Audi Q7 V12 TDi
Author
Discussion

sniff diesel

Original Poster:

13,124 posts

232 months

owain

1,630 posts

217 months

Tuesday 16th September 2008
quotequote all
0-60 in 5.5, not bad!

imagine how much that'll depreciate,

horrid interior tho

Edited by owain on Tuesday 16th September 16:51

marctwo

3,666 posts

280 months

Tuesday 16th September 2008
quotequote all
That is obscene.

I like it.

LuS1fer

43,027 posts

265 months

Tuesday 16th September 2008
quotequote all
owain said:
0-60 in 5.5, not bad!

imagine how much that'll depreciate,

horrid interior tho

EFA. "...and exterior".

i want an aero

642 posts

226 months

Tuesday 16th September 2008
quotequote all
i would buy it

IceBoy

2,452 posts

241 months

Tuesday 16th September 2008
quotequote all
Jeeezzzz....that is one bad motha !

Ment-Al

19,218 posts

215 months

Tuesday 16th September 2008
quotequote all
Thats pathetic.

It'll be 30k by this time next year!

LukeBird

17,170 posts

229 months

Tuesday 16th September 2008
quotequote all
owain said:
0-60 in 5.5, not bad!

imagine how much that'll depreciate,

horrid interior tho
£20k the moment it's off the forecourt... shirley? scratchchin

i want an aero

642 posts

226 months

Tuesday 16th September 2008
quotequote all
Ment-Al said:
It'll be 30k by this time next year!
best to buy nearly new, someone else had taken a big hit, probably a footballer with something like this

boolay

1,553 posts

258 months

Tuesday 16th September 2008
quotequote all
737lb/ft lick

Deva Link

26,934 posts

265 months

Tuesday 16th September 2008
quotequote all
boolay said:
737lb/ft lick
It'll probably cost more in tyres than it does in fuel - the "standard" ones are bad enough.

dan101smith

17,002 posts

231 months

Tuesday 16th September 2008
quotequote all
boolay said:
737lb/ft lick
nono

737 £/ft

Fire99

9,863 posts

249 months

Tuesday 16th September 2008
quotequote all
Right so its getting on towards 3 tonnes fully fuelled up, does 12mpg when you're driving it enthusiastically does 155 and 0-60 in 5.5 seconds, doesnt handle too well and costs nearly 100k....

I don't get the point... Its fast for what it is but surely if you want to go fast buy a car where the physics helps rather than works against it.

For that money surely there must be a cazillion better ways to spend 100 grand.

Zod

35,295 posts

278 months

Tuesday 16th September 2008
quotequote all
dan101smith said:
boolay said:
737lb/ft lick
nono

737 £/ft
nono £5760/ft

ETA: it looks horrific. The price is a joke. Only an idiot or a footballer (tautology surely) would buy one new.

Edited by Zod on Tuesday 16th September 17:18

Deva Link

26,934 posts

265 months

Tuesday 16th September 2008
quotequote all
Zod said:
ETA: it looks horrific. The price is a joke. Only an idiot or a footballer (tautology surely) would buy one new.
I wonder if they'll give them free to players in the teams they sponsor? There was a bit of a kerfuffle a few years ago when Beckham was at Real Madrid and he ticked every possible option box on the Q7 he ordered. Alledgedly Audi weren't amused that it was over £70K.

chris_w666

22,655 posts

219 months

Tuesday 16th September 2008
quotequote all
Utterly and truly pointless, but I suppose you sometimes need a 4x4 so park it next to the RS6 when you deliver mine please.

flattotheboards

6,688 posts

226 months

Tuesday 16th September 2008
quotequote all
If you can afford to spend £96k on a car you can afford to have a petrol.

sniff diesel

Original Poster:

13,124 posts

232 months

Tuesday 16th September 2008
quotequote all
flattotheboards said:
If you can afford to spend £96k on a car you can afford to have a petrol.
I didn't know they did a petrol Q7 that was as quick?

Frik

13,649 posts

263 months

Tuesday 16th September 2008
quotequote all
Saw it at Goodwood. The disks are HUGE!

zagato

1,136 posts

221 months

Tuesday 16th September 2008
quotequote all
Check out the recent trade in prices thread on here. I recall the circa 90k audi A8 example being traded for roughly 37ish after one year. This will loose even more!