RE: £10k Porsche Cayman | High Mile Club
RE: £10k Porsche Cayman | High Mile Club
Monday 4th April 2022

£10k Porsche Cayman | High Mile Club

There surely won't be many more chances for a 987 at £9,995 - this one even looks quite good...



The Porsche Cayman has been in the news quite a lot recently. The GT4 RS is one of the best sports cars ever made at little more than £100,000 (it'll probably seem good value at whatever they're sold for, too), and then comes a change even bigger than the GT3 engine swap: the electric Cayman. The entire 718 range will be battery powered by the middle of the decade, says Porsche; between that and the launch of the RS, it's brought into focus what we love most about the small Porsche sports cars. A lovely flat-six, specifically. A manual would be quite nice to have, too, given their scarcity...

Of course, there aren't many old Porsche Caymans that aren't appealing in one form or another. The Tiptronic auto isn't a patch on the later PDK, but six cylinders will always be attached - and much the same argument can be made for the early 2.7 and its slightly meagre power output. Even the flat-four cars remain a joy to drive, if less so to listen to. It's why they've remained in demand after all this time.

It was assumed the days of the £10k Cayman were gone, such is the current state of the market and the regard in which so many old Porsches are held. But here we have what'll surely be one of the last: a 2008 2.7 manual at £9,995. You know why it's so cheap; if this car were a batsman it'd be acknowledging the crowd for a third time, currently sitting at 152,000 not out. Which means you assume it's a basket case, not least with seven owners. And yes, the seller does admit to some blemishes, and the tyres don't have loads of life left in them.


But look at the history - it seems a good one. There are 15 stamps in the book (it'd probably benefit from another now, in truth), and the MOT history is almost spotless. The most recent test was red before it was green, but before that this Porsche had gone from 2011 (at 62,000 miles) to 2022 and almost 100,000 more with just one advisory. Impressive. Though these things can't be said with absolute certainty, you'd hope that sort of result points to diligent ownership. And better a sports car with some miles on it than perishing through lack of use, right?

This Cayman's spec, if safe, isn't likely to offend, either. The wheels are in decent nick, the leather has held up well and, if you'll excuse the cliché, it could surely pass for a car much fresher with a good polish. Any of the engine issues that afflicted the six-cylinder cars of this era must surely have been dealt with now, or else never presented a problem.

And if you'll join us in looking on the 'grass is always greener' side of things here, a less than concours example is actually a great opportunity. A new owner won't have to worry about preserving a car in factory fresh condition with only OEM parts, because this'll never be a minter. Instead they can sympathetically upgrade as they go, replacing parts as they wear out with slightly better ones than were there before. A 2.7 Cayman is never going to be especially fast - not without a huge spend, that is - but it would surely become an even more enjoyable sports car with some money invested in the right places. There's a reason they've been crowed on about all these years. Furthermore, with the future looking as it is, don't be surprised if a 200,000-mile 2.7 is worth £9,995 in the years to come. Stranger things have happened...

See the original advert here.






Author
Discussion

pSyCoSiS

Original Poster:

4,343 posts

236 months

Monday 4th April 2022
quotequote all
I think the Porsches can wear the high miles pretty well.

I saw a 2009 911 with 280k miles the other week, and it was still up for a fair premium.

Slowlygettingit

947 posts

72 months

Monday 4th April 2022
quotequote all
I don’t like that shape as much as the newer models - mainly round the rear wings and the rump. But for £10k to potter round in, it’s looks an interesting prospect.
Guessing maintenance and overall running costs wouldn’t be too bad compared to a nearly new warm hatch that’s still depreciating. Or is that just Man Maths?

humphra

636 posts

123 months

Monday 4th April 2022
quotequote all
To be fair, it's only a little over "average" mileage for its age, it's just that these types of cars aren't typically daily drivers too rack up average mileage.

cerb4.5lee

45,269 posts

211 months

Monday 4th April 2022
quotequote all
The shape doesn't do much for me, but I would love a go in one of these though. I've never driven a mid engined car, and I've only ever had front engined cars and one rear engined car.

anonymous-user

85 months

Monday 4th April 2022
quotequote all
What were they thinking with that window tinting?

