RE: 2021 Porsche Taycan Sport Turismo | PH Review
RE: 2021 Porsche Taycan Sport Turismo | PH Review
Thursday 16th December 2021

2021 Porsche Taycan Sport Turismo | PH Review

The estate model is the Taycan some buyers have been waiting for - has Porsche delivered?



I can't help thinking about buses when I look at the Porsche Taycan range. No, no, I don't mean in the way it drives. The Taycan's 2.3-tonne kerbweight might be verging on Routemasterish, but I'm talking about the other kind of wait - i.e. the long one we had to endure before the start of Porsche's electric era, followed by what seems like a non-stop stream of new variants ever since.

First was the four-door coupé in 4S, Turbo and Turbo S form. Then we got less power and fewer motors with the RWD model, which reduced the entrance fee to around £70k. Then, last September, things took an odd twist. The Cross Turismo injected a perplexing whiff of SUV into what is, by any metric, a very high-performance low-slung car. And by 'whiff' we're talking enough off-roading talent to see you up a gravel drive and, at a push, out of a festival car park, but not much more. What the Cross Turismo did deliver, though, was some added practicality.

Last month, we drove the GTS. That was on track, but still, the conclusion was clear enough: it's the best Taycan yet. Now, if only you could get the GTS's bespoke suspension tuning, torque vectoring and sweet-spot power with the Cross Turismo's estate-car vibe. That would surely have 'winner' written all over it, right?

Well, happily, Porsche has backed such a winner. We should point out that the Taycan Sport Turismo is available in the various flavours of the Coupé, but we just happened to be driving the GTS version at its launch in Mallorca. And this time, on the road, allowing us a fuller picture of its talents.



I'll be honest, I still struggle to find that spasm of enthusiasm deep in the belly when it comes to EVs - even known-to-be-good ones, like the Taycan. So as I walked up to the Sport Turismo, I found myself disappointed at my own glum negativism. "Well, it's not a GT3 RS, is it." How jaded. But the good news is that it didn't take long for the Sport Turismo GTS to whip that scorn into a smile, and the stimulus was very unexpected.

It was the noise. The GTS comes with its own, unique Porsche Sport Sound composer and, when I switched it on, its low-speed output was a bit too Millennium Falcon for my taste. Just mooching around, there's this weird, wah-wah-pedal fluctuating drone. Then I broke out onto Mallorca's equivalent of an A-road and tested the Taycan's straight-line metal, and it wasn't just the familiar, instant hit of torque and KITT-style uptick of numbers on the digital speedo that tickled me. But it was also the change in that tone.

There's the natural noise that all Taycans produce under load. It's a sort of straight-cut whine, but I've never fully ascertained its source. Maybe it's the electromagnetic hum from the motors or the two-speed gearbox at the rear. Or a bit of both. Either way, I like it. On top of that, the GTS-specific synthesiser adds a hard-edged, vaguely internal-combustion noise. I am not normally into faux stuff but this is good; even if I couldn't for the life of me pin it down to a particular cylinder arrangement. But the bit that finally had me - the point at which I broke into an actual, fully-formed grin - was the 'throttle blip' as the gearbox shifts from second to first. It's as fake as the scripting on X Factor, yet I fell for it. Again and again.



When you're 'on it' all these little noises add a competition-car feel, which isn't dumbed down by the fantastically low, bathtub driving position. You sit there looking at the world coming at you through the surprisingly narrow windscreen. At each corner, you see the hump of a wheel arch rising up and, behind you, there's the sense of a lot of car stretching back. Allow the schoolboy mind to run wild, as mine often does, and there's something of the 956 about it. Fantasies aside, there's no denying that it does have a great cabin; one that the GTS's swathes of Race-Tex, red seatbelts and anodised aluminium do nothing to diminish.

It's helpful to have those front wings peaking above the scuttle to define the Sport Turismo's extremities, especially along these often-narrow Mallorcan roads. In any guise, the Taycan is a very wide car. Thank God, then, that the steering is so pin-sharp and intuitive. You can place the wheels with finite accuracy and, despite the weight, revel at the suspension's utter brilliance in keeping things settled. It allows you the opportunity to explore the grip - and there's never anything less than lots of it. In fact,you need to be very determined to upset the Sport Turismo's natural balance, but it is possible. Just switch off the ESP and plunge the accelerator on the exit of a roundabout and your reward is a delectable slide.

