Chicken and Eggs - finally solved
Chicken and Eggs - finally solved
Author
Discussion

TheExcession

Original Poster:

11,669 posts

273 months

Saturday 12th February 2005
quotequote all
For a few months now I've been having endless rounds of discussion with our little lad (7) about which came first, the chicken or the egg?

As you can imagine it's getting a little monotonous now and his frustration at the argument is beginning to show.

However, today he managed to apply a little latteral thinking that made me smile, it went like this.

LittelEx: ".. the chicken came first..."
Ex: "But where did the chicken come from?"
LittleEx: "An egg"
Ex: "But where did that egg come from? Surely you needed a chicken to lay the egg?"
LittleEx: "Nope, God layed it"

Priceless!

best
Ex

D_Mike

5,301 posts

263 months

Saturday 12th February 2005
quotequote all
interesting. god isn't a mammal so evolutionarily we are superior to god.

sadako

7,080 posts

261 months

Saturday 12th February 2005
quotequote all
The egg came first because the genetic mutation that created the first chicken was present in the first egg, but it was layed by a non-chicken

madmike

2,372 posts

289 months

Saturday 12th February 2005
quotequote all
D_Mike said:
interesting. god isn't a mammal so evolutionarily we are superior to god.


Better yet, instead of heading off to communion Sunday to get a flavorless wafer, I'm off to KFC to get some juicy, southern fried god.

minimax

11,985 posts

279 months

Saturday 12th February 2005
quotequote all
madmike said:

D_Mike said:
interesting. god isn't a mammal so evolutionarily we are superior to god.



Better yet, instead of heading off to communion Sunday to get a flavorless wafer, I'm off to KFC to get some juicy, southern fried god.


mxdi

13,993 posts

272 months

Saturday 12th February 2005
quotequote all
A genius in the making.

After all they told me when I was at school that God made man.

BliarOut

72,863 posts

262 months

Sunday 13th February 2005
quotequote all
Ok, here's my go....

The chicken must come first. A chicken is an actual chicken, while an egg is only a potential chicken... Now IIRC actuality must always precede potentiality, ergo I'm right

Bloody KFC, I'm still on a diet

v8thunder

27,647 posts

281 months

Sunday 13th February 2005
quotequote all
All organisms formed from separating cells, which is what happens inside an egg, right?

Therefore, cells became eggs became chickens, chickens perpetuated their species through eggs. So it was the eggs.

BliarOut

72,863 posts

262 months

Sunday 13th February 2005
quotequote all
v8thunder said:
All organisms formed from separating cells, which is what happens inside an egg, right?

Err, I dunno but my answer still sounds clever

cotty

41,918 posts

307 months

Sunday 13th February 2005
quotequote all
TheExcession said:


LittelEx: ".. the chicken came first..."
Ex: "But where did the chicken come from?"
LittleEx: "An egg"
Ex: "But where did that egg come from? Surely you needed a chicken to lay the egg?"
LittleEx: "Nope, God layed it"


I know he is only young but how can the chicken come first if it came from an egg.

ill get my coat

Byff

4,427 posts

284 months

Sunday 13th February 2005
quotequote all
God created Man and Woman. They went on to create babies.

God created the Chicken that went on to lay eggs.

Simple.

BliarOut

72,863 posts

262 months

Sunday 13th February 2005
quotequote all
Byff said:
God created Man and Woman. They went on to create babies.

God created the Chicken that went on to lay eggs.

Simple.


We evolved from some fish like thingumy

love machine

7,609 posts

258 months

Sunday 13th February 2005
quotequote all
I read an interesting statement recently which I found rather profound.

Your genetic code has been ejaculated through countless thousands of penii !
There's a thought eh?

You could say that in essence the chicken was only a manifestation of its genetic code which had beginnings in the late precambrian! before eggs had been invented


>> Edited by love machine on Sunday 13th February 20:42

Plotloss

67,280 posts

293 months

Sunday 13th February 2005
quotequote all
Good lad!!

Sounds like you have a right bright one there.

It was eggs though, reptiles were around millions of years before birds...

wedg1e

27,016 posts

288 months

Sunday 13th February 2005
quotequote all
Plotloss said:
Good lad!!

Sounds like you have a right bright one there.

It was eggs though, reptiles were around millions of years before birds...



Maybe reptiles were viviparous back then?

yertis

19,546 posts

289 months

Sunday 13th February 2005
quotequote all
Here's another conundrum posited by a three year old of my acquaintance: "If a giant was infinity high, how high would his waist be?"

BliarOut

72,863 posts

262 months

Sunday 13th February 2005
quotequote all
yertis said:
Here's another conundrum posited by a three year old of my acquaintance: "If a giant was infinity high, how high would his waist be?"

Half infinity of course

D_Mike

5,301 posts

263 months

Sunday 13th February 2005
quotequote all
half infinity, obviously.

i like infinity, here is a cool trick:

imagine switching a lamp on and then off an infinite amount of times in one minute. this bit is easy - you switch it on, wait 30 seconds, switch it off, wait 15 seconds, switch it on, wait 7.5 seconds, switch it off, wait 3.25 seconds, switch it on, wait 1.625 seconds etc.

at the end of a minute is the light on or off? this is easy to work out:

+1 represents on
-1 represents off

so if we write out the infinite sum as a series S,

1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + 1 -1 + 1 - 1 +....

after even switchings the light is on (the answer is 1)
after odd switchings the light is off (answer is zero)

so to work out the state of the light after one minute we just calculate the infinite sum.

you can group terms in the series so that the eventual sum is either 0 or 1:

(1-1) + (1-1) + (1-1) +... (same as first series but with brackets, the eventual sum is 0)

or

1 + (1-1) + (1-1) + (1-1) +... (again, same as first series but with brackets, eventual sum is 1)

the series can also be written as:

S = 1 - (1-1+1-1+1-1+...) (again, just playing with brackets).

but note that the bit in the brackets in the series S above is the same as the original series (right at the top).

so S = 1 - S (by substitution of the bit in brackets above for S, because they're identical).

is S = 1 - S then:

S = S = 1

which means S = 1/2

so at the end of the infinite series of switchings the light is not on or not off. Cool eh?

cammers

396 posts

291 months

Sunday 13th February 2005
quotequote all
OK, so how about this other philosophical question...

If a tree falls in the woods and there's nobody around to hear it, does it make a sound?


D_Mike

5,301 posts

263 months

Sunday 13th February 2005
quotequote all
define sound.