Bush Proposes SUV Tax Breaks
Bush Proposes SUV Tax Breaks
Author
Discussion

rpguk

Original Poster:

4,514 posts

311 months

Podie

46,649 posts

302 months

Wednesday 22nd January 2003
quotequote all
I read an article (FT?) the other day, stating that they'd finally admitted that SUV's were more dangerous than cars, due to the high centre of gravity...

Hmm... now given that Ford and GM are the largest producers of SUV's and both American...

plotloss

67,280 posts

297 months

Wednesday 22nd January 2003
quotequote all
Bush gives tax break to majority of Americans in other words.

The danger aspect of SUV's though is not just the high centre of gravity but when you hit a Honda Accord in a 19ft long, 3.5 tonne Ford Excursion you do make a bit of a dent...

Matt.

Podie

46,649 posts

302 months

Wednesday 22nd January 2003
quotequote all

plotloss said: Bush gives tax break to majority of Americans in other words.

The danger aspect of SUV's though is not just the high centre of gravity but when you hit a Honda Accord in a 19ft long, 3.5 tonne Ford Excursion you do make a bit of a dent...

Matt.


Nah... Ford "tough trucks" are strong, rugged and reliable... oh, sorry... you mean the Honda...

CarZee

13,382 posts

294 months

Wednesday 22nd January 2003
quotequote all

Podie said: Nah... Ford "tough trucks" are strong, rugged and reliable... oh, sorry... you mean the Honda...
Fcuk off podie..

(M@H evidently had a point.. )

joust

14,622 posts

286 months

Wednesday 22nd January 2003
quotequote all
Old news - it's been the same in the UK for donkey's ages - if the car can be classed as a "commercial" then you pay a flat (£250 I think) tax charge for it.

Friend has a 9mpg f**k off pickup as his "company car" - didn't pay VAT on the purchase, pays flat rate tax for it.

J

Podie

46,649 posts

302 months

Wednesday 22nd January 2003
quotequote all

CarZee said:

Podie said: Nah... Ford "tough trucks" are strong, rugged and reliable... oh, sorry... you mean the Honda...
Fcuk off podie..

(M@H evidently had a point.. )


sorry... promotional cr*p overload or something.

Is it going home time yet? No? Sod it, I'm going out in the S

ErnestM

11,621 posts

294 months

Wednesday 22nd January 2003
quotequote all
Okay people - let me just put this into perspective.

You have just been the victim of media spin. I will explain.

The tax break in question is a change in the section 179 code for the depreciation of capital business assets. In other words, under the code, currently, businesses can deduct up to $ 25,000 for (very important) any capital investment into equipment immediately, instead of taking that deduction over a period of time.

What Bush's plan does is it raises that limit.

The spin part is this - the media are assuming that every business in the US will immediately run out and buy an SUV. Utter nonsense!

Personally, I plan to use the $ 75,000 (if passed) to (1)upgrade our computers at work and (2)invest in a higher tech telephone system, etc. and I would say that my plans are more in line with what main stream business will do with the "break"

Watch out for the spin merchants - they will get you every time

ErnestM

Edited to Add: By the way - what they (media spin doctors) have not reported is that for the first time in about a decade - under Bush NOT Clinton - the emissions standards have been raised (CAFE) for SUV and light duty trucks.

>> Edited by ErnestM on Wednesday 22 January 15:08