Think the police have dropped a major bo**ock....
Think the police have dropped a major bo**ock....
Author
Discussion

51mon

Original Poster:

339 posts

247 months

Tuesday 26th February 2008
quotequote all
Last week I had borrowed my brothers motor to get to work in as mine had been sold, and i'd not picked my new one up yet.

Anyway, I got a phone call this evening to say that he had recieved a letter of G.Manchester police saying that his car had been clocked at "in excess of 121 mph" on the M60. Now the only times I drove his car last week were to and from work during rush hour...... if anybody has driven on the M60 at rush hour they will realise that it would be pretty damn near impossible to do this sort of speed at this time!!

He only recieved this letter today and works nights so i havent been able to look at the exact details - time, location etc, however I am understandably rather worried about this! Hopefully it will be obvious that its a complete f*ck up and I will be able to prove that I wasnt on the motorway at this time or somethin, but if times do tie up, where do I go from here??

The only time i remember having a police car behind me was thurs or fri morning (07.00 ish) between ashton under lyne and stockport. I knew the car was there and consiously drove within the limits, is it possible this car had a dodgy camera in or something??

Any advice would be greatly appriciated. I will update the details when i see the letter.

Cheers

Si.


Chrispy Porker

17,759 posts

259 months

Tuesday 26th February 2008
quotequote all
Welcome to the world of cloned plates.

51mon

Original Poster:

339 posts

247 months

Tuesday 26th February 2008
quotequote all
Crikey!! Never thought of that, funily enough its an impreza as well so could be on to somethin there!!

I guess the letter should have all details of time, place, type of camera, type of vehicle etc, never even been pulled for anything before this in 6yrs of driving so not really sure what the procedure is!

Other thing i couldnt figure out is if it was a patrol car (as I said, not seen the letter yet), then why did i not get pulled over if i was doing anything like that speed???

Jasandjules

72,683 posts

260 months

Tuesday 26th February 2008
quotequote all
Chrispy Porker said:
Welcome to the world of cloned plates.
Ah, but you haven't given the best news yet.

He will have to PROVE that it wasn't his car...............

SS2.

14,712 posts

269 months

Tuesday 26th February 2008
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
Chrispy Porker said:
Welcome to the world of cloned plates.
Ah, but you haven't given the best news yet.

He will have to PROVE that it wasn't his car...............
Not so. If he were to assert that the vehicle involved in the alleged offence wasn't his, then it would fall to the prosecution to prove that it was (Neal v Fior, Jacob v Garland, etc)..smile


Edited by SS2. on Tuesday 26th February 21:53

rdjohn

7,195 posts

226 months

Tuesday 26th February 2008
quotequote all
51mon said:
The only time i remember having a police car behind me was thurs or fri morning (07.00 ish) between ashton under lyne and stockport.
There is a SPECS camera system on that section of the M60. The speed limit is 50mph

Parrot of Doom

23,075 posts

265 months

Tuesday 26th February 2008
quotequote all
Its one of the only places you can do 120mph too. The other is just before J17 clockwise.

Scamper

732 posts

253 months

Wednesday 27th February 2008
quotequote all
Ask for the photograph (if there is one) and then compare the car in the picture to your brothers. If there is even a tiny discrepancy when you compare them you can say its not your car and its a cloned plate.

Otherwise you are in a difficult position...having to prove yourself innocent!

LeoSayer

7,860 posts

275 months

Wednesday 27th February 2008
quotequote all
You sure he's not winding you up?

It seems to be working!

Jasandjules

72,683 posts

260 months

Wednesday 27th February 2008
quotequote all
SS2. said:
Not so. If he were to assert that the vehicle involved in the alleged offence wasn't his, then it would fall to the prosecution to prove that it was (Neal v Fior, Jacob v Garland, etc)..smile
That's certainly interesting.

Cpn Jack Spanner

2,632 posts

236 months

Wednesday 27th February 2008
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
Chrispy Porker said:
Welcome to the world of cloned plates.
Ah, but you haven't given the best news yet.

He will have to PROVE that it wasn't his car...............
Just like much of the rest of the World - he'll be asked what evidence he can supply that proves he didn't commit the crime.