RE: Maserati GranSport Spyder | Spotted
RE: Maserati GranSport Spyder | Spotted
Tuesday 19th August

Maserati GranSport Spyder | Spotted

Summer isn't over just yet - what better way to appreciate the last few weeks of proper sunshine?


Maserati isn’t having the best time of it at the moment. True, it’s been drip feeding us regurgitated MC20 (sorry, MCPURA) special editions over the years, and we’re quite fond of the new GranTurismo in both V6 Trofeo and Folgore electric guise. But the problem is that they’re not selling nearly as well as Maserati would like, and the discontinuation of the Ghibli, Levante and Quattroporte hasn’t helped matters either - even if they were on their last legs. 

It’s not all doom and gloom, though. Maserati is said to have an electric SUV in the works, and we all know how much people like them. So that’s certainly a glimmer of hope, and it’s not like the company needs a stacked lineup to rake in sales. Turn the clock back 20 years and it was knocking on the door of five-figure sales with just two key models: the exquisite fifth-generation Quattroporte, which catapulted Maserati into the 21st century, alongside the often overlooked GranSport. Actually, you can count the GranSport Spyder - like this lovely example we have here - as a third contender because a) manufacturers love counting convertibles as ‘all-new models’ and b) the Spyder was a fair bit different to the coupe.

From afar, the two look close to identical. Aside from the Spyder’s folding soft top, of course. But park them nose to nose and view them side-on, and you’d notice something’s amiss. Look around the rear axle and you’ll notice the arches sit a lot closer to the door on the convertible than they do on the coupe. That's because Maserati chopped 220mm off the Spyder’s wheelbase to compensate for the drop in torsional rigidity. It’s still 52kg heavier than the coupe thanks to additional bracing, but that number would have been a whole lot bigger had the wheelbase not been shortened. 

The Spyder can trace its roots back to the 4200, which itself was a marked improvement over the 3200. Further enhancements came with the GranSport, which is widely considered the best sorted of the lot (save for perhaps the uber rare MC Victory). The model appeared in coupe format initially, with the drop-top introduced as a limited-run 90th Anniversary special, of which just 15 were made available in right-hand drive. Aside from the Blu Anniversary colour scheme, snazzy carbon fibre seat fairings and chrome highlights, it was otherwise a standard convertible GranSport with an inflated price tag.

Demand must have been high because Maserati would unveil the GranSport Spyder a year after the 90th Anniversary’s reveal. Like the coupe, it came with an uprated 4.2-litre naturally aspirated V8 that was now capable of delivering 400hp at 7,000rpm, and while it was paired exclusively with the flappy-paddle Cambiocorsa gearbox, the software was reworked to quicken shift times by 35 per cent and blip the throttle on downshifts for extra drama. Adaptive dampers came as standard, too. So it was essentially the 90th Anniversary model, minus the special colour, head fairings and inflated price tag. No wonder Maserati shifted a few hundred examples despite the Spyder arriving mere moments before it made way for the GranTurismo.

Being a 2007 model means this particular car will likely have been one of the last to roll off the line. And it did so in superb fashion, looking magnificent in Rosso Mondial over a black with red-piping leather interior. There’s something of the Ferrari 550 Barchetta about it, albeit four cylinders down and with a less fiddly roof. It’s a good deal cheaper than a Barchetta, too, with the seller asking £31,995 for this car. Granted, it’s a fair whack more than a coupe, but the Spyder is far rarer and gets you closer to that wonderful exhaust note. Grab it before the sun goes back into hibernation for another year. 


SPECIFICATION | MASERATI GRANSPORT SPYDER

Engine: 4,244cc V8
Transmission: six-speed automated manual, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 400@7,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 332@4,500rpm
MPG: N/A
CO2: N/A
Year registered: 2007
Recorded mileage: 64,000
Price new: N/A
Yours for: £31,995

See the original advert

Author
Discussion

m62tu

Original Poster:

94 posts

56 months

Wednesday 20th August
quotequote all
Got the looks, proper engine note, minimalist interior. Ace package.
Maybe a contender for a 3 pedal swap?

jayemm89

4,358 posts

147 months

Wednesday 20th August
quotequote all
The 4200 has possibly the worst scuttle shake of any modern car I have ever driven. Absolutely unbelievable that it actually got signed off.

Rumours are the Gransport is better but I am doubtful...

