RE: Jaguar XJS Celebration | Spotted
RE: Jaguar XJS Celebration | Spotted
Friday 13th May 2022

Jaguar XJS Celebration | Spotted

Friday 13th is meant to be unlucky - not if you're in the mood for an XJS...


The Jaguar XJS. The big old brute with buttresses is not exactly everyone’s cuppa, I know. I know because, if I’m honest, I’m in the ‘everyone’ camp. I’ve always had the XJS pegged as rather frumpy. And lumpy, with those blocks of rubber and slabs of chrome that formed the bumpers, plus the fussy, jarring bits of black plastic trim stuck behind the rear side windows. Inside, it wasn’t much better. Swathes of cheap-looking BL plastic, the ‘70s switches, a trip computer plucked straight out of the Maplin’s catalogue and… what were the drum dials all about? All in all, the XJS had the capacity to make me feel a bit depressed the minute I got behind the wheel. Seriously, it made me glum.

This mood-lowering ability wasn’t made any better by the fact that Jaguar had – and Christ knows how – managed to make sitting in a 4.8-metre-long car feel like going potholing. It was so confined. Yet despite the all-consuming claustrophobia, the XJS managed to spread out like a shipping container on the road. It handled like one, too. The link between the big steering wheel and the front wheels was lost somewhere in the myriad mix of the rubber bushes and over-assisted hydraulics, and it heaved about like a ship in a storm on its slack-Harry suspension. The three-speed auto was bumbling and, somehow, the 5.3-litre HE versions felt slow – in every respect other than draining the tank. A big boot notwithstanding, I struggled to find the positives.

Then Ford wired some engineering budget to Coventry and Geoff Lawson had a crack at restyling it. I liked Lawson. He always came across well and it was a terrible shame he passed away so young, aged just 54. I know his back catalogue isn’t a panacea for sore eyes, but much of the time he was doing his best with the tools he was given, like stretching Mk II lines over a Lincoln platform to meet the expectation for the retro-styled S-Type. But his artistry in turning the angular XJ40 into the utterly sublime X300 was nothing short of genius. He didn’t manage quite the same feat with the XJS, but it was something akin to an ugly-duckling-to-beautiful-swan swing.

From 1991 the rear windows were enlarged, which removed those sharp-edged plastic panels, and the rear lights were tidied away behind a full-width tinted panel. The upgrades inside included a more modern instrument pack with proper dials, dropping the pre-war-look climate control switches and offering some lighter-coloured dashboard trims, which made it feel much airier. All these were pluses but the old-fashioned bumpers remained – until 1993 when they were replaced by one-piece body-coloured plastic bumpers and: ta dah. Twenty-five years after its inception, the XJS was looking modern at last.

I remember carrying out the PDIs on these later models and, instead of sitting in a gloomy storm cloud, they were bright, fresh and attractive, inside and out. The running gear had been upgraded, too. The ‘60s rear subframe, suspension and inboard brakes were revised, the gearboxes had become slicker, four-speed, electronically controlled ZF slushers, the AJ6 had become the more powerful and more efficient AJ16. Oh yes, and the 5.3 V12 had been bored out to a wonderful 6.0-litres. So, all in all, they drove a lot better.

I wrote the other day about how  the original Beetle had gone form woeful to wonderful over the years (in my mind), but that’s just the shift in my attitude. It isn’t the same thing with the XJS. I still think the earlier cars are pretty minging, but the later ones aren’t just better in my head, they’re just better. Full stop.

It would’ve felt like my numbers had come up had I stumbled across one in Ice Blue, which is just a fantastic shade on any Jaguar of the period. In the end I had to settle on this Sapphire Blue car, which is still very handsome, if a little conservative. It works well with the Oatmeal hide, though, which, being a Celebration, has contrasting piping, and the walnut veneer still looks rich, giving the interior its sense of occasion. It looks pretty clean, too, for a car that’s approaching 100,000 miles and its thirtieth birthday, and the fact that those diamond-turned Celebration wheels still shine so brightly is a good sign. They almost certainly would’ve needed resurfacing by now, which means someone’s not skimped on the refurb cost with a coat of silver paint.

So, there we go: a lovely old girl, don’t you think? Or do you think the original XJ-S was the pick of the bunch? In which case, tell me why in the comments below. Happy to be persuaded by enthusiasm.


SPECIFICATION | JAGUAR XJS 4.0 CELEBRATION

Engine: 3,980cc, straight-six
Transmission: 4-speed automatic, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 241@4,700rpm
Torque (lb ft): 281@4,000rpm
MPG: 24
CO2: 277g/km
First registered: 1995
Recorded mileage: 98,000
Price new: N/A 
Yours for: £14,950

See the full ad here

 

 

Author
Discussion

MarvinTPA

Original Poster:

260 posts

160 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
It is, and always was a beautiful thing.

Jim the Sunderer

3,261 posts

213 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
I'm still on the fence about these, another one of those Jaguars with a better looking predecessor and successor.

Mark_Blanchard

1,044 posts

286 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
Glorious looking thing. When I was a kid in the 70s these were as sophisticated as it got, that and a Lotus Esprit.

Leins

10,503 posts

179 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
Jim the Sunderer said:
I'm still on the fence about these, another one of those Jaguars with a better looking predecessor and successor.
I’ll probably get shot down for this, but I prefer the look of the XJS to both the E-Type and the Mk1 XK. The proportions work better for me somehow

Turbobanana

8,546 posts

232 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
I think the original suffered because of the weight of expectation of it being "the new E Type".

