The Hustle
Author
Discussion

badbeachbuggy

Original Poster:

5,459 posts

258 months

Saturday 17th December 2005
quotequote all
Went to a pool night with some people I used to work with the other night. I had to take them without a flash so I didn't put people off thier shots! Not much light so I cranked the ISO right up but I think it's made some interesting moody shots.



















































badbeachbuggy

Original Poster:

5,459 posts

258 months

Saturday 17th December 2005
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]


It was a drink up

beano500

20,854 posts

298 months

Saturday 17th December 2005
quotequote all
It'd be an expensive job trying to get the tables level too...





You might just have to accept that, without a Wonk Reduction lens, you'll have to compromise...


...or do some fiddly-fiddly in Photoshop.


Or just face up to these people and explain you can't do anything if they won't stand up STRAIGHT






Nice moody shots btw - exactly the feeling to aim for, IMHO.

simpo two

91,107 posts

288 months

Saturday 17th December 2005
quotequote all
I like the ambient lighting and BW treatment, though I could do without some of the drunken angles and only a few of the shots work for me as standalone photos, eg:



- though the focus should really be on the eyes not the hand IMO. A lot of the rest just look lke shots of people playing pool and the b/gs are distracting. If you take a bit more care over composition, focus point and timing next time, you should get some really good ones.

>> Edited by simpo two on Saturday 17th December 10:22

Don

28,378 posts

307 months

Saturday 17th December 2005
quotequote all


Like this one very much. Has a very "Chicago Blues" mood to it. The attractive young lady's outfit does a nice job of "Americanising".

All the above IMO only of course. Nice work, though!

_dobbo_

14,619 posts

271 months

Saturday 17th December 2005
quotequote all
I like these Nick, I always look at your
threads with interest as you seem to
have a real eye for unusual composition.

In my opinion, the angles here are what make these work,
it makes them a bit more edgy, which i'm guessing is what you were
going for.

I'm a huge fan of shooting in low light without flash, it's
a real challenge which makes it so much more rewarding
when you get a good one.

badbeachbuggy

Original Poster:

5,459 posts

258 months

Sunday 18th December 2005
quotequote all
Thanks guys

For next time I would take a faster lens, I only had my 28-300 zoom with me and it doesn't stop down more than f4.

simpo two

91,107 posts

288 months

Sunday 18th December 2005
quotequote all
badbeachbuggy said:
For next time I would take a faster lens, I only had my 28-300 zoom with me and it doesn't stop down more than f4.

I sensed you were struggling for shutter speed. A 50mm f1.8 is a cheap way to get more light in (£70-80), and it doesn't take up much room in the bag. A bit long for some work but if you go wider the price goes up dramatically.

up-the-dubs

4,282 posts

252 months

Sunday 18th December 2005
quotequote all
What did John Towers have to say for himself anyway?





Nice pics though

badbeachbuggy

Original Poster:

5,459 posts

258 months

Sunday 18th December 2005
quotequote all
simpo two said:
A 50mm f1.8 is a cheap way to get more light in (£70-80), and it doesn't take up much room in the bag. A bit long for some work but if you go wider the price goes up dramatically.


I've got one awell, just didn't have it with me! I guess that's the lesson to learn

badbeachbuggy

Original Poster:

5,459 posts

258 months

Sunday 18th December 2005
quotequote all
up-the-dubs said:
What did John Towers have to say for himself anyway?


Who?

simpo two

91,107 posts

288 months

Sunday 18th December 2005
quotequote all
badbeachbuggy said:
up-the-dubs said:
What did John Towers have to say for himself anyway?


Who?


Geezer who ran off with the Rover millions I think?

up-the-dubs

4,282 posts

252 months

Monday 19th December 2005
quotequote all
simpo two said:
badbeachbuggy said:
up-the-dubs said:
What did John Towers have to say for himself anyway?


Who?


Geezer who ran off with the Rover millions I think?


A fairly close lookalike, no?