RE: Driven: BMW 640i Coupe
RE: Driven: BMW 640i Coupe
Friday 8th July 2011

Driven: BMW 640i Coupe

On the road in BMW's big GT, now fitted with a big-hearted straight six



The thing about the new 6-series is that it appears to know its target market intimately. And those customers, by and large, do not buy their BMWs to be an Ultimate Driving Machine. They are also overwhelmingly American.

This almost certainly explains why the convertible 6-series was launched before the coupe, and why the folks who presented the coupe to us at the press launch were so proud to report that one can fit three (count 'em) golf bags into the boot.

It also explains why, despite the fact that 90 per cent of UK customers will opt for the thumping 308bhp, 469lb ft diesel, we have yet to drive that too. Not that the 3.0-litre straight six we tried is a poor substitute, mind. Its twin-scroll turbocharger helps provide it with consistently impressive and linear thrust, and giving a convincing impression of having rather more cylinders than is actually the case.


The 316bhp and 332lb ft of torque (from 1300rpm to 4500rpm, no less) is also enough to propel the big six-er to 62mph from rest in 5.4secs and onto 155mph. This is a genuinely impressive feat when you consider that at 1660kg it's 130kg chunkier than its nearest ancestor, the old 630i. The only remotely negative point we can come up with for this engine is that the turbos muffle the straight-six wail. But we're used to that on modern BMWs, so we could live with it.

The 8-speed auto gearbox, complete with paddles, also works in seamless harmony with the engine, giving you the right gear at the right time and kicking down with verve (although we could live without the artificial-feeling jerkiness in 'manual' changes - swapping ratios is a super-smooth affair in full auto mode, so why give the manual mode a faux-racy feel?).


The gearbox's response is also further tailored by the switch that allows you to cycle between sport+, sport, comfort+, comfort and 'eco pro' (read cruising), and which adjusts throttle response, steering reaction, suspension settings (and of course the gearbox) according to your mood.

The chassis is perhaps not quite so willing to adjust to your mood. There is no doubting the essential solidity and basic, for want of a better word, rightness about the car, but this is still a large, heavy GT and it feels it, despite being a commendable 63 per cent stiffer than the old 6-series coupe.


The levels of grip are prodigious, but there just isn't a great deal of adjustability, of interactivity, and that leaves you feeling as though it's just a little bit cold. Capable, sure, but not the sort of car you would go out of your way to point at a twisty road. The optional active steering doesn't help either; it's generally faithful and direct, but occasionally there's an odd inconsistency to the weighting as the system adjusts itself to the car's speed and how much turning you want to do.

Perhaps it's just us, but we felt the interior was a tad cold, too - especially for a £60k car. It's unquestionably well built, and all the toys you expect of a big GT are there (the colour HUD and optional B & O sound system are particularly impressive), but it doesn't stir the soul (well, not this PHer's soul, at least - and I'm a big BMW fan).


And that's kind of a metaphor for the whole car, really. It's good, it really is, but for People Like Us (i.e. committed petrolheads), it probably isn't quite exciting enough. No doubt the forthcoming M6 version will sort that out, mind...

Full spec sheet for the BMW 640i Coupe

 




 

Author
Discussion

MogulBoy

Original Poster:

3,066 posts

254 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
Surely it must be in the running for a prize for the biggest integrated TFT screen on a dashboard ever?

I have had a quick nosey at one of these and I must say I really liked the look of it a lot.

Same sort of cash as 'a decent 911' but presumably much more 'comfortable', especially if you need to squeeze anyone in the back.

I can certainly see the appeal to those who would buy a car like this to commute to work in. It's a shame that review of the driving experience of this version doesn't quite measure up to the potential ownership experience if you are able to nail the specification to your taste.

PaulFontaine

629 posts

185 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
It's a car that grows on you I think I didn't really like them when they first came out but now I see the benefit of them. It is amazing that they are able to create variants that run the gamut of being anywhere from sporty luxury to eye wateringly fast (M6). Consider that 20 years later it is still less than the 8 series of the early 90's and you can wrap your head around the price

M666 EVO

1,129 posts

193 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
Dashboards are getting more and more 'Knight Rider'...

OdramaSwimLaden

1,971 posts

200 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
I like it. In so many ways I prefer it to the 911....and it's just that little bit quirkier!

I recently picked up and A8 4.2Tdi and the only reason it won over the 6-series D was space.

