how does a v8s compare to a chimaera
how does a v8s compare to a chimaera
Author
Discussion

ssc1

Original Poster:

456 posts

283 months

Wednesday 11th June 2003
quotequote all
after lots of serching and driving around im thinking of getting a v8s , i wanted a good wedge 400/450, but the wife dont like them at all even though i think they look great, anyway having owned a chimaera 4.3 before how does a v8s measure up against it as there seems to be a few for around 10k , is the running gear the same as the chimp or not and does the big opening front end give any probs.

GreenV8S

30,999 posts

306 months

Wednesday 11th June 2003
quotequote all
They have a lot in common mechanically but very different to drive - which is probably the important thing?

griffter

4,143 posts

277 months

Thursday 12th June 2003
quotequote all
How so?

I'm undergoing the Griff/Chim/V8S purchase debate at the moment.
Persuade me I want a V8S! (Cheaper to buy = more ££ for improvements, cheaper insurance I believe?, no cats, 'classic' looks...I'm halfway there already)

AFAIK the rear suspension is the principle mechanical difference between the V8S and the early Griff/Chim - how does this manifest itself on the road?

How else does the drive differ?

OXBOW

567 posts

272 months

Thursday 12th June 2003
quotequote all
Had a couple of both and very, very, very, differant!
Chimaera easy, even in 5 lt form, and obviously more modern looks and great cabin. Probably quicker in real terms- 4.5 the best. V8s truly raucous! Loads more fun and smiles. Defo not an every day car, even thou I tried very hard to let it be. Luv em both!
P.S. Rosso pearl Tuscan best car ever!!!!!

>> Edited by OXBOW on Thursday 12th June 13:47

GreenV8S

30,999 posts

306 months

Thursday 12th June 2003
quotequote all
The S series trailing arm rear suspension gives better handling under braking (due to the anti-lift effect) but is vulnerable to wheel tramp if you like to spin the wheels from a standing start. The twin wishbone setup on te Griffith/Chimaera etcwill tramp too, but not nearly as severely as the trailing arm setup. Having said that, there are things you can do to reduce the problem on the S series, and I very rarely encounter this problem these days. The S series has been described as being more 'chuckable' than the later models, I don't know why (it is only a little bit lighter) but may be something to do with the weight of the controls and the suspension setup.

griffter

4,143 posts

277 months

Thursday 12th June 2003
quotequote all
So at the risk of hijacking this post (but not too much) can I assume:

The V8S is more fun on the bends? Or at least no less fun and possibly a bit more 'back to basics'?

All but as quick in a straight line?

A little less refined?

And more entertaining on track?

'Cos that's what I want! Thanks for views - v. useful as I'm not into blagging test drives/timewasting/driving without insurance...

GreenV8S

30,999 posts

306 months

Thursday 12th June 2003
quotequote all
V8S is slightly quicker in a straight line than the 4.0 Griffith and Chimaera, it is a fraction lighter and has lower gearing. Obviously the bigger engined models will show it a clean pair of heels.

duncscz

262 posts

273 months

Friday 13th June 2003
quotequote all
how does a v8s measure up against it as there seems to be a few for around 10k

I am also considering a V8S, but those around 10K have been advertised for a while - appreciate the V8S is more exclusive (and elusive) but do they really justify the +3K compared to the V6 (and there has been a rush of S recently advertised)?

GreenV8S

30,999 posts

306 months

Friday 13th June 2003
quotequote all
The V6 S is a great car, but when you've tried the V8 - nothing else will do!

Ren Dao

278 posts

277 months

Friday 13th June 2003
quotequote all

GreenV8S said: The V6 S is a great car, but when you've tried the V8 - nothing else will do!


Will second that !!. Tried them both but ..........