RE: Lamborghini Espada | Spotted
RE: Lamborghini Espada | Spotted
Tuesday 7th October

Lamborghini Espada | Spotted

Not just any Espada, either, if such a thing exists - a right-hand drive, Series 3, manual Espada...


While Lamborghini is typically associated with the wedgiest and most exotic of mid-engined supercars - because it’s made so many icons - it also has a rich history in front-engined dream machines as well. Which has culminated in the Urus, ultimately, but let’s gloss over that for the moment. Because front-engined Lambos are cool (apart from that one), and of course represent the origins of the brand: the first Lamborghini was the 350GT, a V12 stunner to rival Ferrari’s 250. That became the 400GT, which was replaced by the Islero, which was then followed up by the Jarama, more than a decade of deeply cool Lambos with the engine ahead of the driver. Only once the world had seen the Miura, was the writing on the wall. 

There was more than just those early cars in the front-engined hall of fame - who could forget the LM002? Now there’s a Lamborghini SUV. Plus, of course, the car you see here: the fascinating Espada. People talk of how a Miura must have looked in the real world almost 60 years ago, but it seems fair to say that the Espada, long and low and with those incredible glass expanses, must have attracted a fair few gawps as well. It’s really like little else before or since in the way it looks, while the concept of the Espada - two doors but four proper seats, distinctive looks, glorious V12 - isn’t dissimilar to the Ferrari FF of decades later, if without the driven front axle. 

There were never very many Espadas; it hails from a time when fewer supercars were made, and the Miura must have gobbled up a lot of production resources. (Indeed, on PH right now, there are more Miuras for sale than Espadas, even with asking prices around ten times as much.) For a decade between 1968 and 1978, it’s reckoned around 1,200 Espadas were made; it would be intriguing to know how many of those remain, given the enormous effort that must go into upkeep and where values once sat. 

This one is notable for a few reasons. It’s a Series 3 Espada, the final iteration, which benefited from better brakes, standard power steering, and a revised dash layout; it also features the five-speed manual, rather than using the TorqueFlite auto. And it’s a right-hand drive Espada, which makes it incredibly rare: there are only believed to be about 120 RHD S3s. While it’s not clear whether this is an original UK car, having a steering wheel on the side that benefits us is hugely useful. Imagine having to pilot something like this from the left-hand side over here. 

This one has been with the current owner for ten years, in which time they’ve had the Espada bare metal resprayed. Fittingly, it looks absolutely sensational. The ad suggests that steering, suspension, and brakes have been refreshed ‘over time’; probably, it’s worth banking on sorting a few bits to get it tip-top. This is a V12 Lamborghini GT from 1973, after all. 

But what a prospect owning and using an Espada remains. The Ferrari alternatives of the era just aren’t as interesting, and because of soaring values attached to more famous models of the time, it’s one of the less expensive ways into the classic V12 Lambo life. Autos are still around at less than £100,000; expect to pay more than that for this one. And a whole lot more to keep it in fine fettle. But classic GTs are rarely so good for staring at...


SPECIFICATION | LAMBORGHINI ESPADA

Engine: 3,939cc, V12
Transmission: 5-speed manual, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 355@7,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 291 @ 5,500 rpm
MPG: Pass
CO2: See above
First registered: 1973
Recorded mileage: 50,000
Price new: Many millions of lira
Price now: £POA

See the full ad

Author
Discussion

Motormouth88

Original Poster:

681 posts

80 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
Damn that’s ugly, and sensationally cool all at the same time.

GTEYE

2,330 posts

230 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
For the no doubt substantial price, the seller could have paid a bit more attention to cleaning the drivers footwell area, at least a vacuum!

rodericb

8,360 posts

146 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
Yeah it could do with some work on the interior to make it match the nice paintwork and the POA on the price.

RedWhiteMonkey

8,207 posts

202 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
About 20 years ago I did a site visit to a modest bungalow and the owner had two of these in immaculate condition in his garage. I remember he said they were pretty cheap to buy because at the time no one wanted them. I hope he still has them, he must be sitting on a fortune.

Picanto_superleggera

158 posts

31 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
I note that the silver one for sale at 88k is also manual and rhd. It's in Hong Kong but how much would it cost to import?

PRO5T

6,629 posts

45 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
I simply can't think of an uglier "exotic", did any period of car design get worse from the early/mid sixties to the late sixties to early seventies?

Within a few years you went from the Ferrari 250s to this!

Iamnotkloot

1,792 posts

167 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
PRO5T said:
I simply can't think of an uglier "exotic", did any period of car design get worse from the early/mid sixties to the late sixties to early seventies?

Within a few years you went from the Ferrari 250s to this!
Whilst I agree, however, it’s a really interesting ugly. I’m very glad they exist and are being driven around Britain.

parabolica

6,936 posts

204 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
PRO5T said:
I simply can't think of an uglier "exotic", did any period of car design get worse from the early/mid sixties to the late sixties to early seventies?