MarJay

2,181 posts

206 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
Article said:
the switch that allows you to cycle between sport+, sport, comfort+, comfort and 'eco pro' (read cruising), and which adjusts throttle response, steering reaction, suspension settings (and of course the gearbox) according to your mood.
Adjustable steering reaction... That sounds like a recipie for 'remote' steering feel. An Elise it aint, granted, but its supposed to be a BMW coupe...

LuS1fer

43,555 posts

276 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
I could never buy a 640 which by rights should be a 630...it's dishonest. wink

Looks like a car every American will love.

Caulkhead

4,938 posts

188 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
I struggle to understand why anyone would buy a 640i with a 3.0 turbo six when you can have a Jaguar XK 5.0 V8 for the same money with 385bhp, a fabulous V8 rumble and bark, better kit and a vastly superior ride.

MrTickle

1,825 posts

270 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
I wonder if the new M6 can match the old M6 for depreciation speed? hehe

Mine went from £92,000 list to £34,000 trade in 2 years and 12K miles dead! yikes

Although I did trade it out at back end of 2008 TBF

LayZ

1,836 posts

273 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
90% will be diesels? I like diesels but in a car like this its a bit depressing.

dele

1,270 posts

225 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
MarJay said:
Article said:
the switch that allows you to cycle between sport+, sport, comfort+, comfort and 'eco pro' (read cruising), and which adjusts throttle response, steering reaction, suspension settings (and of course the gearbox) according to your mood.
Adjustable steering reaction... That sounds like a recipie for 'remote' steering feel. An Elise it aint, granted, but its supposed to be a BMW coupe...
Drive an E92 M3 which id imagine has the same system as this and you'll be surprised

Webber3

1,228 posts

250 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
LayZ said:
90% will be diesels? I like diesels but in a car like this its a bit depressing.
That's what I was thinking. I find that very hard to believe. If you want to save money, get a 3 series or a Mondeo, not a 6!

daveco

4,418 posts

238 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
My god, the front is a right mess.

Don't know what to make of these new BMW's-They're dull but OTT at the same time.

BRING BACK BMW BANGLES YOU BLOODY BAR STEWARDS

tr7v8

7,625 posts

259 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
Caulkhead said:
I struggle to understand why anyone would buy a 640i with a 3.0 turbo six when you can have a Jaguar XK 5.0 V8 for the same money with 385bhp, a fabulous V8 rumble and bark, better kit and a vastly superior ride.
Not a BMW fan anyway but this is just yawn. I'd have an XK any day of the week, looks better & a much better engine. Or a 911... would be difficult for me.

Chris-R

756 posts

218 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
MrTickle said:
I wonder if the new M6 can match the old M6 for depreciation speed? hehe

Mine went from £92,000 list to £34,000 trade in 2 years and 12K miles dead! yikes

Although I did trade it out at back end of 2008 TBF
Ouch. Still, at least you can laugh about it... smile

mike325112

1,074 posts

215 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
M666 EVO said:
Dashboards are getting more and more 'Knight Rider'...
I thought it looked more than a bit Audi to be honest (nat saying thats a bad thing). Especially around the gear leavel and centre consol.

chazwozza

992 posts

217 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
bland-looking.com

alock

4,572 posts

242 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
tr7v8 said:
Caulkhead said:
I struggle to understand why anyone would buy a 640i with a 3.0 turbo six when you can have a Jaguar XK 5.0 V8 for the same money with 385bhp, a fabulous V8 rumble and bark, better kit and a vastly superior ride.
Not a BMW fan anyway but this is just yawn. I'd have an XK any day of the week, looks better & a much better engine. Or a 911... would be difficult for me.
Have you tried carrying adult passengers in the back of an XK? It's a bit of a laugh for an occasional short journey. Wouldn't want to do it regularly though.

OdramaSwimLaden

1,971 posts

200 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
MrTickle said:
I wonder if the new M6 can match the old M6 for depreciation speed? hehe

Mine went from £92,000 list to £34,000 trade in 2 years and 12K miles dead! yikes

Although I did trade it out at back end of 2008 TBF
My initial thought was "BS".....then I looked!!

I guess they take it off you and put it up at £40k ish.....wow.

jbi

12,700 posts

235 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
I really like that... got real road presence


kambites

71,660 posts

252 months

Thursday 7th July 2011
quotequote all
That really is an astonishingly ugly car. The proportions are awful, it looks squashed.

At least the old one had character in abundance, even if it did look rather odd.