CH80

220 posts

14 months

Wednesday 20th August
quotequote all
I like these.

They did also come with 3 pedals but those were rare and came as the model pre grandsport. Took one for a test drive. It was pretty good, but I chose a Lancia Delta Integrale EVO 2 as I was looking for something more sporty. Otherwise a good looking and great sounding Maser.

A manual conversion of the transport spider is a good idea.

ducnick

2,078 posts

260 months

Wednesday 20th August
quotequote all
These look great in blues and greens… not so great in red. The biggest problem is the jag xkr which has less scuttle shake, looks similar/better, has more power, cheaper to run and all for less money.
Had the Maserati been offered exclusively with a manual transaxle gearbox then it would have a killer USP, but it was not.

dunnoreally

1,324 posts

125 months

Wednesday 20th August
quotequote all
m62tu said:
Got the looks, proper engine note, minimalist interior. Ace package.
Maybe a contender for a 3 pedal swap?
Surely way easier to spend 15 grand less on a non-GS manual and spend some of the difference on getting the handling up to snuff?

EDIT: or not! All the "manuals" on AT are actually cambicorsas once you look at the photos. I could have sworn there were generally 5 or 6 proper manuals for sale at any given time not that long ago...

Edited by dunnoreally on Wednesday 20th August 07:24

CountyLines

3,555 posts

20 months

Wednesday 20th August
quotequote all
These always looked wrong to me. Wheelbase is too short. Coupé is lovely though.

Turbobanana

7,392 posts

218 months

Wednesday 20th August
quotequote all
Don't understand the scuttle shake comments. If you lop the roof off a car you will induce scuttle shake- that is a fact. Manufacturers go to varying lengths to prevent it, but it will still be there to some extent. If it bothers you, buy a car with a roof.

This from a former long-term SAAB 900 Convertible owner, so I know what scuttle shake is.

This one looks great, but I'd want a manual personally.

ric p

656 posts

286 months

Wednesday 20th August
quotequote all
Had an ‘04 one of these for 3 years. From this year onwards they improved the rigidity so less shake, got a glass rear screen and a few other improvements.

The gearbox is no where as bad as people make out if the engagement point is set up correctly and the software can be modded to the later cars. Did a couple of Angouleme trips in mine, a great gt. Only needed a single coil pack, which I did myself, above annual servicing, which was sub £1000.



Shorter than the coupe and surprisingly compact when compared with my current XKR and the DB9 etc. Shame they are not more well thought of as if it has a jumping pony on the front, it would be 3 times the price

fflump

2,506 posts

55 months

Wednesday 20th August
quotequote all
dunnoreally said:
m62tu said:
Got the looks, proper engine note, minimalist interior. Ace package.
Maybe a contender for a 3 pedal swap?
Surely way easier to spend 15 grand less on a non-GS manual and spend some of the difference on getting the handling up to snuff?

EDIT: or not! All the "manuals" on AT are actually cambicorsas once you look at the photos. I could have sworn there were generally 5 or 6 proper manuals for sale at any given time not that long ago...

Edited by dunnoreally on Wednesday 20th August 07:24
You may well be right but I’ve only ever seen the manual box on the 4200 coupe, which having owned the CC version is definitely on my list of cars I would buy if I had the space.
The Spyder had the makings of a classic but truncating the 2+2 design ruined the look. A cheaper option than improving rigidity I guess.
The price on this one is punchy. I’m not sure it represents value for money when it’s near identical predecessor costs under half the amount.

jayemm89

4,358 posts

147 months

Wednesday 20th August
quotequote all
Turbobanana said:
Don't understand the scuttle shake comments. If you lop the roof off a car you will induce scuttle shake- that is a fact. Manufacturers go to varying lengths to prevent it, but it will still be there to some extent. If it bothers you, buy a car with a roof.

This from a former long-term SAAB 900 Convertible owner, so I know what scuttle shake is.

This one looks great, but I'd want a manual personally.
There's a difference between "some scuttle shake" and "this thing feels like it's coming apart at the seams".

The Maserati Spyder also commanded a bit more money than the SAAB when new too.

For some context, an S2000 or a Porsche Boxster are night and day better. The Maserati feels 20 years older.

