate?
My characters will be 44mm (I think), so it's 18m .. but standing 18m where? 18m at a 45deg angle?

It is quite slanted unfortunatly. If someone can confirm, I'll go out and check ..


(Damn it!)

JP_Midget

438 posts

242 months

Monday 12th November 2007
quotequote all
Could Bibbs put two on, one each side?

pikeyboy

2,349 posts

245 months

Monday 12th November 2007
quotequote all
this might be a bit controvesial but why not just leave it off altogether, keep it i nthe car with you andthen if you get stopped tell the officer damn its fallen off again as the mountings are a bit wonky on my import s2000, worst come to the worst its just a 30 quid fine, plus no chance of a speed camera fine from the front anyway! my mates not a had fron plate on his mx5 for about a year now and never gets any stress from the BIB.

Dwight VanDriver

6,583 posts

275 months

Monday 12th November 2007
quotequote all
Bibbs said:
Thanks for the info ..

So where do i need to stand and be able to read the plate?
My characters will be 44mm (I think), so it's 18m .. but standing 18m where? 18m at a 45deg angle?

It is quite slanted unfortunatly. If someone can confirm, I'll go out and check ..


(Damn it!)
As I see it.

Centre of VRM ...line off at 45 degrees the length of your allowed diagonal line depending on width of characters.

At the end of that line take another line off to the right and left at 45 degrees either side.

From the original point of your diagonal line at VRM likewise take line at 45 degrees, left and right and where these lines intersect with those from para above......this forms the box.

Is the plate easily readable from everywhere in that box?

It is?

Good.

So why didn't I keep my bladdy mouth shut.

dvd

Bibbs

3,754 posts

241 months

Monday 12th November 2007
quotequote all
Nope, you've lost me .. biggrin

Are you talking about a diamond (with 90 deg corners) from the centre of the plate?

I think the plate is prob at 40 degrees .. so anything over 50 and you'd struggle to see it. But if you say 45, I think it's fine (fingers crossed).

I'll check with my MOT man.

Bingo Brian

Original Poster:

90 posts

229 months

Monday 12th November 2007
quotequote all
Gosh that's complex! Diamonds???

It reads to me too that if you draw two lines directly out from the centre of the plate, with a 45 degree angle between them (even though a diamond could have MANY different angles within it (unless it is equilateral then it becomes a.... square!)) then the number plate should be visible from 18m away within these imaginary lines in this case. Need a car park, protractor, tape measure and some time now.

Seems to be nothing in the favouring either side notion? Regs favour the straight on approach - nearside could be as out of favour as offside?

BB

Bibbs

3,754 posts

241 months

Tuesday 13th November 2007
quotequote all
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/SI/si2001/20010561.htm#6

It says "diagonal area" .. but no mention about the angles of this diagonal area.
Gotta love the law.