Advice from any professional Autel users
Advice from any professional Autel users
Author
Discussion

Phil-8c2p0

Original Poster:

5 posts

114 months

Thursday 7th April 2022
quotequote all
Hi.

I'm looking for help to try to determine whether a diagnostic check, carried out by a garage several months ago, can be recalled, via the software, and reprinted. Specifically, in the report attached, I need to understand if the date shown is the date it was carried out, or the date it may have been reprinted. Strange request, I know, but it's evidence in a court case. Many thanks in anticipation.



Edited by Phil-8c2p0 on Thursday 7th April 22:10

anonymous-user

85 months

Thursday 7th April 2022
quotequote all
Sorry I don’t have a response but it would be a good idea to blur out your VIN number for security

Haltamer

2,679 posts

111 months

Thursday 7th April 2022
quotequote all
Most likely, yes - I have one of their Autel AP200 Plug in readers that works with a phone; The diagnostic reports generated are saved in the app, and can be exported as PDF.

May be worth contacting them to ask?

mwstewart

8,610 posts

219 months

Thursday 7th April 2022
quotequote all
They store reports, yes. Obviously, it is only the owner of the device whom has access to the stored file.

Phil-8c2p0

Original Poster:

5 posts

114 months

Thursday 7th April 2022
quotequote all
sleepera6 said:
Sorry I don’t have a response but it would be a good idea to blur out your VIN number for security
Thanks for the advice, I didn't notice that.

Phil-8c2p0

Original Poster:

5 posts

114 months

Thursday 7th April 2022
quotequote all
Thanks for the reply's.

My question though, relates to the date. Does that relate to the date of printout, or the date of the test. I am trying to determine whether this is genuinely my report. If that date is the when the check was done, it was 3 months after they rendered my car unusable.

mwstewart

8,610 posts

219 months

Friday 8th April 2022
quotequote all
The test.

Phil-8c2p0

Original Poster:

5 posts

114 months

Friday 8th April 2022
quotequote all
mwstewart said:
The test.
Great. If that's correct, I'm sure that falsifying evidence will go down well with the court hehe

mwstewart

8,610 posts

219 months

Saturday 9th April 2022
quotequote all
Phil-8c2p0 said:
Great. If that's correct, I'm sure that falsifying evidence will go down well with the court hehe
Don't rule out the device having an incorrect local date/time set at the time of the test. The date on the report isn't 100% conclusive.

Phil-8c2p0

Original Poster:

5 posts

114 months

Saturday 9th April 2022
quotequote all
True enough, but they submitted 2 test reports. The first is formatted differently, and has the correct date, in December, the second one, supposedly showing that they had successfully repaired all the faults, is dated after they recieved the court papers in March.

mwstewart

8,610 posts

219 months

Saturday 9th April 2022
quotequote all
Ah, fair enough. There's more to this one smile