The Sport Turismo GTS is so good that it's hard to separate the adroit engineering from the old-school witchcraft but, for me, the suspension's prowess tops the list. How does it control vertical movements so beautifully, with so much mass to deal with and relatively little wheel travel? And on top of that, how is the ride so supple? By any measure, S-Class included, the Taycan is one of the best-riding cars on sale. It's also one of the quietest at speed. Yes, there are the noises I mentioned earlier when you gun it, but when you're at a steady speed, the sense of silence is fantastic.



Officially, the range is 304 miles, but that's going to be nearer 250 in the real world. Thankfully you can rely on the accuracy of the Taycan's range indicator and the fact that it can charge at up to 270kW, which means a 10 to 80 per cent charge in under 20 minutes. Are there any quibbles? A couple, yes. There's some regen corruption in the brakes, which means the pedal isn't as consistent as it could be, and the Sport Turismo's boot still isn't up there with an E-Class wagon's. That said, 446 litres is still a decent amount, which grows to 1,212-litres when you drop the rear seats, with another 84 litres in its nose.

Rear-passengers do okay, too. There's a sensible amount of leg room to fit six-footers behind six-footers, and the Sport Turismo adds another 45 millimetres of rear headroom. It also showcases Porsche's latest piece of tech - the Variable Light Control. This option applies a liquid crystal film to glass roof that is divided into nine sections and each can be switched to one of four settings, from clear to translucent, to prevent glare but still allow light into the cabin.

The last time I wrote about the Taycan, I said that the GTS was the best version yet. Well, there's no point in having a mind if you cannot change it, especially when the best keeps getting better. With its added practicality and still-great everything else, the Taycan GTS Sports Turismo is now easily the best Taycan, which, by default, makes it the best electric car you can buy. Not least because it can make you smile, even if you're a old cynic like me.


SPECIFICATION | PORSCHE TAYCAN GTS SPORT TURISMO

Engine: Dual electric motor
Transmission: Front - Single-speed auto, rear - two-speed auto, all-wheel drive
Power (hp): 598hp
Torque (lb ft): 627
0-62mph: 3.7 secs
Top speed: 155mph
Weight: 2,310kg (unladen)
Battery size (kWh): 93.4
Energy usage (miles/kWh): 2.96
WLTP range (combined): 304 miles
Price: £104,990






Author
Discussion

cib24

Original Poster:

1,127 posts

183 months

Tuesday 14th December 2021
quotequote all
Great looking car and stance. The sheer width is it’s only sticking point. How much is it with a sensible list of options?

Minimarvel

7 posts

127 months

Tuesday 14th December 2021
quotequote all
Just ugly. Two car designs forced together, badly.

oedipus

455 posts

96 months

Tuesday 14th December 2021
quotequote all
Please check your copy before submission.

NDNDNDND

2,546 posts

213 months

Wednesday 15th December 2021
quotequote all
Minimarvel said:
Just ugly. Two car designs forced together, badly.
I was about to argue with you, but then checked the view from the front.

Yeah, it's ugly. From behind, the proportions and stance and design are just perfect. But the front... hmmm.

It reminds of a Japanese phrase 'Bakushan', which roughly translates as 'a woman who is beautiful when viewed from behind, but ugly from the front'.





anonymous-user

84 months

Wednesday 15th December 2021
quotequote all
Reserve judgement till you see one in the metal. It doesn't photograph well IMO but works IRL

stuthemong

2,534 posts

247 months

Wednesday 15th December 2021
quotequote all
I'm liking this a lot.

MyV10BarksAndBites

1,705 posts

79 months

Wednesday 15th December 2021
quotequote all
Looks brilliant!!!

drpep

1,761 posts

198 months

Wednesday 15th December 2021
quotequote all
Looks like it has the same break over angle as a dining tray. Thankfully, Chelsea is pretty flat.

Still, definitely one of the better EVs and thankfully Porsche are continuing to focus on the driver from the sounds of things.

RichTT

3,266 posts

201 months

Wednesday 15th December 2021
quotequote all
NDNDNDND said:
I was about to argue with you, but then checked the view from the front.

Yeah, it's ugly. From behind, the proportions and stance and design are just perfect. But the front... hmmm.

