lesser job v no job!
Author
Discussion

Lois

Original Poster:

14,706 posts

280 months

Wednesday 19th January 2011
quotequote all
My current contract ends in a couple of weeks. At present there are no jobs. I have enjoyed my research role, but they are all temporary contracts anyway and don't particularly like the clinical job anymore. I have however had an interview for a job I used to do and really enjoyed, but it is 1/3 of my current wage and is seen as a step backwards.
We could probably just about get by on that wage.

1) have you taken a massive pay cut which you can just about get by on? Is it liberating or stressful?
2) should I happen to get offered a better job in the future, would it look better to have had no job for a short while or a "backwards step" job which I then effectively sh*t on if I left just after joining?

davepoth

29,395 posts

227 months

Wednesday 19th January 2011
quotequote all
It does depend really. If you are in the sort of role which involves lots of short term contracts, a short break between them isn't going to cause too much of an issue. But for other jobs, a big unexplained gap can cause problems.

deckster

9,631 posts

283 months

Thursday 20th January 2011
quotequote all
No job for a while won't be considered badly (at least not in my area of IT), however longer gaps, say more than a couple of months, will be asked about at interview. The more important question is how long can you go without an income? If you can get by for a while without working then personally I'd be inclined to wait but it's very much dependent on your attitude to risk, the outlook in your industry etc. etc.

fido

18,768 posts

283 months

Thursday 20th January 2011
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
TBH if they are only paying 1/3 of your current pay i wouldn't feel an ounce of guilt about leaving them -and if you liked the job and they offered better pay then maybe you would stay. Gotta look after No. 1

stackmonkey

5,084 posts

277 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
I'm currently on gardening leave pending redundancy. I've had an interview for a job that pays less than what I'm currently earning but also somewhat less than I need to live on.
Having been in the position of no job vs lesser job and previously taken "no job" I'll be taking the choice of "lesser job" this time, assuming I get it.
If nothing else, it's always easier to get a job when you're already in one than not.

Lois

Original Poster:

14,706 posts

280 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
I hope I get offered it now!
If I do get it id probably want to stick at it and try for promotion rather than be seen to be flitting from one job to the next. Since qualifying I haven't stayed more than a year anywhere.

Munter

31,331 posts

269 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
I'd go for lesser job. You can always put the reason for taking it as something like "I like to be busy, and while not at the level I feel I'd like to work at, taking this role enabled me to keep up to date with <my area of business>, while I seek a new role as <what you're applying for>" in of the description on your CV.

Just my thoughts. I'm no expert.

rog007

5,823 posts

252 months

Sunday 23rd January 2011
quotequote all
Lesser job...watching Jeremy Kyle....Lesser job....watching Jeremy Kyle scratchchin

I know what I would choose! Good luck.

Lois

Original Poster:

14,706 posts

280 months

Sunday 23rd January 2011
quotequote all
Thanks, I'm actually quite nervous about getting the phone call tomorrow!

RenOh

12 posts

187 months

Monday 24th January 2011
quotequote all
From personal experience, don't take it if you get offered it.

Lesser job means you are trapped in a job you wouln't normally do and potentially missing out what you do want to do.

If you are working in a job that you will eventually tire of, you start to resent it, dread going in in the mornings and that trickles down into the rest of your life.

Engineer1

10,486 posts

237 months

Monday 24th January 2011
quotequote all
The exact opposite is my experience, in work and the phone keeps ringing with possible jobs etc. out of work and it goes quite, your CV has a gap to fill, you start getting bored fed up and demoralised with rejection after rejection and being ignored.
The biggest thing is how is the job market in your area and your trade, taking a lesser job if there is nothing else makes sense, just taking it to be in work in a good market is less sensible.

Lois

Original Poster:

14,706 posts

280 months

Monday 24th January 2011
quotequote all
Positives - she offered me the job. They will accept my qualifications so start me on a higher wage.

Negatives - the wage is still less than half what I was on, and now its only 25 hours a week...how can I survive?!

rog007

5,823 posts

252 months

Monday 24th January 2011
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
You'll survive; just fill up with normal unleaded as opposed to super from now on! wink

Seriously, you'll adapt; were good at that us humans! You can now look for other part time work, or do some volunteering for the many organisations desperate for people to help. Good luck!

Engineer1

10,486 posts

237 months

Monday 24th January 2011
quotequote all
You can always survive on less money it just means you really assess what you need and what you think you need.

Lastinclass

511 posts

208 months

Monday 24th January 2011
quotequote all
I'm now in the same position. Started with the "lesser" job in November, it has reminded me of some of the fundamentals of the industry! Just in the last week or two my phone has started ringing with people looking to talk to me about jobs at my more "normal" position.
I do think you have to be in work to get work.

Lois

Original Poster:

14,706 posts

280 months

Monday 24th January 2011
quotequote all
rog007 said:
anonymous said:
[redacted]
You'll survive; just fill up with normal unleaded as opposed to super from now on! wink
I best not, I drive a diesel!

I think its OH who's getting me down. Hes stressing more about the wage than I am and has just referred to it as a backwards step rather than congratulating me on getting it. Personally I think this job is a giant leap forward compared to pending unemployment frown

HertsBiker

6,443 posts

299 months

Monday 31st January 2011
quotequote all
OH god this sounds so familiar to me too!!! I'm looking for work, can prob get part time work that would *just* cover the bills with nothing to spare. But atleast it is better than JSA. Makes me wonder if 2 part time jobs would be better, as atleast if one goes, you still have backup. And Hi Lois! good luck.

escargot

17,123 posts

245 months

Monday 31st January 2011
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
He'd be stressing far more if you weren't contributing anything to the household pot I suspect.

If it's only 25 hours, what are the chances of you getting other temp work/evening work temporarily to bridge the gap?

Not an ideal situation for sure, but one that would look incredibly good to potential future employers.

anonymous-user

82 months

Monday 31st January 2011
quotequote all
I'd take it and pad it out with temp/evening stuff if the money is not enough, it's only a stop-gap after all. Having ANY kind of job is better than being sat at home and it's a lot easier to brush off rejection letters when you're currently receiving a wage from somebody...

DJC

23,563 posts

264 months

Monday 31st January 2011
quotequote all
There is no such thing as a "lesser" job or a backwards step if it pays the bills.

Its rule no 1 and its so golden even Soovys arse would look good in its reflection.