Little rant about tesco's challenge 25
Little rant about tesco's challenge 25
Author
Discussion

i remember

Original Poster:

3,296 posts

215 months

Saturday 5th December 2009
quotequote all
No marks being given today for swearing as in not in such a bad mood but a quick question to the masses.

Now say if i were to buy alcohol and the woman and the checkout challenged me , me being over 18 not a problem but the person challenging is in fact under 18. Now after she did this is said "i'm not sure how you check this so ill just get someone quickly". Now two things sprung to mind at this point

A)Can this person actually challenge anyone for ID if they dont even know what theyre looking at
B)Can this person actually challenge someone if they are not properlly trained?

answers please

Pothole

34,367 posts

311 months

Saturday 5th December 2009
quotequote all
they can do what they like, you're on private property. Get annoyed if you like but it won't bother anyone but you.

f1dget

359 posts

204 months

Saturday 5th December 2009
quotequote all
I didn't think they would be allowed to sell alcohol if they were under 18.

TheEnd

15,370 posts

217 months

Saturday 5th December 2009
quotequote all
f1dget said:
I didn't think they would be allowed to sell alcohol if they were under 18.
Yea, i thought they needed to call a highly trained Doris to come over

Speed_Demon

2,662 posts

217 months

Saturday 5th December 2009
quotequote all
f1dget said:
I didn't think they would be allowed to sell alcohol if they were under 18.
Have to get permission from supervisor.

rypt

2,548 posts

219 months

Saturday 5th December 2009
quotequote all
Pothole said:
they can do what they like, you're on private property. Get annoyed if you like but it won't bother anyone but you.
Showing them ID is showing them plenty of private info, driving licenses have addresses on them for one.
By LAW, anyone handling private information has to be sufficiently trained and has to operate within the DPA ... somehow I doubt when the person doesn't know what to do that they have been trained as to how to handle the fact that the ID they see has people's addresses on them.

bananapieface

403 posts

203 months

Saturday 5th December 2009
quotequote all
How about 36yr old with id goes in Tesco with 5yr old son, does weekly shop but can't have the bottle of wine as the checktard thinks I could be buying it for my kid.

Puggit

49,798 posts

277 months

Saturday 5th December 2009
quotequote all
Does this really belong in SP&L? rolleyes

Pothole

34,367 posts

311 months

Saturday 5th December 2009
quotequote all
rypt said:
Pothole said:
they can do what they like, you're on private property. Get annoyed if you like but it won't bother anyone but you.
Showing them ID is showing them plenty of private info, driving licenses have addresses on them for one.
By LAW, anyone handling private information has to be sufficiently trained and has to operate within the DPA ... somehow I doubt when the person doesn't know what to do that they have been trained as to how to handle the fact that the ID they see has people's addresses on them.
good luck with any complaint on those grounds.

oldsoak

5,618 posts

231 months

Saturday 5th December 2009
quotequote all
Puggit said:
Does this really belong in SP&LAW? rolleyes
EFA ...erm ...Yes?

oldsoak

5,618 posts

231 months

Saturday 5th December 2009
quotequote all
bananapieface said:
How about 36yr old with id goes in Tesco with 5yr old son, does weekly shop but can't have the bottle of wine as the checktard thinks I could be buying it for my kid.
How about it? For all the Checktard knows you could be...
Anyway, in Nanny State Britain, we're supposed to be setting a good example to our offspring... Kiddie witnessing Mummy buying cheap plonk at Tesco's is hardly the way forward in that respect. They're all gonna grow up to believe that Tescos is the 'in place' to buy plonk, when we all know we should be doing our plonk buying at M&S or Waitrose...Think of the children!
getmecoat

Dimski

2,100 posts

228 months

Saturday 5th December 2009
quotequote all
oldsoak said:
bananapieface said:
How about 36yr old with id goes in Tesco with 5yr old son, does weekly shop but can't have the bottle of wine as the checktard thinks I could be buying it for my kid.
How about it? For all the Checktard knows you could be...
Anyway, in Nanny State Britain, we're supposed to be setting a good example to our offspring... Kiddie witnessing Mummy buying cheap plonk at Tesco's is hardly the way forward in that respect. They're all gonna grow up to believe that Tescos is the 'in place' to buy plonk, when we all know we should be doing our plonk buying at M&S or Waitrose...Think of the children!
getmecoat
Well, it may be an urban legend, but I've heard that Tescos, Asda etc impose severe penalties on employees who don't ask for ID, and use mystery shoppers to test staff/stores. I'm not sure how this relates to restrictions if you have your kids with you.