Not sure it's amazing value either. I bought a 2005 987 Boxster 2.7 last year with 82k on it, and far better spec than this car, for just £10750.

pb8g09

3,295 posts

100 months

Monday 4th April 2022
quotequote all
These are on the list for my next car. I really want to try one.

Trouble is, they seem to be priced so strongly that I just don't have the guts for this. I'd happily buy it and drive it, but I'm not confident that I'll convince someone else to pay much back on the £10k when I've added another 15k miles on it and another owner on that list in 3 years time. I can just imagine being bullied by the dealer on the p/x.


KPB1973

938 posts

130 months

Monday 4th April 2022
quotequote all
pb8g09 said:
These are on the list for my next car. I really want to try one.

Trouble is, they seem to be priced so strongly that I just don't have the guts for this. I'd happily buy it and drive it, but I'm not confident that I'll convince someone else to pay much back on the £10k when I've added another 15k miles on it and another owner on that list in 3 years time. I can just imagine being bullied by the dealer on the p/x.
Yep that's where i'm at too. A decent 'S' with sub-100k miles is only a short jump away, budget-wise. I think (borescore check aside) you'd get all of that extra money back at the end of ownership. I'm not sure the same can be said of this one because attracting a private sale would be a challenge.

Or get a nice 986S for a few grand less and watch the value go in the other direction.

But either way, Baby Porker ownership can be expensive if you don't buy carefully. A nice £13k one with low miles might need a clutch and flywheel, which will make an unaware buyer's eyes water.

Plus, that boot badge looks gash.


p4cks

7,547 posts

230 months

Monday 4th April 2022
quotequote all
Ticking time bomb. Literally ticking too most likely

anonymous-user

85 months

Monday 4th April 2022
quotequote all
p4cks said:
Ticking time bomb. Literally ticking too most likely
Mine has been a reliable daily for 8 years now. The Cayman / Boxster platform has always been very, very solid.

anonymous-user

85 months

Monday 4th April 2022
quotequote all
Funkstar De Luxe said:
p4cks said:
Ticking time bomb. Literally ticking too most likely
Mine has been a reliable daily for 8 years now. The Cayman / Boxster platform has always been very, very solid.
Particularly with the 2.7.

WayOutWest

1,271 posts

89 months

Monday 4th April 2022
quotequote all
These are great cars and a great drive, but just spend an extra £5k or so and you can find one with half that mileage that has been looked after.
And it will probably need that extra money spent anyway within a year. 20k miles since last service tells you how much it has been cared for lately.
Looks like even the dealer cannot be bothered to service it.

wpa1975

14,853 posts

145 months

Monday 4th April 2022
quotequote all
It is cheap yes but high bork factor, might be better to spend the extra and get a better car that has had the required work.

eMpowered

22 posts

185 months

Monday 4th April 2022
quotequote all
I picked up my 2009 987.2 Cayman as a daily driver in October 2019 - it was on 141k at the time and I've added another 23k since. Spent a reasonable amount on it last year, but mostly age-related items rather than wear due to the mileage, and as the article mentions it's a good opportunity for upgrades (highly recommend the 997 GT3 shifter for the manual 'box!). I haven't regretted a penny though, it's a fabulous daily and makes even the most mundane journeys better. We're @a.cayman.called.eeyore on Insta if you're interested in what else has been done.

Granted, the later 2.9 engine is more reliable than the 2.7, but at this mileage you would expect the known issues to have already been addressed. Interior parts/trim etc. are easy to source and replace too, to refresh a tired car if needed.

The price of this one is very telling of the current market though - mine cost even less than this is up for...

