Stunning Harrier on Britmodeller
Stunning Harrier on Britmodeller
Author
Discussion

onyx39

Original Poster:

11,349 posts

174 months

Eric Mc

124,906 posts

289 months

Tuesday 22nd May 2012
quotequote all
I've seen some comment about the strange green anti-collision beacon.

Apart from that howler, it's nice.

jmorgan

36,010 posts

308 months

Tuesday 22nd May 2012
quotequote all
yikes
That is stunning.

SlipStream77

2,153 posts

215 months

Tuesday 22nd May 2012
quotequote all
It's a very impressive model, the variation in panel shades in particular.

I think I've seen some of his work before and it is always extremely well done.

I occasionally fit somewhat unusual loadouts on my models, but he's got what looks like a maverick on the starboard wing. I didn't think we used those.

Eric Mc

124,906 posts

289 months

Tuesday 22nd May 2012
quotequote all
It's a great demonstration of modelling skills - but may not be that accurate as a rendition of the real thing.

dr_gn

16,768 posts

208 months

Tuesday 22nd May 2012
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
It's a great demonstration of modelling skills - but may not be that accurate as a rendition of the real thing.
You'll be telling us Airfix make good models next...

It's a brilliant piece of modelling IMO. Nothing wrong with the green filters over the lights either as far as I can see.

Eric Mc

124,906 posts

289 months

Tuesday 22nd May 2012
quotequote all
I've never seen a green filter over a red ACB. Why would anyone do such a thing?

DubZeus

1,401 posts

242 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2012
quotequote all
Beautiful model,although my dad was wondering if it was finished. Here's what he states(having worked on Harriers for 10 years).
1, If the main undercarriage lock is fitted and the nose wheel steering pin is fitted (as seen by the remove before flight flags) then why not fit the nose undercarriage lock and the outrigger locks.
2, If the nose undercarriage doors are open, then the nose undercarriage door release handle should be extended.

If these were done then it should in theory be complete.

Zaxxon

4,057 posts

184 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2012
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
I've never seen a green filter over a red ACB. Why would anyone do such a thing?
Errr, what colour is this one? smile


dr_gn

16,768 posts

208 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2012
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
I've never seen a green filter over a red ACB. Why would anyone do such a thing?
Night Vision.

Eric Mc

124,906 posts

289 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2012
quotequote all
Is that a guess or do they really cover the red becaons with green filters of some sort?

Zaxxon

4,057 posts

184 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2012
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Is that a guess or do they really cover the red becaons with green filters of some sort?
I think my pic shows that they do. That's not a shop by the way.

Here's another http://www.airplane-pictures.net/image22046.html

Just search for Harrier GR9 and select images, there are several showing green beacons.

Edited by Zaxxon on Wednesday 23 May 09:11

Eric Mc

124,906 posts

289 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2012
quotequote all
Fair enough. I take it all back.

onyx39

Original Poster:

11,349 posts

174 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2012
quotequote all
dr_gn said:
Eric Mc said:
I've never seen a green filter over a red ACB. Why would anyone do such a thing?
Night Vision.
I posted the question over on Pprune, and you are indeed correct:

"NVG compatability. They weren't painted green but had filtering. Originally night ops was done with no anti-collision lights showing as they gave too much blooming on the goggles but later fit introduced NVG compatability. "

dr_gn

16,768 posts

208 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2012
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Is that a guess or do they really cover the red becaons with green filters of some sort?
A guess?

perdu

4,885 posts

223 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2012
quotequote all
It's a very nice model and even more nice because the line detailing has been restrained and picked out in a far more realistic dirty grey wink (Black is so outré) just like real panel lines and even better because he has resisted the temptation to blackmark every panel

The only reservation I have? The thickness of the MDC inside the canopy, it looks about twice as thick as it should be

Not bad if that's all I saw to criticise thumbup

Mind you, Zaxxon's picture looks phoney, all those lines everywhere yes

Eric Mc

124,906 posts

289 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2012
quotequote all
Was looking at some real aeroplanes at the RAF Museum on Sunday and the variation in panel lines was really interesting.

On some aircarft you can't see any.

On others they are really obvious.

On some they even overlap.

dr_gn

16,768 posts

208 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2012
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Was looking at some real aeroplanes at the RAF Museum on Sunday and the variation in panel lines was really interesting.

On some aircarft you can't see any.

On others they are really obvious.

On some they even overlap.
The overlapping ones are usually aligned with the airflow along the fuselage. They're called longitudinal splices and are the joints between the fuselage sub-assemblies.

Assuming the idea of a scale model is to represent a real aircraft magically scaled down 32 or 72 times, and nobody will ever know what that would really look like, you're left with simply asking yourself "does this model look good?".

Alternatively, you could take a photograph of a model and compare it with a similar photograph of the real thing, but is that really what it's all about?

Eric Mc

124,906 posts

289 months

Wednesday 23rd May 2012
quotequote all
At the end of the day, it is down to the modeller to decide what and how they want to portray panels, weathering etc.

But I do think it is a good idea every now and then to have a look at the real thing.