Man prosecuted for taking dead deer
Man prosecuted for taking dead deer
Author
Discussion

otolith

Original Poster:

69,280 posts

234 months

Tuesday 8th September
quotequote all
Given how overstretched our justice system is, how on earth is this in the public interest?

https://www.darlingtonandstocktontimes.co.uk/news/...

Foss62

2,025 posts

95 months

Tuesday 8th September
quotequote all
Seems like madness to me. It also calls into question what most people believe regarding roadkill - that as long as you didn’t hit it yourself, you can take it.
The landowner here, is presumably the highways authority?

bobtail4x4

4,425 posts

139 months

Tuesday 8th September
quotequote all
its theft

it belongs to whoever owns the land it died on,

must be more to this,

Hereward

5,128 posts

260 months

Tuesday 8th September
quotequote all
May be one of those cases where the letter of the law is being applied with no recourse to common sense. Hopefully common sense will now prevail.

There was a squashed fox on my road. As I was carrying it to move it into the undergrowth a police car drove by. I did a shrug and a lame smile and they drove on by. Seems like I got away with it.

Landlubber

1,609 posts

79 months

Tuesday 8th September
quotequote all
I dont think you are mate.

Courser

183 posts

3 months

Tuesday 8th September
quotequote all
If it was on a main road or roadside verge it would be the council.
They lift them and put them in the bin,

Stupid of the police to think this is a worthwhile prosecution, and who the hell decided it should go to court ?

God knows I’ve lifted plenty, usually in front of the person who hit it.
On one occasion the driver was on the phone to the police so I told them directly I was taking it, they were quite happy.
The drivers face when I folded it into the boot of an MX5 was a picture.

I’ve also killed a fair number of deer that had been hit by cars just as I was passing ( dense population of Roe in my area)

Courser

183 posts

3 months

Tuesday 8th September
quotequote all
Hereward said:
May be one of those cases where the letter of the law is being applied with no recourse to common sense. Hopefully common sense will now prevail.

There was a squashed fox on my road. As I was carrying it to move it into the undergrowth a police car drove by. I did a shrug and a lame smile and they drove on by. Seems like I got away with it.
This law only applies to deer.

LunarOne

7,333 posts

167 months

Tuesday 8th September
quotequote all
A friend of mine spends a significant portion of his time shooting deer at the behest of the landowner, and he takes many of them home to gralloch and butcher.

He told me many years ago that anyone may take roadkill as long as they were not involved in the death of the animal itself - and I must admit that this was already my understanding of the law. If it isn't correct, then it does nevertheless seem to be prevailing wisdom.

I remember him being hauled in front of HR after parking in the office car park with a dead deer (which he'd come across on his way to work) hanging from one of his roof rails. He'd made every effort to park at the far end of the car park with the carcass facing towards the woods that surrounded the car park so as not to alarm anyone, but someone still made a complaint.

Anyway, I think it's pretty ridiculous that the police have taken it this far.

Hereward

5,128 posts

260 months

Tuesday 8th September
quotequote all
Courser said:
This law only applies to deer.
Doh, thanks, I hadn't processed that key bit of information.

Starfighter

5,351 posts

208 months

Tuesday 8th September
quotequote all
That could create some unintended consequences. If a person were to hit a dead der deer causing damage does the driver then have a claim on National Highways?

LunarOne

7,333 posts

167 months

Tuesday 8th September
quotequote all
Starfighter said:
That could create some unintended consequences. If a person were to hit a dead der deer causing damage does the driver then have a claim on National Highways?
I don't see how if they only become the property of National Highways upon death.

Leptons

5,493 posts

206 months

Tuesday 8th September
quotequote all
Is this the same Durham police that allowed a large crowd to gather, release balloons and set fire to stolen cars unchallenged last week?

Mumsnet

155 posts

5 months

Wednesday 9th September
quotequote all
Hereward said:
Courser said:
This law only applies to deer.
Doh, thanks....
A female deer? [/Simpsons Movie]

Hereward

5,128 posts

260 months

Wednesday 9th September
quotequote all
Mumsnet said:
Hereward said:
Courser said:
This law only applies to deer.
Doh, thanks....
A female deer? [/Simpsons Movie]
I've no idea (geddit?).

Yellow Lizud

2,967 posts

194 months

Wednesday 9th September
quotequote all
Hereward said:
Mumsnet said:
Hereward said:
Courser said:
This law only applies to deer.
Doh, thanks....
A female deer? [/Simpsons Movie]
I've no idea (geddit?).
That's a blind elk, completely different!

Pica-Pica

16,650 posts

114 months

Wednesday 9th September
quotequote all
Yellow Lizud said:
Hereward said:
Mumsnet said:
Hereward said:
Courser said:
This law only applies to deer.
Doh, thanks....
A female deer? [/Simpsons Movie]
I've no idea (geddit?).
That's a blind elk, completely different!
Still no idea, that's a dead, blind elk.

wc98

12,735 posts

170 months

Friday 11th September
quotequote all
This is another one of those situations that most people find ludicrous. I don';t care if it's the law, it's a ste law and the muppets that spent all the time on the public dime writing it into legislation all need removed from the gene pool and the Police in question need a loud word from their Sergeant not to be so utterly fking stupid the next time they see someone doing this.

This is definitely a situation that justifies the response "shouldn't you be out catching real criminals".

CMTMB

2,065 posts

25 months

Friday 11th September
quotequote all
Can the police be charged with wasting police time? Unless there's a lot more to the story than we're being told that seems like a complete waste of important resources.

paulrockliffe

16,606 posts

257 months

Friday 11th September
quotequote all
I presume the more to it than reported is that he stopped on the A66 and this was an easier prosecution than dealing with the danger he caused getting the deer off the road?

tight fart

3,600 posts

303 months

Friday 11th September
quotequote all
I keep seeing this
"A country that punishes people for fishing without a license, but not for crossing its borders illegally, is a country governed by idiots."
But it does apply equally apply to dead dear.