CH80

220 posts

14 months

Wednesday 20th August
quotequote all
dunnoreally said:
m62tu said:
Got the looks, proper engine note, minimalist interior. Ace package.
Maybe a contender for a 3 pedal swap?
Surely way easier to spend 15 grand less on a non-GS manual and spend some of the difference on getting the handling up to snuff?

EDIT: or not! All the "manuals" on AT are actually cambicorsas once you look at the photos. I could have sworn there were generally 5 or 6 proper manuals for sale at any given time not that long ago...

Edited by dunnoreally on Wednesday 20th August 07:24
The non GS cars did come with manuals, but these were rare. I test drove one with the factory manual.

Re scuttle shake, I did notice this too, and felt the car was very "floaty", but given it was an open top, I thought it was not a big deal for the type of car it was.

I'd still choose this over the contemporary XK, for the sound that 4.2 Ferrari derived V8 makes. It also looks better: more compact, with less overhangs (never liked the bulbous rear of the XK) muscular and better attention to detail in the design element. They certainly look A LOT better in the metal than in photos.

pSyCoSiS

3,933 posts

222 months

Wednesday 20th August
quotequote all
Great looking car, fantastic engine and glorious exhaust note.

I had a 4200 Cambio Coupe a couple of years back, and it was a blast to drive.

The gearbox takes some getting used to, but once you 'click' with it, they are a good unit and fun to drive.

You can pick up Coupes for sub-£10k these days, which represent good value for money, for a car with good looks and a Ferrari-derived engine.

Turbobanana

7,392 posts

218 months

Wednesday 20th August
quotequote all
jayemm89 said:
There's a difference between "some scuttle shake" and "this thing feels like it's coming apart at the seams".

The Maserati Spyder also commanded a bit more money than the SAAB when new too.

For some context, an S2000 or a Porsche Boxster are night and day better. The Maserati feels 20 years older.
Have driven both, and I agree. But they were designed from the start to be convertibles. And sportscars, not GTs.

In my18 years in the motor trade, scuttle shake was only comment-worthy for customers coming from a car with a roof to a convertible for the first time. I've never considered it to be something that ruins the driving experience. It's just "a thing". And it's outweighed by the experience of driving with the roof off - if that's your thing.

nismo48

5,525 posts

224 months

Wednesday 20th August
quotequote all
Great looking car and the best of both worlds with roof up or down.

mrclav

1,628 posts

240 months

Wednesday 20th August
quotequote all
Much prefer the GranCabrio that replaced it.

Geoffcapes

983 posts

181 months

Wednesday 20th August
quotequote all
Let's get this straight.

The Gransport (spider or coupe) were all Cambiocorsa (CC) (flappy paddles) there were no manuals.
The 4200 (spider and coupe) had both CC and manual options.
The 3200 were auto or manual. No Spiders though.

Hope that clears things up.

Ankerhill

35 posts

82 months

Wednesday 20th August
quotequote all
Think the spyder look good with slightly shorter wheelbase.
Different league compared to a 4200.
All the chat about gearboxes - enjoy them for what they are same as an old 360 / 430 etc

Edited by Ankerhill on Wednesday 20th August 11:32


Edited by Ankerhill on Wednesday 20th August 12:40

Ankerhill

35 posts

82 months

Wednesday 20th August
quotequote all
Geoffcapes said:
Let's get this straight.

The Gransport (spider or coupe) were all Cambiocorsa (CC) (flappy paddles) there were no manuals.
The 4200 (spider and coupe) had both CC and manual options.
The 3200 were auto or manual. No Spiders though.

Hope that clears things up.
Thanks big fella!

DeejRC

7,935 posts

99 months

Wednesday 20th August
quotequote all
Ankerhill said:
Geoffcapes said:
Let's get this straight.

The Gransport (spider or coupe) were all Cambiocorsa (CC) (flappy paddles) there were no manuals.
The 4200 (spider and coupe) had both CC and manual options.
The 3200 were auto or manual. No Spiders though.

Hope that clears things up.
Thanks big fella!
Apropos of nothing, but this made me smile smile

AlandSoph

40 posts

4 months

Wednesday 20th August
quotequote all
My finger was hovering over the 5 star verdict, (convertible, lovely sculpted interior, fabulous V8 stuffed into a fairly small car, Italian soundtrack, 'only' 31 grand for a proper Italian Stallion) but then i saw that little 'T' bar selector and went down to three before settling on four because you'd still get everything on a warm sunny evening trip to a country pub (if it didn't break down...)