Within a few years you went from the Ferrari 250s to this!
I thought this initially as well but the more I see Harry Metcalfe's Espada in his videos the more I like it, in a big-engined, brutalist kind of way.

S600BSB

7,052 posts

126 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
Very, very cool.

WillieEckerslike

66 posts

36 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
Yes please. There was a Lamborghini service agent in the village I grew up in, I was around 10 when one of these came down the high street, they really are big and very low and sound marvellous

Harry posted a video recently of his

https://youtu.be/8x8umSO2OK8?si=sMoaFQ6zrXc40B6X

MountainsofSussex

366 posts

206 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
WillieEckerslike said:
Yes please. There was a Lamborghini service agent in the village I grew up in, I was around 10 when one of these came down the high street, they really are big and very low and sound marvellous

Harry posted a video recently of his

https://youtu.be/8x8umSO2OK8?si=sMoaFQ6zrXc40B6X
They may have been big at the time, but they're only about the same width and length as a modern 4 series. Just 30cm lower!

Pistom

6,138 posts

179 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
Not sure how anyone can call these ugly.

Sensational, stunning but ugly?

It's nice watching Harry Metcalf throw money at his to keep it in the condition it should be.

These were so unloved at one time it's amazing any survived but I guess there were enough owners who felt the same way as I did.

I remember seeing one with fire damage in a salvage yard which I was told was subject to an attempted fraudulent insurance claim.

Edited by Pistom on Tuesday 7th October 15:09

mooseracer

2,522 posts

190 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
Pistom said:
N?tt sure how anyone can call these ugly.

Sensational, stunning but ugly?

It's nice watching Harry Metcalf throw money at his to keep it in the condition it should be.

These were so unloved at one time it's amazing any survived but I guess there were enough owners who felt the same way as I did.

I remember seeing one with fire damage in a salvage yard which I was told was subject to an attempted fraudulent insurance claim.
In the eye of the beholder but yup - ugly.

sidesauce

2,967 posts

238 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
mooseracer said:
Pistom said:
N?tt sure how anyone can call these ugly.

Sensational, stunning but ugly?

It's nice watching Harry Metcalf throw money at his to keep it in the condition it should be.

These were so unloved at one time it's amazing any survived but I guess there were enough owners who felt the same way as I did.

I remember seeing one with fire damage in a salvage yard which I was told was subject to an attempted fraudulent insurance claim.
In the eye of the beholder but yup - ugly.
Fully agreed - it's an ill-proportioned hideous mess of a design.

ttthilvester

180 posts

170 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
Not a looker is it?
Was going to add that it hasn't been improved by someone sticking Halfords-spec rubbing strips along its flanks, but on checking Google images it seems most of them came like that!
You really CAN'T polish a turd.

RabidGranny

2,336 posts

158 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
GTEYE said:
For the no doubt substantial price, the seller could have paid a bit more attention to cleaning the drivers footwell area, at least a vacuum!
agreed. sloppy

DaveyBoyWonder

3,385 posts

194 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
Sort of cool, gopping, tatty looking and wallet emptying all in one.

As others have mentioned, nice of them to clean and prep the interior on a 100k+ classic. At least get the hoover out, do something about the mats and fix the leather on the seat...

J4CKO

45,365 posts

220 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
Cars dont have to be achingly beautiful to have validity, its distinctive, original and you arent mistaking it for anything else.

Its the rear that I would agree is a little challenging but overall I love it, its maybe an acquired taste but I do like these, like the Aston Martin Lagonda which is brutally ugly but somehow, for me transcends that, its just magnificent, separate and again distinctive.

People wibble on about E-Types, yeah lovely but they are a bit long and thing and the wheels tucked under like a Commer van, very few cars are perfect, Harry Metcalfe was reviewing a Ferrari 250GT and it was the one with the sort of notchback and its no way as pretty as the normal one.


Mark-C

7,038 posts

225 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
Haven't seen one on the road in years but always thought they were ungainly but fascinating.

They looked like space ships alongside mundane contemporary cars.

leglessAlex

6,498 posts

161 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
mooseracer said:
Pistom said:
N?tt sure how anyone can call these ugly.

Sensational, stunning but ugly?

It's nice watching Harry Metcalf throw money at his to keep it in the condition it should be.

These were so unloved at one time it's amazing any survived but I guess there were enough owners who felt the same way as I did.

I remember seeing one with fire damage in a salvage yard which I was told was subject to an attempted fraudulent insurance claim.
In the eye of the beholder but yup - ugly.
Yeah, I also think they look horrendous.

But they're also from a different time, and I do like everything else about them, the engine and the ethos of the car. Mr Metcalfe has also made owning one seem very appealing.