Ambulance BBC
Author
Discussion

Scuba_steve

Original Poster:

579 posts

203 months

Thursday 24th August 2017
quotequote all
Just started - not set in London this time.

Looks good so far. The opening credits are a bit eek a Leon Cupra R has a heavy accident right in front of the ambulance, not sure if it's responding to an incident when it's happening or not.

Watching with interest

KTF

10,496 posts

173 months

Thursday 24th August 2017
quotequote all
The controllers have a lot of balls to juggle, all the time.

Whoever prioritises the jobs must have their own ways of coping.

craste

1,227 posts

230 months

Thursday 24th August 2017
quotequote all
This was great, well worth a watch!

KTF

10,496 posts

173 months

Thursday 31st August 2017
quotequote all
Bump for episode 2.

Still a great watch.

anonymous-user

77 months

Thursday 31st August 2017
quotequote all
Only person worth their time so far is the old boy, The alcofrolic and drink driver both need a right bking especially the DD's dad trying to remove the pishhead.
Yet again this shows there is definitely no shortage of resources just a massive misuse of them by feckers.

Halmyre

12,264 posts

162 months

Thursday 31st August 2017
quotequote all
speedyguy said:
Only person worth their time so far is the old boy, The alcofrolic and drink driver both need a right bking especially the DD's dad trying to remove the pishhead.
Yet again this shows there is definitely no shortage of resources just a massive misuse of them by feckers.
Isn't the dad conspiring to pervert the course of justice or something?

KTF

10,496 posts

173 months

Thursday 31st August 2017
quotequote all
The old guy was quite sad really but I can see why he wanted to retain his independence.

The other two did bring it on themselves but they still need to be treated. Guess it shows the gap in mental health services or similar?

williamp

20,107 posts

296 months

Thursday 31st August 2017
quotequote all
the drunk guy was wasting their resources. He said no, they should have left him there: he wouldnt have died, he had his wife, they had other things to do.

Pompeymedic

35 posts

114 months

Friday 1st September 2017
quotequote all
williamp said:
the drunk guy was wasting their resources. He said no, they should have left him there: he wouldnt have died, he had his wife, they had other things to do.
The problem with that scenario is that although he seemed relatively ok, he still needed an assessment by the hospital. The crew had assessed his capacity to make decisions (using the Mental Capacity Act) and found him lacking, so decided to act in his best interest. If they had left him at home and he'd had a further incident which had resulted in his death, the coroner is going to be asking the crew why they had left a patient at home, who was at risk and needed hospital, and who didn't have capacity. The answer "because Police wouldn't attend" just won't cut it.
I agree that patients like that can be a pain in the arse to deal with, but they're also the ones who can mess up your career because you get complacent about them, then they unexpectedly die.
Police control were talking bks when they said there was nothing they could do though.

Halmyre

12,264 posts

162 months

Friday 1st September 2017
quotequote all
Pompeymedic said:
williamp said:
the drunk guy was wasting their resources. He said no, they should have left him there: he wouldnt have died, he had his wife, they had other things to do.
The problem with that scenario is that although he seemed relatively ok, he still needed an assessment by the hospital. The crew had assessed his capacity to make decisions (using the Mental Capacity Act) and found him lacking, so decided to act in his best interest. If they had left him at home and he'd had a further incident which had resulted in his death, the coroner is going to be asking the crew why they had left a patient at home, who was at risk and needed hospital, and who didn't have capacity. The answer "because Police wouldn't attend" just won't cut it.
I agree that patients like that can be a pain in the arse to deal with, but they're also the ones who can mess up your career because you get complacent about them, then they unexpectedly die.
Police control were talking bks when they said there was nothing they could do though.
My wife said I'll bet that policeman's comment isn't going to go well for him! I knew that crew's three-hour stint was going to be a piss-boiler for a lot of people but I'm guessing that's the very far end of the bell curve.

Pompeymedic

35 posts

114 months

Friday 1st September 2017
quotequote all
Halmyre said:
My wife said I'll bet that policeman's comment isn't going to go well for him! I knew that crew's three-hour stint was going to be a piss-boiler for a lot of people but I'm guessing that's the very far end of the bell curve.
It's not common. I can count on one hand the amount of times I've had on scene times like that. It is very common, however, to spend longer than needed due to waiting for assistance from agencies who should be dealing with the situation in the first instance.

Adz The Rat

17,749 posts

232 months

Friday 1st September 2017
quotequote all
Very good show so far, I can see how it must be so frustrating fir the operators

williamp

20,107 posts

296 months

Friday 1st September 2017
quotequote all
Pompeymedic said:
williamp said:
the drunk guy was wasting their resources. He said no, they should have left him there: he wouldnt have died, he had his wife, they had other things to do.
The problem with that scenario is that although he seemed relatively ok, he still needed an assessment by the hospital. The crew had assessed his capacity to make decisions (using the Mental Capacity Act) and found him lacking, so decided to act in his best interest. If they had left him at home and he'd had a further incident which had resulted in his death, the coroner is going to be asking the crew why they had left a patient at home, who was at risk and needed hospital, and who didn't have capacity. The answer "because Police wouldn't attend" just won't cut it.
I agree that patients like that can be a pain in the arse to deal with, but they're also the ones who can mess up your career because you get complacent about them, then they unexpectedly die.
Police control were talking bks when they said there was nothing they could do though.
sorry but I didsagree. He didnt do anything wrong, he wasnt under arrest, the Police didnt need to be called. Medical staff cannot force someone into hosiptal, nor get the police to force them. It may have been in his best interetst, but it should be the his decision. And he made his decision. Police were right: there was nothing they could do.

KTF

10,496 posts

173 months

Friday 1st September 2017
quotequote all
After a while they must detach. Like the operator who was 'annoyed' when the guy wasn't doing what he was told from a CPR point of view because his wife had died and started complaining that there was no ambulance.

I mean, how would you react in that circumstance.

Pompeymedic

35 posts

114 months

Saturday 2nd September 2017
quotequote all
williamp said:
sorry but I didsagree. He didnt do anything wrong, he wasnt under arrest, the Police didnt need to be called. Medical staff cannot force someone into hosiptal, nor get the police to force them. It may have been in his best interetst, but it should be the his decision. And he made his decision. Police were right: there was nothing they could do.
Yes medical staff can. If someone isn't able to make an informed decision about medical treatment due to an impairment of their mind, then medical staff can make the decision on their behalf.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

278 months

Saturday 2nd September 2017
quotequote all
Pompeymedic said:
Yes medical staff can. If someone isn't able to make an informed decision about medical treatment due to an impairment of their mind, then medical staff can make the decision on their behalf.
Like people who think Ambiwlans is dumbing down, you mean?


Edited by mybrainhurts on Sunday 3rd September 15:35

Pompeymedic

35 posts

114 months

Saturday 2nd September 2017
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
Like people who think Ambiwlans in dumbing down, you mean?
Unfortunately there is no provisions in the Act for reduced brain function due to comically low iq.
It was designed for dementia patients, those under the influence of drugs or alcohol, mental health crisises, combative behaviour due to illness or injury, etc. Not for the terminally dense wink

paulmakin

727 posts

164 months

Sunday 3rd September 2017
quotequote all
sorry - just mistakenly repeated the info given above.

as you were !

KTF

10,496 posts

173 months

Thursday 7th September 2017
quotequote all
I wonder how the call volume would drop once you took alcohol out of the equation.

TheRainMaker

7,647 posts

265 months

Thursday 7th September 2017
quotequote all
It would seem, a lot....

Hats of to these people, I could not do that job.