It reminds of a Japanese phrase 'Bakushan', which roughly translates as 'a woman who is beautiful when viewed from behind, but ugly from the front'.
I'm the opposite. Front view, lovely, rear three quarters, handsome, side view, gopping.

Kipsrs

721 posts

79 months

Wednesday 15th December 2021
quotequote all
In my very humble opinion. . This looks absolutely fantastic, and in the flesh I imagine even better.
That’s how to make a car look good and wanted, not pointing finger at any other German manufacturers!!!
And as I said at the beginning, in my humble opinion.

Crumpet

5,459 posts

210 months

Wednesday 15th December 2021
quotequote all
A Porsche I like - from every angle. This gives me hope that there may be life after the ICE. That price, though!

dandare

959 posts

284 months

Wednesday 15th December 2021
quotequote all
NDNDNDND said:
Minimarvel said:
Just ugly. Two car designs forced together, badly.
I was about to argue with you, but then checked the view from the front.

Yeah, it's ugly. From behind, the proportions and stance and design are just perfect. But the front... hmmm.

It reminds of a Japanese phrase 'Bakushan', which roughly translates as 'a woman who is beautiful when viewed from behind, but ugly from the front'.
It's "Beethoven" in Chinese for the same. Why don't we have a single word for it?smile

Overall, I like the look of the car. The headlights don't look quite right to my eyes, but certainly better than many cars of its size and type (ignoring its electric power).
Black rear windows still look stupid. Why would they do that?

pmanson

13,388 posts

283 months

Wednesday 15th December 2021
quotequote all
We’ve been running a CT 4S since October. Couple of thousand miles in and we love it


anonymous-user

84 months

Wednesday 15th December 2021
quotequote all
oedipus said:
Please check your copy before submission.
I always hold off from this, but gosh, that is necessary feedback. Please, there are so many errors that it’s hard to read.

LooneyTunes

9,476 posts

188 months

Wednesday 15th December 2021
quotequote all
PH said:
There's the natural noise that all Taycan's produce under load. It's a sort of straight-cut whine, but I've never fully ascertained its source. Maybe it's the electromagnetic hum from motors or the two-speed gearbox at the rear. Or a bit of both
Not sure where it comes from either, but MrsLT was told it was designed in… given what they’ve done with the “sport sound” option, makes me wonder if it’s piped through the speakers.

I quite like the look of the Sport Tourismo. Tbh, prefer it to the regular Taycan.

Alpenus

224 posts

60 months

Wednesday 15th December 2021
quotequote all
I'll wait for the SUV version

stimpy888

15 posts

186 months

Wednesday 15th December 2021
quotequote all
NDNDNDND said:
Minimarvel said:
Just ugly. Two car designs forced together, badly.
I was about to argue with you, but then checked the view from the front.

Yeah, it's ugly. From behind, the proportions and stance and design are just perfect. But the front... hmmm.

It reminds of a Japanese phrase 'Bakushan', which roughly translates as 'a woman who is beautiful when viewed from behind, but ugly from the front'.
I once knew a woman with the nickname "Kronenbourg" for that very reason. 16 from the back, 64 from the front!


JerryF

333 posts

204 months

Wednesday 15th December 2021
quotequote all
It's not pretty (in my eyes). But then most Porsches aren't beautiful.

However, the sticking point must be price. It seems that electric cars have hyper inflation built in.

We have an EV Mini, fantastic at its job, but compared to an ICE MINI, expensive.

Martyn76

843 posts

147 months

Wednesday 15th December 2021
quotequote all
NDNDNDND said:
Minimarvel said:
Just ugly. Two car designs forced together, badly.
I was about to argue with you, but then checked the view from the front.

Yeah, it's ugly. From behind, the proportions and stance and design are just perfect. But the front... hmmm.

It reminds of a Japanese phrase 'Bakushan', which roughly translates as 'a woman who is beautiful when viewed from behind, but ugly from the front'.
I'm committing this to memory and will use it ASAP, you have to love the Japanese! laugh

Nickbrapp

5,277 posts

160 months

Wednesday 15th December 2021
quotequote all
I love the way this looks but 250 miles range is just pitiful when to me, electric cars should be more about pushing the boundaries of range than the boundaries of very easily achieved speed

100k for 250 miles when a EQS is about the same price and a potential range of 400