A Shiny New One.
Discussion
I'm sure I could write an algorithm that could take the place of our police force. Should only take me a sec..
function calculatespeed(lawabidingcitizen) {
var i = form.distunits.selectedIndex;
var distunitsvalue = form.distunits.options[i].value;
var j = form.speedunits.selectedIndex;
var speedunitsvalue = form.speedunits.options[j].value;
var temp = ((parseFloat(form.hourvalue.value) * 3600) + (parseFloat(form.minutevalue.value) * 60) + parseFloat(form.secondvalue.value));
form.speedvalue.value = ((form.distvalue.value * distunitsvalue) / (temp * speedunitsvalue));
return £60FineAnd3Points;
..there.
function calculatespeed(lawabidingcitizen) {
var i = form.distunits.selectedIndex;
var distunitsvalue = form.distunits.options[i].value;
var j = form.speedunits.selectedIndex;
var speedunitsvalue = form.speedunits.options[j].value;
var temp = ((parseFloat(form.hourvalue.value) * 3600) + (parseFloat(form.minutevalue.value) * 60) + parseFloat(form.secondvalue.value));
form.speedvalue.value = ((form.distvalue.value * distunitsvalue) / (temp * speedunitsvalue));
return £60FineAnd3Points;
..there.
Edited by [AJ] on Friday 16th November 22:26
[AJ] said:
I'm sure I could write an algorithm that could take the place of our police force. Should only take me a sec..
function calculatespeed(lawabidingcitizen) {
var i = form.distunits.selectedIndex;
var distunitsvalue = form.distunits.options[i].value;
var j = form.speedunits.selectedIndex;
var speedunitsvalue = form.speedunits.options[j].value;
var temp = ((parseFloat(form.hourvalue.value) * 3600) + (parseFloat(form.minutevalue.value) * 60) + parseFloat(form.secondvalue.value));
form.speedvalue.value = ((form.distvalue.value * distunitsvalue) / (temp * speedunitsvalue));
return £60FineAnd3Points;
..there.
No, it has to be something new...function calculatespeed(lawabidingcitizen) {
var i = form.distunits.selectedIndex;
var distunitsvalue = form.distunits.options[i].value;
var j = form.speedunits.selectedIndex;
var speedunitsvalue = form.speedunits.options[j].value;
var temp = ((parseFloat(form.hourvalue.value) * 3600) + (parseFloat(form.minutevalue.value) * 60) + parseFloat(form.secondvalue.value));
form.speedvalue.value = ((form.distvalue.value * distunitsvalue) / (temp * speedunitsvalue));
return £60FineAnd3Points;
..there.
Its all concentrating on prevalent offences that can earn the treasury revenue and the Labour Party stats for solved crime to twist and rearrange as they see fit.
Mug an old lady, she dies a week later and there is no money made in fines so release the crim as it'll cost loads to jaol him and there aren't any cells available anyway.
Catch a driver on a quiet, dry, well lit motorway at midnight doing a few more than the speed limit and there's a fat bank balance of hard earned to pilfer for spending on "Schools and the Health Service" aka "MP's pay rises and expenses, Lords Expenses, extra cars for deputy PM's who don't actually do anything and er, going to war..."
mmm. that was almost a rant, for me anyway.
Mug an old lady, she dies a week later and there is no money made in fines so release the crim as it'll cost loads to jaol him and there aren't any cells available anyway.
Catch a driver on a quiet, dry, well lit motorway at midnight doing a few more than the speed limit and there's a fat bank balance of hard earned to pilfer for spending on "Schools and the Health Service" aka "MP's pay rises and expenses, Lords Expenses, extra cars for deputy PM's who don't actually do anything and er, going to war..."
mmm. that was almost a rant, for me anyway.
Edited by Oilchange on Saturday 17th November 16:37
Oilchange said:
Its all concentrating on prevalent offences that can earn the treasury revenue.
Mug an old lady, she dies a week later and there is no money made in fines so release the crim as it'll cost loads to jaol him and there aren't any cells available anyway.
Catch a driver on a quiet, dry, well lit motorway at midnight doing a few more than the speed limit and there's a fat bank balance of hard earned to pilfer for spending on "Schools and the Health Service" aka "MP's pay rises and expenses, Lords Expenses, extra cars for deputy PM's who don't actually do anything and er, going to war..."
mmm. that was almost a rant, for me anyway.
