2 jags, 4 speeding tickets, 8 chins..
2 jags, 4 speeding tickets, 8 chins..
Author
Discussion

CarZee

Original Poster:

13,382 posts

294 months

Thursday 9th January 2003
quotequote all
Sort fo a crosspost, but I thought it merited seperate discussion as I didn't know this until now..

From today's Times, at the bottom of the article about HH's speeding offence:

John Prescott, the Deputy Prime Minister, has four speeding convictions, the last in 1997 when he drove at 80mph on a 30mph section of the icy M62 motorway. He said that he was going to a constituency surgery and did not want to keep people waiting in the cold.
Errrm.. 80 in a 30? surely not..

Bonce

4,339 posts

306 months

Thursday 9th January 2003
quotequote all
Wot no ban?

anarchystorm

943 posts

283 months

Thursday 9th January 2003
quotequote all
Where is the justice in this world. They could jali him for 18 months for dangerous driving at high speeds. If that was anyone under the age of 35, banned, jailed and probably fined. I hate these ministers etc.

Podie

46,649 posts

302 months

Thursday 9th January 2003
quotequote all
What was the policy for 80 in a 30 five years ago?

Imelda

793 posts

293 months

Thursday 9th January 2003
quotequote all

when he drove at 80mph on a 30mph section of the icy M62 motorway.


Errrrr....... Is'nt there a minimum speed limit of 30mph on motorways?

So you can't go below that speed, but you can't exceed it either.

CarZee

Original Poster:

13,382 posts

294 months

Thursday 9th January 2003
quotequote all
have to say I don't think there is a 30 section on the M62 near Hull.. probably an advisory limit which means he was stopped not becuase he was speeding but because he was driving dangerously for the conditions.

You're nicked Prescott you jabba assed

Imelda - ISTR from my Norvern road warrior days that there's nasty highlevel bridge over some river (near Goole) between Leeds & Hull on the M62.. in high winds and with icy conditions, it's perfectly reasonable to put up 30 on the matrices there..

there's no set minimum speed on the motorway, for fairly obvious reasons, but if you'recausing an obstruction by considerably lagging behind the flow of traffic, you can be done for DWDCAT or similar I think..

bear with me - I'm gonna look this up on Lexis Nexis, see if I can find the original press that this occurence got...

>> Edited by CarZee (moderator) on Thursday 9th January 14:00

Imelda

793 posts

293 months

Thursday 9th January 2003
quotequote all

CarZee said:
there's no set minimum speed on the motorway, for fairly obvious reasons, but if you'recausing an obstruction by considerably lagging behind the flow of traffic, you can be done for DWDCAT or similar I think..



I bow to your greater knowledge CarZee. I must have imagined it or confused myself or something.

Podie

46,649 posts

302 months

Thursday 9th January 2003
quotequote all

Imelda said:

CarZee said:
there's no set minimum speed on the motorway, for fairly obvious reasons, but if you'recausing an obstruction by considerably lagging behind the flow of traffic, you can be done for DWDCAT or similar I think..



I bow to your greater knowledge CarZee. I must have imagined it or confused myself or something.




Interesting... I always remember being told the minimum speed was 50mph, unless roadworks / safety dictated otherwise...

plotloss

67,280 posts

297 months

Thursday 9th January 2003
quotequote all
Fat, Northern, Fat, Ignorant, Fat, Bus Lane Commissioning, Fat, Tosser.

Matt.

Podie

46,649 posts

302 months

Thursday 9th January 2003
quotequote all

plotloss said: Fat, Northern, Fat, Ignorant, Fat, Bus Lane Commissioning, Fat, Tosser.

Matt.


I'm getting the impression that you believe that our amateur pugilist eats a few too many pies...


edited cos of me spellin

>> Edited by Podie on Thursday 9th January 14:32

madcop

6,649 posts

290 months

Thursday 9th January 2003
quotequote all
There is no minimum speed per-se on a motorway but there are restrictions on certain vehicles that are not equipped to travel at above certain speeds.

Podie

46,649 posts

302 months

Thursday 9th January 2003
quotequote all
<--- off to lamp his old driving instructor...

anarchystorm

943 posts

283 months

Thursday 9th January 2003
quotequote all
I believe that the minimal speed limit for a motorway in the UK is 50mph too. It is definatley mandatory and a speed has to be maintained above this otherwise it is deemed as dangerous driving.

Imelda

793 posts

293 months

Thursday 9th January 2003
quotequote all

anarchystorm said: I believe that the minimal speed limit for a motorway in the UK is 50mph too. It is definatley mandatory and a speed has to be maintained above this otherwise it is deemed as dangerous driving.



Can't be 50mph, bearing in mind artics are limited to 56mph top whack. The slightest incline has them dropping below this. Anyhoooo, has spoken, and he should know.

pies

13,116 posts

283 months

Thursday 9th January 2003
quotequote all

anarchystorm said: I believe that the minimal speed limit for a motorway in the UK is 50mph too. It is definatley mandatory and a speed has to be maintained above this otherwise it is deemed as dangerous driving.


Highway code says minimum speed on a motorway is 30mph

madcop

6,649 posts

290 months

Thursday 9th January 2003
quotequote all

anarchystorm said: I believe that the minimal speed limit for a motorway in the UK is 50mph too. It is definatley mandatory and a speed has to be maintained above this otherwise it is deemed as dangerous driving.


Well you have been seriously misinformed. How can you achieve a minimum speed if everything, due to congestion is travelling well below that speed?

Everyone would then be committing an offence, therefore there is no minimum limit.

s2ooz

3,005 posts

311 months

Thursday 9th January 2003
quotequote all

anarchystorm said: I believe that the minimal speed limit for a motorway in the UK is 50mph too. It is definatley mandatory and a speed has to be maintained above this otherwise it is deemed as dangerous driving.


it isnt, but Im sure madcop et al can answer - would it be possible to nick people for dangerous driving below a level?

I ask as - wait for it - I and others JUST avoided fatal multi car pile up, when we came up behind a woman doing 45mph in THE MIDDLE LANE!!! with a truck on her leftlane+behind, furiously flashing her to pull back in.

I was going to call the police and warn them, but I regret I didnt, I thought they wouldnt be interested -madcop - would you/the police overall be interested in getting a call for this?

Podie

46,649 posts

302 months

Thursday 9th January 2003
quotequote all

madcop said:

anarchystorm said: I believe that the minimal speed limit for a motorway in the UK is 50mph too. It is definatley mandatory and a speed has to be maintained above this otherwise it is deemed as dangerous driving.


Well you have been seriously misinformed. How can you achieve a minimum speed if everything, due to congestion is travelling well below that speed?

Everyone would then be committing an offence, therefore there is no minimum limit.




OK, that makes sense... but in the assumption that most people drive at 70mph (ahem) is there anything in place to allow plod to pull over people / numpties who are sat at 30mph - if conditions permit people to travel more quickly... my concern being the closing speed.

plotloss

67,280 posts

297 months

Thursday 9th January 2003
quotequote all

madcop said: There is no minimum speed per-se on a motorway but there are restrictions on certain vehicles that are not equipped to travel at above certain speeds.


Have they scrapped the old 40mph minimum then Madcop?

Alternatively I could have dreamt the whole thing!

Matt.

CarZee

Original Poster:

13,382 posts

294 months

Thursday 9th January 2003
quotequote all

madcop said: Everyone would then be committing an offence, therefore there is no minimum limit.
So look out for an 80mph minimum being introduced in the next session of parliament ... while they're dropping the maximum to 100km/h