Can anyone quickly answer an employment related question...
Discussion
To paraphrase the situation,
M+S employee drops crate of jam tarts roughly valued at £7 trade, £20 retail. M+S offers jam tarts for employee to take home. Employee takes jam tarts home and consumes roughly a 1/4 of the crate (not in one sitting
).
Employer then issues wage slip along with a letter stating that deductions have not been made for spillages, however they would like to be paid £10 in cash/cheque for the spilt goods.
M+S employee drops crate of jam tarts roughly valued at £7 trade, £20 retail. M+S offers jam tarts for employee to take home. Employee takes jam tarts home and consumes roughly a 1/4 of the crate (not in one sitting
). Employer then issues wage slip along with a letter stating that deductions have not been made for spillages, however they would like to be paid £10 in cash/cheque for the spilt goods.
Burty88 said:
To paraphrase the situation,
M+S employee drops crate of jam tarts roughly valued at £7 trade, £20 retail. M+S offers jam tarts for employee to take home. Employee takes jam tarts home and consumes roughly a 1/4 of the crate (not in one sitting
).
Employer then issues wage slip along with a letter stating that deductions have not been made for spillages, however they would like to be paid £10 in cash/cheque for the spilt goods.
M&S offered the goods, didn't agree a figure and now retrospectively trying to agree a price and demand funds?M+S employee drops crate of jam tarts roughly valued at £7 trade, £20 retail. M+S offers jam tarts for employee to take home. Employee takes jam tarts home and consumes roughly a 1/4 of the crate (not in one sitting
). Employer then issues wage slip along with a letter stating that deductions have not been made for spillages, however they would like to be paid £10 in cash/cheque for the spilt goods.
Hmm...
Burty88 said:
To paraphrase the situation,
M+S employee drops crate of jam tarts roughly valued at £7 trade, £20 retail. M+S offers jam tarts for employee to take home. Employee takes jam tarts home and consumes roughly a 1/4 of the crate (not in one sitting
).
Employer then issues wage slip along with a letter stating that deductions have not been made for spillages, however they would like to be paid £10 in cash/cheque for the spilt goods.
No written contract = GTFO.M+S employee drops crate of jam tarts roughly valued at £7 trade, £20 retail. M+S offers jam tarts for employee to take home. Employee takes jam tarts home and consumes roughly a 1/4 of the crate (not in one sitting
). Employer then issues wage slip along with a letter stating that deductions have not been made for spillages, however they would like to be paid £10 in cash/cheque for the spilt goods.
Sorry, just to ammend, M+S (it isn't actually m+s btw) stated verbally upon the accident, that the spillage would be taken out of the employees wages, then issued a full wage slip (albeit with a few "dodgey reduced hours")
Apologies that wasn't made clear, I'm writing on behalf of someone else, and still trying to get all the details.
Apologies that wasn't made clear, I'm writing on behalf of someone else, and still trying to get all the details.
Edited by Burty88 on Monday 27th September 12:15
Edited by Burty88 on Monday 27th September 12:16
Burty88 said:
It's not M+S,
Shockingly, it's a relative of the accused small business.
I just didn't want to be too obvious.
Ahh. No contract defining their ability to remove spillages from wages?Shockingly, it's a relative of the accused small business.
I just didn't want to be too obvious.
Wouldn't most businesses:
- Write off small spillages as part of the general wastage? (backed up with a talking to / training). From experience in retail (admittedly larger company retail) some years back, it was always written off. If it became a pattern then the manager would have a look into things...
- Have insurance for big losses
- Have contracts with their staff
plg said:
Burty88 said:
It's not M+S,
Shockingly, it's a relative of the accused small business.
I just didn't want to be too obvious.
Ahh. No contract defining their ability to remove spillages from wages?Shockingly, it's a relative of the accused small business.
I just didn't want to be too obvious.
Wouldn't most businesses:
- Write off small spillages as part of the general wastage? (backed up with a talking to / training). From experience in retail (admittedly larger company retail) some years back, it was always written off. If it became a pattern then the manager would have a look into things...
- Have insurance for big losses
- Have contracts with their staff
The employee was really never made aware of any of the rules and they were only outlined - quite sternly; sourcing the law as a defence for someof them - once the employee had left the business to return to uni. This was in the e-mail along with the request to pay for the spilt goods.
Thanks all for your help so far, it's made the person feel a lot more secure in the defence of their position.
Gassing Station | Jobs & Employment Matters | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