Rather harsh, but if true, remember this is not the fault of the checkout bod.

maser_spyder

6,356 posts

211 months

Saturday 5th December 2009
quotequote all
i remember said:
Tesco
Therein lies your problem.

I have not spent a single penny with them since 2005, and will continue this until their market share has significantly reduced.

They simply can't be trusted.

I mean, telling somebody they can't buy wine because they have a child with them? Who the hell do they think they are? The labour government?

I just can't stand being told what to do by a supermarket.

Vote with your feet. Shop elsewhere.

oldsoak

5,618 posts

231 months

Saturday 5th December 2009
quotequote all
Dimski said:
oldsoak said:
bananapieface said:
How about 36yr old with id goes in Tesco with 5yr old son, does weekly shop but can't have the bottle of wine as the checktard thinks I could be buying it for my kid.
How about it? For all the Checktard knows you could be...
Anyway, in Nanny State Britain, we're supposed to be setting a good example to our offspring... Kiddie witnessing Mummy buying cheap plonk at Tesco's is hardly the way forward in that respect. They're all gonna grow up to believe that Tescos is the 'in place' to buy plonk, when we all know we should be doing our plonk buying at M&S or Waitrose...Think of the children!
getmecoat
Well, it may be an urban legend, but I've heard that Tescos, Asda etc impose severe penalties on employees who don't ask for ID, and use mystery shoppers to test staff/stores. I'm not sure how this relates to restrictions if you have your kids with you.

Rather harsh, but if true, remember this is not the fault of the checkout bod.
This is why they're doing what they're doing... http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/re...
smile

ExChrispy Porker

17,703 posts

257 months

Saturday 5th December 2009
quotequote all
My daughters ( 23 and 21) went to the Co-op this evening.
23 year old is paying and has ID. She wants to buy some cider, but is refused as 21 year old ( who has no ID ) is with her. Not buying anything, just with her. The whole system is a joke IMO.

oldsoak

5,618 posts

231 months

Saturday 5th December 2009
quotequote all
ExChrispy Porker said:
My daughters ( 23 and 21) went to the Co-op this evening.
23 year old is paying and has ID. She wants to buy some cider, but is refused as 21 year old ( who has no ID ) is with her. Not buying anything, just with her. The whole system is a joke IMO.
I agree. It's open to such a broad spectrum of interpretation as to be all but useless at achieving what it was set out to do...prevent under age people getting hold of or buying alcohol.
Any initiative like this needs to be tempered with a little common sense...but not many people posses that these days nor do they have the ability to apply it to the situation they may be asked to adjudicate upon.
Once upon a time a store manager would be a kindly old chap who had worked his way through the ranks and grown to know the ins and outs of the trade and how to deal with customers...I defy anyone to find a supermarket store manager who is by comparison not still 'wet behind the ears'...if you get my drift?

TheEnd

15,370 posts

217 months

Saturday 5th December 2009
quotequote all
oldsoak said:
This is why they're doing what they're doing... http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/re...
smile
After they mess up, 3 months in a row, they decide to punish every customer in the UK.

Mojooo

13,291 posts

209 months

Saturday 5th December 2009
quotequote all
A large sainsburys also had their licence removed for a short period for a similar thing.


oldsoak

5,618 posts

231 months

Saturday 5th December 2009
quotequote all
TheEnd said:
oldsoak said:
This is why they're doing what they're doing... http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/re...
smile
After they mess up, 3 months in a row, they decide to punish every customer in the UK.
No you're getting rather emotional there...only those challenged and who were unable to satisfy the ID criteria are being 'punished'...thousands and thousands of customers pass through the checkouts daily without a hitch...yet we only seem to hear about those who experience these problems...Selective reporting? Surely not?

Daston

6,149 posts

232 months

Saturday 5th December 2009
quotequote all
What really annoys me is when they dont serve you because the person your with looks under 25! I get this all the time when my Gf comes with me (she is 25).

Now do they tell anyone with small children/prams that they cant be served because they have someone under 25 with them.