RE: Fastest-ever Skoda Fabia launched
RE: Fastest-ever Skoda Fabia launched
Tuesday 7th October

Fastest-ever Skoda Fabia launched

Probably best not to get too excited - though new 177hp flagship suggests petrol hot hatch not quite dead yet


If you build it, they will come. Not always necessarily true for cars, of course, but having just lamented the abject lack of anything approaching a hot hatch in the sub £30k category (and suggesting that Dacia might be well-placed to solve the problem), it is heartening at least to know that Skoda has evidently spent the last few months considering the same gap in the market. 

Its solution is the Fabia 130, a celebratory (because 130 years of Skoda) new range-topper breathlessly described as the ‘fastest production’ derivative to date. This is not particularly saying much on the basis that the last time the manufacturer applied a vRS badge to its supermini, it signified the presence of a diesel engine - but on the basis that so few manufacturers are prepared to make performance a marketing virtue of whatever petrol-powered superminis they have left, we’re not going to gripe. Or not too much. 

At any rate, the newcomer is powered by an uprated version of the omnipresent 1.5-litre TSI EVO2 motor, which develops 177hp where once there was only 150hp. If that doesn’t sound like enough to make tears stream horizontally across your cheeks, it isn’t: Skoda quotes a 0-62mph time of 7.4 seconds and a top speed of 142mph, neither of which could be mistaken for warp speed in this day and age. Or indeed, recent memory. 

Nevertheless, it claims to have invested in genuine hardware changes to make the bigger output viable - think optimised intake plenum, vibration damper and rocker arms - and reckons that ‘sharper, stronger performance’ results across the rev range. You get the same 184lb ft of torque from 1,500rpm, mind, although the seven-speed DSG has been reprogrammed with higher shift points, so it ought to seem more fun than before. 

We’d lay odds that the lighter, torquier Mk1 vRS would still give it a run for its money, but Skoda has also gone to the trouble of fitting sports suspension (15mm lower than standard) alongside 18-inch alloys and ‘recalibrated steering’, so it ought to corner more aggressively. It has been breathed on visually, too, with a light smattering of spoiler and diffuser to go with some bespoke badging, and even mildly conspicuous twin tailpipes. Imagine! 

Inside, there are slightly more sporty front seats and an appropriately generous amount of kit for a supermini that starts at £29,995. If that thought has you spluttering sandwich all over your screen, we geddit - barely five years ago, you could buy a limited edition Fiesta ST for significantly less than that and it would come with 200hp and coilovers and a manual gearbox. But beggars, we’re told, cannot be choosers. Or not choosy anyway, because it’s either this or a VW Polo GTI or a Mini JCW, which cost from £31,415 and £33,265 respectively. Tempted? 


Author
Discussion

Mike1990

Original Poster:

1,120 posts

151 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
Can't see nothing wrong with that at all.

Look's good, specs appear good. Its great to see another warm/hot-hatch make an appearance!

dunnoreally

1,356 posts

128 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
I'm very happy to see it in principle because we need more cars like this. However, especially given it seems a bit less hardcore than some heroes of the recent past, I do wonder how many people will actually be able to justify the price.

Gecko1978

12,188 posts

177 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
Needs to be bright green

trevalvole

1,860 posts

53 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
Article said:
the last time the manufacturer applied a vRS badge to its supermini, it signified the presence of a diesel engine
Correct, if you ignore the mk2 1.4TSI petrol one.

Article said:
Its solution is the Fabia 130, a celebratory (because 130 years of Skoda) new range-topper breathlessly described as the ‘fastest production’ derivative to date.
and the mk2's quoted 0-62 time was 7.3s.

TikTak

2,627 posts

39 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
I mean I like it but in todays market it's not quick at all and it's still £31k and for most people """it's not big enough""" even if it definitely would be.

Hopefully people are queuing up for it but sadly, I doubt it.

