The similarities between Robert Mugabe & Gordon Brown
The similarities between Robert Mugabe & Gordon Brown
Author
Discussion

Percy Flage

Original Poster:

1,770 posts

253 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
From Old Holborn, one of my favourite Blogs



Worrying.

Simpo Two

93,053 posts

296 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
Only one difference I can think of - one of them throws out foreigners.

eccles

14,408 posts

253 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
reeeeeepost!

TheEnd

15,370 posts

219 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
Mugabe has nicer suits

hornetrider

63,161 posts

236 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
TheEnd said:
Mugabe has nicer suits
And two eyes

sleep envy

62,260 posts

280 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
and a nice MB 600S Grosser

Fittster

20,120 posts

244 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
Old Holborn should at least remove the Guido Fawkes logo

http://www.order-order.com/2008/11/clunking-fist-s...

catso

16,539 posts

298 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
Mugabe's not such a slimey liar ie doesn't pretend to care...

bimsb6

8,802 posts

252 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
they are both brown .

130R

7,122 posts

237 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
bimsb6 said:
they are both brown .
laugh

Established 1984

1,237 posts

216 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
Am I the only one that gets annoyed by people spouting the he’s 'unelected' line?

FFS we don’t have an elected president in this country. We elect a party to lead the country, and they choose a leader who becomes the prime minister. Blair wasn’t elected, Thatcher wasn’t elected, Churchill wasn’t elected.

It was fairly obvious at the last election that Blair wouldn’t serve out the term and Brown would take over with no general election being called. Why do people have such difficulty understanding that this is how it works? banghead

Edit for typo

Edited by Established 1984 on Sunday 30th November 13:54

fido

18,922 posts

286 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
Established 1984 said:
Am I the only one that gets annoyed by people spouting the he’s 'unelected' line?
Yeah, i think Mugabe did get properly 'elected' at least once. thumbup

peterguk V6 KWK

2,622 posts

248 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
fido said:
Established 1984 said:
Am I the only one that gets annoyed by people spouting the he’s 'unelected' line?
Yeah, i think Mugabe did get properly 'elected' at least once. thumbup
Easy if you're the only candidate and threaten anyone who doesn't vote for you with an early, painful death....

XitUp

7,690 posts

235 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
Established 1984 said:
Am I the only one that gets annoyed by people spouting the he’s 'unelected' line?
No.

fido

18,922 posts

286 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
peterguk V6 KWK said:
fido said:
Established 1984 said:
Am I the only one that gets annoyed by people spouting the he’s 'unelected' line?
Yeah, i think Mugabe did get properly 'elected' at least once. thumbup
Easy if you're the only candidate and threaten anyone who doesn't vote for you with an early, painful death....
He wasn't the only candidate from his first election, back in the 80s or before .. though i'm sure it wasn't a clean election from all parties involved.

carl_w

10,792 posts

289 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
Established 1984 said:
Am I the only one that gets annoyed by people spouting the he’s 'unelected' line?

FFS we don’t have an elected president in this country. We elect a party to lead the country, and they choose a leader who becomes the prime minister. Blair wasn’t elected, Thatcher wasn’t elected, Churchill wasn’t elected.
True, but the generally accepted form in this country is that if the party leader stands down and somebody else takes over, a general election is called 'fairly soon' afterwards so that the new lad has a mandate from the people.

Although the only recent example I can think of is that John Major took over in November 1990 and the next election was April 1992, so that's about 18 months.

Marf

22,907 posts

272 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
hornetrider said:
TheEnd said:
Mugabe has nicer suits
And two eyes
And isnt a mouthbreather!

FourWheelDrift

92,384 posts

315 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
carl_w said:
Although the only recent example I can think of is that John Major took over in November 1990 and the next election was April 1992, so that's about 18 months.
He didn't need to because the whole country didn't hate his guts like the current incumbent who knows he will lose.

Puggit

49,831 posts

279 months

Sunday 30th November 2008
quotequote all
carl_w said:
Established 1984 said:
Am I the only one that gets annoyed by people spouting the he’s 'unelected' line?

FFS we don’t have an elected president in this country. We elect a party to lead the country, and they choose a leader who becomes the prime minister. Blair wasn’t elected, Thatcher wasn’t elected, Churchill wasn’t elected.
True, but the generally accepted form in this country is that if the party leader stands down and somebody else takes over, a general election is called 'fairly soon' afterwards so that the new lad has a mandate from the people.

Although the only recent example I can think of is that John Major took over in November 1990 and the next election was April 1992, so that's about 18 months.
Put John Major's party did vote for him as leader.

There was no vote within zanu-Labour, Brown saw to it that no one dared cross him...