Being compared to something that many (not me) consider one of the best-looking cars of all time was always going to be hard. True, the latter S3 V12 Es had done a bit of an Elvis and eaten all the pies, but they still looked kind of sexy: the XJS didn't. The styling was (and is) divisive, simultaneously alienating Jaguar's old-school customers and confusing new ones.

The facelift really helped, and for me the sweet spot would be a 4.0 litre manual, but I fear there's better propositions out there for similar money.

Iamnotkloot

1,919 posts

178 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
It could have been great but that rear overhang is just too much for me. A modern restomod on one of these could work wonders though.

big_rob_sydney

3,671 posts

225 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
Considering what else you can buy for £15k, I can't believe the brass ones to ask that kind of money. There are literally LOADS of other cars I'd look at before this.

Olivera

8,839 posts

270 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
Leins said:
I’ll probably get shot down for this, but I prefer the look of the XJS to both the E-Type and the Mk1 XK. The proportions work better for me somehow
The S1 and S2 E-types were pretty, but the S3 got fatter and all the +2 models are horrendous, especially the S3 +2. The proportions on this all just wrong:


pycraft

1,500 posts

215 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
Leins said:
Jim the Sunderer said:
I'm still on the fence about these, another one of those Jaguars with a better looking predecessor and successor.
I’ll probably get shot down for this, but I prefer the look of the XJS to both the E-Type and the Mk1 XK. The proportions work better for me somehow
I'm with you on the E-type. Looks great from the side, but as standard the fact that the wheels are so far inboard from the front is comical. The Lightweights sorted that out but as standard it looked silly.

Re: the "Mk 1 XK", that would depend on whether you meant the XK120 or XK8...

Turbobanana

8,546 posts

232 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
Iamnotkloot said:
It could have been great but that rear overhang is just too much for me. A modern restomod on one of these could work wonders though.
Can anyone actually explain what the PH aversion to overhangs is all about? It seems to rear its head every time an older car gets featured. To my eyes, anything longer than a Mini or Fiat 500 needs some overhang to avoid looking like this:


Mave

8,217 posts

246 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
Leins said:
Jim the Sunderer said:
I'm still on the fence about these, another one of those Jaguars with a better looking predecessor and successor.
I’ll probably get shot down for this, but I prefer the look of the XJS to both the E-Type and the Mk1 XK. The proportions work better for me somehow
I prefer the early E-type to the early XJS, but i prefer the late XJS to the late E-type

craigjm

21,686 posts

231 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
Leins said:
Jim the Sunderer said:
I'm still on the fence about these, another one of those Jaguars with a better looking predecessor and successor.
I’ll probably get shot down for this, but I prefer the look of the XJS to both the E-Type and the Mk1 XK. The proportions work better for me somehow
I agree entirely and the final facelift of the XJS is the best of all

Matt_T

1,307 posts

105 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
When I was at school my mates dad had a 6.0 V12 - I used to do anything to get taken out to lunch with them just to ride in it. Registration was W3BB... (something)

I always thought that these would be cars that would appreciate and be worth big bucks by now... but it never realyy happened and I guess it never will.

There was a pale blue manual one at the Black Swan Ockham cars & coffee last weekend... looked lovely - someone on here?

anonymous-user

85 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
The facelift XJRS was the best looking model for me - integrated body coloured bumpers but without the old man chrome and naff "golf club" pinstripe, and with a much improved stance it looked much more the modern powerful GT and less Nigel's carriage to the Rotary Club. TWR/JaguarSport also sorted out the suspension too, it drove like no other XJS.



Browsing XJS pics that pinstripe really does make it look like an old farts car, the ones that have been repainted and not had it put back look miles better.

£15k for a not particularly low mileage 4.0 is too high, you regularly see proper 6 litre ones for that. Even in this stupid market I'd call that an £8k - £10k car, my old XJRS with that sort of mileage just went through auction and closed at £11k or so and that's a far more special thing than this. These have been waiting for their "E-Type" moment for values for 20 years and counting now and it's not happening.

Edited by anonymous-user on Friday 13th May 12:01

wpa1975

14,842 posts

145 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
I prefer the earlier XJS or a later sport plus seems overpriced to me.

Matt_T

1,307 posts

105 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
Stickleback 123 - is the 4.0 more desirable as the engine is more reliable and easier to work on than the V12?

craigjm

21,686 posts

231 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
Matt_T said:
I always thought that these would be cars that would appreciate and be worth big bucks by now... but it never realyy happened and I guess it never will.
They are starting to rise. You will pay 30k plus for the best ones. The XJ coupe has only just started to rise really and this is now following

Mark-C

7,738 posts

236 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
craigjm said:
Matt_T said:
I always thought that these would be cars that would appreciate and be worth big bucks by now... but it never realyy happened and I guess it never will.
They are starting to rise. You will pay 30k plus for the best ones. The XJ coupe has only just started to rise really and this is now following
Mine is an early facelift (chrome bumpered) 4.0 litre that I've owned for 12 years during which it's shown little inclination to rise in value.

It's my daily, lives on the street and is getting a bit scruffy though!

BigChiefmuffinAgain

1,788 posts

129 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
If it was good enough for Mike Gambit, it would be good enough for me.... ( though I think he drove the original, not the facelift ? )

McRors

468 posts

87 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
I often wonder why some car designs age well and others badly - Ford Sierra badly, VW Corrado well. The XJS is definitely in the latter camp and IMHO is a design classic. I think it was Steve Cropley (Autocar) who saw an uncovered mock up of the car by accident but didn't write about it as he couldn't believe it would ever make production. How things change.