Turbobanana

8,561 posts

232 months

Monday 4th April 2022
quotequote all
I'm planning to sell my Saab Convertible when (if?) the weather improves, and a Boxster / Cayman is well up the list as its replacement.

To be honest, I've had enough of open-top motoring so a Cayman would do nicely, and something like this would still be in budget. It would be a third car, so high mileage not an issue and it would do no more that 3 or 4000 miles annually. So I'm watching stuff such as this like a hawk at the moment.

Which is why I've noticed, particularly with the Cayman, just how dull they all look. It seems as though Porsche's colour samples book lost a page: they're all black, dark blue, silver, grey or white. Boxsters are a little better, but not much. And the 987 interior looks no more special a place to be than that of a Polo. At least the 986 / 996-style interior had some flair to it. I'm sure it's all high quality, soft-feel plastics etc but £10,000 is (for me) still quite a chunk of money to spend on an "unnecessary" car, and I want something a little more special personally.

WayOutWest

1,271 posts

89 months

Monday 4th April 2022
quotequote all
Turbobanana said:
I'm planning to sell my Saab Convertible when (if?) the weather improves, and a Boxster / Cayman is well up the list as its replacement.

To be honest, I've had enough of open-top motoring so a Cayman would do nicely, and something like this would still be in budget. It would be a third car, so high mileage not an issue and it would do no more that 3 or 4000 miles annually. So I'm watching stuff such as this like a hawk at the moment.

Which is why I've noticed, particularly with the Cayman, just how dull they all look. It seems as though Porsche's colour samples book lost a page: they're all black, dark blue, silver, grey or white. Boxsters are a little better, but not much. And the 987 interior looks no more special a place to be than that of a Polo. At least the 986 / 996-style interior had some flair to it. I'm sure it's all high quality, soft-feel plastics etc but £10,000 is (for me) still quite a chunk of money to spend on an "unnecessary" car, and I want something a little more special personally.
Agree they can be dreary, especially due to the monochrome colours which must have been on trend at the time they were made.
I held out for a guards red one with part alcantara seats and a recent alcantara steering wheel retrim and it does look and feel a bit more special than some of the others I've looked at.

redroadster

1,886 posts

263 months

Monday 4th April 2022
quotequote all
Iim giving it a year before I buy a cayman, wait till cost of living kicks in and I think market will drop, lovely cars you really don't need much more on rds than one of these quick enough.

thomablue

41 posts

185 months

Monday 4th April 2022
quotequote all
Speedo change ?-The dates and mileages in service book don't make any sense.The 132k service mentioned is dated 12/2017.Service dated 03/21 is at 47310 miles.

anonymous-user

85 months

Monday 4th April 2022
quotequote all
eMpowered said:
Granted, the later 2.9 engine is more reliable than the 2.7, but at this mileage you would expect the known issues to have already been addressed. Interior parts/trim etc. are easy to source and replace too, to refresh a tired car if needed.
I’m not sure I’d agree with that. The 2.9 is direct injection, isn’t it? The 2.7 doesn’t appear to have many known issues where as (as far as I know) direct injection engines can be a pain in the neck due to carbon build up and fancy injectors.

Posting a pic of mine



Edited by anonymous-user on Monday 4th April 13:37

danp

1,658 posts

293 months

Monday 4th April 2022
quotequote all
Funkstar De Luxe said:
I’m not sure I’d agree with that. The 2.9 is direct injection, isn’t it? The 2.7 doesn’t appear to have many known issues where as (as far as I know) direct injection engines can be a pain in the neck due to carbon build up and fancy injectors.

Posting a pic of mine



Edited by Funkstar De Luxe on Monday 4th April 13:37
No the 2.9 isn’t direct injection, for example:

https://www.autocar.co.uk/car-review/porsche/cayma...

anonymous-user

85 months

Monday 4th April 2022
quotequote all
danp said:
No the 2.9 isn’t direct injection, for example:

https://www.autocar.co.uk/car-review/porsche/cayma...
Oh, I didn't know that! Thanks for the correction!