WPA

13,097 posts

134 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
£30k for a warm Fabia, bonkers

Also the quoted 0-60 for the mk2 (1.4-litre twin-charged) was 7.1 so not sure how this can be the fastest ever Fabia

CraigyMc

18,041 posts

256 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
WPA said:
£30k for a warm Fabia, bonkers

Also the quoted 0-60 for the mk2 (1.4-litre twin-charged) was 7.1 so not sure how this can be the fastest ever Fabia
Because 142mph is faster than 139mph, I would expect.

cerb4.5lee

40,250 posts

200 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
Mike1990 said:
Can't see nothing wrong with that at all.

Look's good, specs appear good. Its great to see another warm/hot-hatch make an appearance!
I like your username...because I was driving around in a 1982 Skoda Estelle back in 1990! biggrin

ChrisCh86

1,076 posts

64 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
trevalvole said:
Article said:
the last time the manufacturer applied a vRS badge to its supermini, it signified the presence of a diesel engine
Correct, if you ignore the mk2 1.4TSI petrol one.

Article said:
Its solution is the Fabia 130, a celebratory (because 130 years of Skoda) new range-topper breathlessly described as the fastest production derivative to date.
and the mk2's quoted 0-62 time was 7.3s.
Exactly! There's been two Skoda Fabia VRS', the original with the 2.0 TDI, and the MK2 with the 1.4TSI also shared with the Polo GTI and Seat Ibiza. Come on PH, do some proper research next time!

bangerhoarder

697 posts

88 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
ChrisCh86 said:
Exactly! There's been two Skoda Fabia VRS', the original with the 1.9 TDI, and the MK2 with the 1.4TSI also shared with the Polo GTI and Seat Ibiza. Come on PH, do some proper research next time!
EFA.

OddCat

2,760 posts

191 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
Gecko1978 said:
Needs to be bright green
Orange would do though....

dukebox9reg

1,671 posts

168 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
obviously still massively restricted by the 7spd dry DSG with the torque being capped.

just to reply to other comments
Fastest = top speed
Quickest = Acceleration

Hub

6,918 posts

218 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
trevalvole said:
Article said:
the last time the manufacturer applied a vRS badge to its supermini, it signified the presence of a diesel engine
Correct, if you ignore the mk2 1.4TSI petrol one.

Article said:
Its solution is the Fabia 130, a celebratory (because 130 years of Skoda) new range-topper breathlessly described as the fastest production derivative to date.
and the mk2's quoted 0-62 time was 7.3s.
Quite. I was also going to say this. The MK2 was also about 178hp I think? laugh

Not to mention the MK1 VRS was second only to a mapped 335d on the road as the quickest production car of its time....

Still, I'm glad it exists. Everyone will think it is a 130bhp tepid hatch though and not understand the 130 years or the Skoda 130 RS reference.

Hairymonster

1,663 posts

125 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
Do they make a manual version?

Wren-went

1,029 posts

58 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
I like this Fabia but not at £30 grand seems at least £5000 too much, as someone else mentioned the MK2 Fabia was also a VRS from when VAG used the quick but extremely unreliable Twin charge 1.4 which at the time give decent performance from the Supercharged Turbocharged engine

I'm sure that was definitely quicker to 60. Weren't they between a 170 to 185bhp depending on what the engine was in.
At £30,000 needs to have VRS badges on it & made to look more like it's something special.

FPC

90 posts

71 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
I would. Love a warm hatch but agree with previous poster, this seems about £5k too expensive.

I'm so old that 177bhp still sounds impressive! I can't get past a 205 GTi having an impressive 130 in 1.9 form... I know, I know...

I suppose this will weigh a bit more than 80's/90's tin but I expect it'll still feeling lively enough to me.

rossub

5,402 posts

210 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
Not really quick enough, but a re-map would sort that out.

blueovercream

343 posts

111 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
Overall a positive thing, if a bit bland looking

As an aside it's a little sad that this is now considered a "supermini" - it's very nearly the same size as a Mk 7 Golf

fernandosthirdtitle

13 posts

20 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
30k😳

Firebobby

896 posts

59 months

Tuesday 7th October
quotequote all
Instead of jumping in with the size nines on saying " it's not the fastest cus blah, blah, blah..read the article correctly. It says it's the "fastest" not the " quickest" At least they're still producing a small "quickish" car that runs on petrol!