How many sick days is too many?
Author
Discussion

okgo

Original Poster:

41,913 posts

225 months

Wednesday 4th August 2010
quotequote all
A freind of mine has had maybe 6 sick days so far this year, all for legit reasons, and is being given hassle by management at their job about it.

What is the law and code of practice surrounding this?

Thanks for your help.

edc

9,571 posts

278 months

Wednesday 4th August 2010
quotequote all
There is no stipultion on how many days is too many, hence companies using tools such as Bradford Factor or implementing a policy. 6 days so far this year with all of them being Mondays would be a conduct issue and the company can push this down a disciplinary procedure. Perhaps the individual has failed to follow on all occasions the reporting procedure. Long-term absence may become a capability issue. Ultimately the requirements for managing either towarda an exit or disciplinary are practically identical.

don4l

10,058 posts

203 months

Wednesday 4th August 2010
quotequote all
okgo said:
A freind of mine has had maybe 6 sick days so far this year, all for legit reasons, and is being given hassle by management at their job about it.

What is the law and code of practice surrounding this?

Thanks for your help.
The law doesn't say too much about this. Some companies only pay Statuary Sick Pay, which only kicks in after three days of continuous illness.

Was it one episode of 6 days, or was it 6 separate occasions?

If it was 6 separate occasions, then your mate must have some serious health issues if they were all "legit".

Another thing that employers might look at is which day of the week your mate is most susceptible to illness. In other words, is he more likely to be sick on a Monday than a Wednesday.


Don
--

okgo

Original Poster:

41,913 posts

225 months

Wednesday 4th August 2010
quotequote all
Well these are the cases.

Kidney infection 2
Funeral 1
Injuries from a bike crash 1
Flu 2


Team 17

623 posts

217 months

Wednesday 4th August 2010
quotequote all
okgo said:
Well these are the cases.

Kidney infection 2
Funeral 1
Injuries from a bike crash 1
Flu 2
Must have been really sick (i.e. dead) to attend a funeral, was it his own? confused

Edited by Team 17 on Wednesday 4th August 11:50

KrazyIvan

4,341 posts

202 months

Wednesday 4th August 2010
quotequote all
okgo said:
Well these are the cases.

Kidney infection 2
Funeral 1
Injuries from a bike crash 1
Flu 2
Odd, why was the Funeral taken as Sick.

My company policy is 3 separate occasion in a 12 month period, a 4th in that period and you have to have a meeting with HR and your Manager.

As for Flu, I take it you mean a "Cold" as I had flu 5 years ago and was bed ridden for 5 days and knackered for another 5.

And as said if these are all Monday Fridays, then that might be why there not happy, However I would have thought the most they will do is a verbal warning, which doesn’t really mean anything in the long run.

okgo

Original Poster:

41,913 posts

225 months

Wednesday 4th August 2010
quotequote all
Not sure.

I mean flu, left work on friday and went to bed, and only got out of bed yesterday pretty much, and isn't looking to great today.

don4l

10,058 posts

203 months

Wednesday 4th August 2010
quotequote all
Well, he has 96 points on the Bradford scale. Many companies will want a chat at this point.

The funeral shouldn't have been taken as a sick day. Depending on the relationship with the desceased, some companies would have given a half or full day off with pay. Many would allow him to use some of his holiday entitlement.

He shouldn't be getting "hassle" as such, but I am not surprised that his bosses are a bit unhappy.

Don
--

Original Poster

5,429 posts

203 months

Wednesday 4th August 2010
quotequote all
6 is too many IMO.

I am not surprised they are not happy about it...

bonsai

2,015 posts

207 months

Wednesday 4th August 2010
quotequote all
Let us know how you(r friend) get on.

okgo

Original Poster:

41,913 posts

225 months

Wednesday 4th August 2010
quotequote all
Well it appears that its just been mentioned a couple of times, I don't think anything will come of it, but I personally think they should give it a rest, I was wrong about the funeral, it was an extra day for the kidney infection, so they're all legit reasons and said person works very hard.

phil-sti

2,971 posts

206 months

Wednesday 4th August 2010
quotequote all
1

pugwash4x4

7,670 posts

248 months

Wednesday 4th August 2010
quotequote all
okgo said:
Well it appears that its just been mentioned a couple of times, I don't think anything will come of it, but I personally think they should give it a rest, I was wrong about the funeral, it was an extra day for the kidney infection, so they're all legit reasons and said person works very hard.
according to...........?

okgo

Original Poster:

41,913 posts

225 months

Wednesday 4th August 2010
quotequote all
The manager in regards to works hard and is good at job, and me for them being legit reasons.

Silver993tt

9,064 posts

266 months

Wednesday 4th August 2010
quotequote all
1 day is too many. The employee should either have savings to cover any time off work or alternatively take out an insurance policy to cover against time off for ill-health. Otherwise the cost of the lost time is put on the products/services that the company makes/provides. At the very least, the first day out of the first 3 shouldn't be paid and then the first 2 days out of 6 etc.

okgo

Original Poster:

41,913 posts

225 months

Wednesday 4th August 2010
quotequote all
Thanks for your inputs guys.

The Lukas

2,773 posts

221 months

Wednesday 4th August 2010
quotequote all
Silver993tt said:
1 day is too many. The employee should either have savings to cover any time off work or alternatively take out an insurance policy to cover against time off for ill-health. Otherwise the cost of the lost time is put on the products/services that the company makes/provides. At the very least, the first day out of the first 3 shouldn't be paid and then the first 2 days out of 6 etc.
I will disagree to a degree. It's all down to company policy. If the company covers for your sick days, then more than likely it comes out your wages (over the whole workforce) anyway. It's all relative.

BMWBen

4,906 posts

228 months

Thursday 5th August 2010
quotequote all
Silver993tt said:
1 day is too many. The employee should either have savings to cover any time off work or alternatively take out an insurance policy to cover against time off for ill-health. Otherwise the cost of the lost time is put on the products/services that the company makes/provides. At the very least, the first day out of the first 3 shouldn't be paid and then the first 2 days out of 6 etc.
...or, the company values its employees and one of the benefits it costs for is paying wages which its employees are sick.

Without employees most companies would cease to exist, after all. It's a two way relationship.

spikeyhead

20,201 posts

224 months

Thursday 5th August 2010
quotequote all
BMWBen said:
Silver993tt said:
1 day is too many. The employee should either have savings to cover any time off work or alternatively take out an insurance policy to cover against time off for ill-health. Otherwise the cost of the lost time is put on the products/services that the company makes/provides. At the very least, the first day out of the first 3 shouldn't be paid and then the first 2 days out of 6 etc.
...or, the company values its employees and one of the benefits it costs for is paying wages which its employees are sick.

Without employees most companies would cease to exist, after all. It's a two way relationship.
^^^^this

we're no longer in the 19th century

Silver993tt

9,064 posts

266 months

Thursday 5th August 2010
quotequote all
BMWBen said:
Silver993tt said:
1 day is too many. The employee should either have savings to cover any time off work or alternatively take out an insurance policy to cover against time off for ill-health. Otherwise the cost of the lost time is put on the products/services that the company makes/provides. At the very least, the first day out of the first 3 shouldn't be paid and then the first 2 days out of 6 etc.
...or, the company values its employees and one of the benefits it costs for is paying wages which its employees are sick.

Without employees most companies would cease to exist, after all. It's a two way relationship.
most of our employees are still with us after many years and this is the kind of approach we use. Our 'sickness' rate is very small. They are paid on their performance and are paid very well which is why most are still with us smile