Ken Livingstone

[simonrockman]

He'll lose his battle with the Evening Standard. He should remember that it was the Standard gunning for Jeffery Archer that got Livingstone the clear shot at the office of Mayor in the first place.

The Standard is right wing, but that's not why it guns for him. It does so because he's two-faced and crap at his job.

Simon

>>> Edited by simonrockman on Friday 11th February 17:07

[vixpy1]

I think it shows a shocking lack of judgement by Ken.

[forever_driving]

What's going on? Now that I don't live in London, I don't get to read The Standard. Am I missing a good story? Anyone got a link?

[towman]

Kenneth Livingstone = Invent Honking Steel

[falcemob]

forever_driving said:

What's going on? Now that I don't live in London, I don't get to read The Standard. Am I missing a good story? Anyone got a link?

Try this http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=491057

[srebbe64]

You couldn't invent it, could you?

[Alex]

forever_driving said:

What's going on? Now that I don't live in London, I don't get to read The Standard. Am I missing a good story? Anyone got a link?

www.thisislondon.co.uk/

[sccbishop]

Disgraceful.

[jamesc]

This is just another reason why we should rid this country of this filth at all costs. This is the sort of behavior we expect from the BNP. By the way this "Gay and Lesbian" party was paid for by the Mayor's office, funded by the congestion charge! I wonder if john75 went along with jim's-a-chav?

http://news.independent.co.uk/media/story.jsp?story=609913

[jamesc]

sccbishop said:

Disgraceful.

I agree with here! Livingstone is just scum!

[simonrockman]

Vote:

www.thisislondon.co.uk/haveyoursay/polls/?itemId=16540432

[jamesc]

simonrockman said:

Vote: www.thisislondon.co.uk/haveyoursay/polls/?itemId=16540432

That vote should be "Should Livingstone resign?"

I voted yes anyway. I see 32% are scum, filth and Chavs!

[sccbishop]

jamesc said:

By the way this "Gay and Lesbian" party was paid for by the Mayor's office, funded by the congestion charge!

Yes I'm not quite sure why we had to pay for that. And does it really deserve a party ffs?

[nonegreen]

Throw him in the Tower.

[vixpy1]

nonegreen said:

Throw him in the Tower.

Don't anyone say it!!!!!!

[Balmoral Green]

vixpy1 said:

nonegreen said: Throw him in the Tower. Don't anyone say it!!!!!!

The oxylotl (newt) tower

[v8thunder]

sccbishop said:

jamesc said: By the way this "Gay and Lesbian" party was paid for by the Mayor's office, funded by the congestion charge! Yes I'm not quite sure why we had to pay for that. And does it really deserve a party ffs?

Politically speaking, a Gay and Lesbian party is undemocratic, as is a women's party, a disabled party, ethnic minority parties and so on, and should not be allowed party status. A pressure group is all they can be.

[srebbe64]

I thought a Gay & Lesbian Party was some sort of an event!

[spaximus]

The reason they fund such eventsis so they vote. There are lots of motivated people in these groups many who are anti everything most right minded PHers stand for.

[rico]

Next time you're in a cab... ask the driver what he/she thinks of Ken...

cue a full journey's speech about what a tw*at Ken is. He's ing up most of London.

Personally i couldn't care. Whoever we get is gonna cock up something or other... might as well just let it pass.