Jaguar 3.2 V8
Jaguar 3.2 V8
Author
Discussion

cb500t

Original Poster:

149 posts

110 months

Tuesday 13th February 2018
quotequote all
Anyone ever tried to fit one into an S?

v8s4me

7,268 posts

241 months

Tuesday 13th February 2018
quotequote all
Like THIS?

TVRees

1,086 posts

134 months

Tuesday 13th February 2018
quotequote all
Isn't that a V6 ?

O P mentioned a V8.

anonymous-user

76 months

Tuesday 13th February 2018
quotequote all
There are no cheap or easy solutions for attaching a manual transmission to the Jaguar V8s.

v8s4me

7,268 posts

241 months

Tuesday 13th February 2018
quotequote all
TVRees said:
Isn't that a V6 ?....
It is.

TVRees said:
......O P mentioned a V8.
Opps wink

greymrj

3,329 posts

226 months

Tuesday 13th February 2018
quotequote all
Search on PH and you will find a few bits about this engine. It doesnt appear that well liked. At c240bhp why would it be better than the Rover V8? Apparently it has poor economy too. No personal knowledge though.

v8s4me

7,268 posts

241 months

Tuesday 13th February 2018
quotequote all
greymrj said:
S.... At c240bhp why would it be better than the Rover V8? Apparently it has poor economy too. No personal knowledge though.
And taking into consideration the cost of the conversion you could probably get a decent V8S for similar money.

glenrobbo

39,245 posts

172 months

Wednesday 14th February 2018
quotequote all
v8s4me said:
And taking into consideration the cost of the conversion you could probably get a decent V8S for similar money.
scratchchin
Are you selling up then Joe?

wink

v8s4me

7,268 posts

241 months

Wednesday 14th February 2018
quotequote all
glenrobbo said:
....scratchchin: Are you selling up then Joe? wink
Ha, ha laugh NO! Although maybe you could do the conversion for what I'd want for mine laugh

v8s4me

7,268 posts

241 months

Wednesday 14th February 2018
quotequote all
If you just want 200bhp then drop one of THESE in.

Probably much lighter than the RV8 so power to weight would be better. No figures quoted for torque and of course it would never sound right.

glenrobbo

39,245 posts

172 months

Wednesday 14th February 2018
quotequote all
v8s4me said:
If you just want 200bhp then drop one of THESE in.

Probably much lighter than the RV8 so power to weight would be better. No figures quoted for torque and of course it would never sound right.
But surely that's a transverse engine?
Could be rather awkward to install in an S.

v8s4me

7,268 posts

241 months

Wednesday 14th February 2018
quotequote all
glenrobbo said:
.....But surely that's a transverse engine? Could be rather awkward to install in an S.
Read the blurb thumbup

magpies

5,191 posts

204 months

Wednesday 14th February 2018
quotequote all
v8s4me said:
If you just want 200bhp then drop one of THESE in.

Probably much lighter than the RV8 so power to weight would be better. No figures quoted for torque and of course it would never sound right.
didn't TVR do a 4 pot S at some point?

zombeh

694 posts

209 months

Wednesday 14th February 2018
quotequote all
You'd have to chop out the brace between the shocks to get it in I think (it's a few inches longer than the v6) but it ought to fit easily enough if you don't mind it sounding horribly dull.

As for the Jag v8 I think it's the sort of engine you'd only consider fitting because you had one sitting around. IIRC there's a manual box that goes on it (x type diesel?) but you'd probably have to modify the chassis a fair bit to get a quad cam v8 in there and fit an exhaust in. That's not to say it's especially impossible but if you're going to that sort of effort I'd be surprised if that was the engine you chose.

I think the mazda/ford/jag v6 is the sensibleish option if you want more power in a v6 S. A bigger rover is the sensible choice in the v8