Didn't answer the question though. How about a change of Government. That should rearrange a few ridiculous laws, shouldn't it?Mug an old lady, she dies a week later and there is no money made in fines so release the crim as it'll cost loads to jaol him and there aren't any cells available anyway.
Catch a driver on a quiet, dry, well lit motorway at midnight doing a few more than the speed limit and there's a fat bank balance of hard earned to pilfer for spending on "Schools and the Health Service" aka "MP's pay rises and expenses, Lords Expenses, extra cars for deputy PM's who don't actually do anything and er, going to war..."
mmm. that was almost a rant, for me anyway.
Edited by Oilchange on Saturday 17th November 16:35
Oilchange said:
Didn't answer the question though. How about a change of Government. That should rearrange a few ridiculous laws, shouldn't it?
Yes, but it leaves the underlying problem untouched if we still have ACPO, the permanent Civil Service and a whole raft of self-serving QUANGOs snuffling at the tax-trough.We need to bin the whole smelly mess and start again.
this country is too far in the sh1t to make significant changes, it really needs to be ripped up and started again, every single government employee, councils, police, etc etc should be sacked, and forced to re-apply for their jobs on a 1yr trial basis..........................the amount of our cash that is wasted, esp by local councils and quangos is astounding, they should be accountable to us.............hey how about a new party the 'rip it up and start again-atives' got my vote.
Would I be correct in assuming that what the O.P. is getting at is that most people (at least on this site) would prefer a Justice system that pursued and punished thieves, muggers, burglers, vandals, drug-dealers and other assorted low-life scrotes with the same sort of fervent zeal and enthusiasm that they seem to reserve for 'soft-target' otherwise (apparently) law-abiding motorists who drive a few mph above the legal limit or along a deserted bus-lane?
mark69sheer said:
Governments should have a maximum of 6 yrs in office then each succesive one will get to fix the bo
ocks up of the last one before things get too far out of kilter.
They should present a manifesto that is legally binding where variance from can only be approved by an all party comitee
But it's exactly that sort of short-termism that means that our transport infrastructure is
ocks up of the last one before things get too far out of kilter.They should present a manifesto that is legally binding where variance from can only be approved by an all party comitee
ed. Probably one of the biggest failings of democracy is it's short-termism.You really want a tactical group to look at infrastructure management, deal with problems as and when they come up, and then a strategic group to look at longer term infrastructure requirements - transport, healthcare, the environment, industry etc.
This is where I think the Yanks are ahead of us, their President can serve 2 terms of 4 years. His/her popularity is tested with a 4 yearly election and everyone knows after 8 years max there will be new blood in power.
I could live with this.
And I think that 8 years is about right for any reform of criminal justice (as well as NHS etc) to have a positive effect. Hopefully.
I could live with this.
And I think that 8 years is about right for any reform of criminal justice (as well as NHS etc) to have a positive effect. Hopefully.
Edited by Oilchange on Sunday 18th November 15:47
Oilchange said:
This is where I think the Yanks are ahead of us, their President can serve 2 terms of 4 years. His/her popularity is tested with a 4 yearly election and everyone knows after 8 years max there will be new blood in power.
I could live with this.
And I think that 8 years is about right for any reform of criminal justice (as well as NHS etc) to have a positive effect. Hopefully.
Reform is highly unlikely. We live in a soft society now. It's about time we instilled some fear into the I could live with this.
And I think that 8 years is about right for any reform of criminal justice (as well as NHS etc) to have a positive effect. Hopefully.
Edited by Oilchange on Sunday 18th November 15:47
ers that have no respect for others. Lock the t
ts up, and let their respective families feed them......or they starve. Let teachers hit kids who misbehave, didn't do me any harm. Let parents smack kids who misbehave...again, didn't do me any harm. Beating, now that's different altogether, but a short sharp SLAP usually did the trick for me.Come on, we are a nation of moaners and whingers, who sit back and let change happen, usually for the worst. If you were to ask me who is to blame for todays softies.........Esther Rantzen, who pushed for more powers to protect children , and then inadvertently gave the little bastards the power to retaliate with threats of " I'll sue you", and "I want a divorce from my parents"...at that point, I would have saved the courts a lot of trouble.....there's your bag, now
off.Until fear is re-instated, no punishment will be enough! Do-gooders rule the nation, and our cells are full of petty criminals, whilst Murderers ,Rapists and terrorists do to the general public, what our legal system doesn't do to them. Scare them witless.

Rant over.
Forums | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff








