Blanket 20mph limit across England
Blanket 20mph limit across England
Author
Discussion

CoolHands

Original Poster:

22,971 posts

222 months

Wednesday 10th June
quotequote all
This is clearly happening. Why did wales have to implement theirs with statutory instrument whereas it’s happening all across England with no consultation; no legislative changes approved by parliament like in wales?

Stu R

21,585 posts

242 months

Wednesday 10th June
quotequote all
Wales changed the default by statute. England is free to do the same at the national level, it just hasn't, so it's done on a local basis mainly by TRO.

CoolHands

Original Poster:

22,971 posts

222 months

Wednesday 10th June
quotequote all
So is every change having a revised TRO then, is that how they do it? It’s happening in road after road after road. I haven’t seen any notices go up about potential changes to TROs if they need to when being changed (I don’t know). I guess not.

Stu R

21,585 posts

242 months

Thursday 11th June
quotequote all
CoolHands said:
So is every change having a revised TRO then, is that how they do it? It s happening in road after road after road. I haven t seen any notices go up about potential changes to TROs if they need to when being changed (I don t know). I guess not.
It doesn t have to be one road, one TRO. Councils can carpet bomb an area with a TRO covering a batch of roads. The consultation/notice can be just a council legal notice rather than something obvious on every street.

Here's an example https://www.sheffield.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2...

WyrleyD

2,317 posts

175 months

Friday 12th June
quotequote all
It's been implemented in two towns near where I live, don't recall seeing anything publicised in the local press about it just overnight 20mph signs went up.

drmike37

614 posts

83 months

Friday 12th June
quotequote all
There seems no rhyme or reason. 20mph limits go up in some places, but in our village where we actually want one (village school etc) nothing happens.

Steve-B

963 posts

309 months

Friday 12th June
quotequote all
The whole of Oxon is crippled everywhere from what I've experienced just because the greenloons in Oxford wanted it for there.
The second you go over the border from Bucks, etc in a town with a 30 it drops with nary a warning.
You'd not know you'd just crossed the border in a couple villages as the only 20 signs I've seen are at the entrances.
I think the whole county must hate car owners to enact such a crazily low limit, especially without full "Black Spot" (etc...) justification and it's just a tidy little money maker!

AndrewGP

2,082 posts

189 months

Friday 12th June
quotequote all
Living on the edge of Oxfordshire, and driving within the county most of the time, I despair of the anti-car attitude the County Council has.

They spend huge sums of money on largely pointless 20mph limits (I admit a few are probably worthwhile, however most definitely aren’t) but the road surface is littered with potholes, cracks and sunken drains, and has been for months with no sign of even a temporary repair.

ac.cobra

126 posts

53 months

Saturday 13th June
quotequote all
One scheme is to generate money from the motorists and the other is not to spend money.
Don't loose your hard earned money. You all know in which direction the country is moving.

Glitzy Mitzy

1,451 posts

55 months

Tuesday 16th June
quotequote all
And yet, in sunny Essex, there's barely a twenty limit to be seen. We're suffering from the scourge of the vanishing national, however; lots of things that were national limit have now been changed, arbitrarily, to fifty or even forty. Nothing is actually enforced, though, least of all by the police.

xx99xx

2,873 posts

100 months

Tuesday 16th June
quotequote all
ac.cobra said:
One scheme is to generate money from the motorists and the other is not to spend money.
Don't loose your hard earned money. You all know in which direction the country is moving.
Local highway authorities don't receive the money from speeding fines.

If they did, I'm sure speed cameras would be even more prevalent.

BlueJazz

858 posts

199 months

Sunday 28th June
quotequote all
https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15935039/EU...

"Radical road safety reforms being considered by the European Commission would require every new vehicle to be fitted with a device that limits engine power for anyone driving too fast."

One way to enforce that 20mph speed limit!

Tracklover

104 posts

1 month

Sunday 28th June
quotequote all
Steve-B said:
The whole of Oxon is crippled everywhere from what I've experienced just because the greenloons in Oxford wanted it for there.
The second you go over the border from Bucks, etc in a town with a 30 it drops with nary a warning.
You'd not know you'd just crossed the border in a couple villages as the only 20 signs I've seen are at the entrances.
I think the whole county must hate car owners to enact such a crazily low limit, especially without full "Black Spot" (etc...) justification and it's just a tidy little money maker!
Or maybe it's because the survival rate of being hit by a car at 20mph is VASTLY better than 30mph?

7 times less likely to die iirc.

dundarach

6,150 posts

255 months

Sunday 28th June
quotequote all
On a motoring forum, surely people can see that because more and more people are driving like tts, we face more and more of this st.

On balance of those making the rules, do you really think there's more of them who want to drive slowly, no, they're being forced into this st, because on the whole the masses are thick s.

It's the same reason I can no longer have a peaceful wk, too many lazy arsed parents moaning that social media is parenting their kids. So now my porn is blocked.

I can't enjoy full fat coke with paying for it and having that annoying kid flapping about.

If you give up all your responsibility to behave, the government steps in!

Furbo

3,884 posts

59 months

Sunday 28th June
quotequote all
dundarach said:
On a motoring forum, surely people can see that because more and more people are driving like tts, we face more and more of this st.

On balance of those making the rules, do you really think there's more of them who want to drive slowly, no, they're being forced into this st, because on the whole the masses are thick s.

It's the same reason I can no longer have a peaceful wk, too many lazy arsed parents moaning that social media is parenting their kids. So now my porn is blocked.

I can't enjoy full fat coke with paying for it and having that annoying kid flapping about.

If you give up all your responsibility to behave, the government steps in!
Ah, you think we caused the problem and it's nothing to do with politics. Not sure I agree with you.

dundarach

6,150 posts

255 months

Sunday 28th June
quotequote all
Furbo said:
Ah, you think we caused the problem and it's nothing to do with politics. Not sure I agree with you.
The royal we, yes.

Politicians are trying to balance different groups of moaners against different groups of voters


dxg

10,512 posts

287 months

Sunday 28th June
quotequote all
Round my way, there's been a wave of speed reductions, but - sneakily - by removing signage to extend the boundaries of lower limits.

No publicity - no temporary signs to point out the change. Result - lots of people still bombing around under the original limits.

Riley Blue

23,203 posts

253 months

Sunday 28th June
quotequote all
When the houses here went up in 2005 there was TRO for a 20mph limit, mini-roundabout and speed bumps.

None of them materialised. I'm probably the only resident to know about them and I ain't squealing.

eldar

25,100 posts

223 months

Sunday 28th June
quotequote all
Tracklover said:
Steve-B said:
The whole of Oxon is crippled everywhere from what I've experienced just because the greenloons in Oxford wanted it for there.
The second you go over the border from Bucks, etc in a town with a 30 it drops with nary a warning.
You'd not know you'd just crossed the border in a couple villages as the only 20 signs I've seen are at the entrances.
I think the whole county must hate car owners to enact such a crazily low limit, especially without full "Black Spot" (etc...) justification and it's just a tidy little money maker!
Or maybe it's because the survival rate of being hit by a car at 20mph is VASTLY better than 30mph?

7 times less likely to die iirc.
And certain to live at 0mph, think of the kiddies, etc.

Biker 1

8,514 posts

146 months

Sunday 28th June
quotequote all
All this nonsense of people less likely to die if hit at 20 rather than 30. What are they doing in the road in the first place? What happened to the likes of the green cross code? Are people that thick that they can't teach their kids to cross the road at a pelican crossing?? How about banning J walking? Surely it would save millions of lives??