RE: Alpine A110 GT vs. BBR MX-5 Super 220
RE: Alpine A110 GT vs. BBR MX-5 Super 220
Sunday 12th June 2022

Alpine A110 GT vs. BBR MX-5 Super 220

Small, mighty and marvellous come together 


In a world of AMG hybrids knocking on for 2.5 tonnes, M4 cabrios worryingly close to 2,000kg and plug-in Range Rovers well beyond either, seeing 2,164kg quoted for a fast car is nothing out of the ordinary. Cars are larger, safer, and more complicated than ever, with none of those attributes exactly conducive to trimming the kilos. Which makes 2,164kg as the combined kerbweight for two new cars even more remarkable - and that’s exactly what we have here.  

Both Mazda MX-5 (1,045kg) and Alpine A110 (1,119kg) are often talked about in isolation as exemplars of lightweight innovation, yet seldom paired together. They aren’t conventional rivals, really, given the gulf in asking prices, but as celebrations of what can be achieved without much mass at all we could think of none better. Much more habitable than the true sub-tonne lightweights yet hundreds of precious kilos lighter than ordinary sports cars, they show off perfectly what can be gained - in terms of ride, handling, efficiency and much more - by not adding much at all. It’s worth mentioning, too, that they are representative kerbweights without a driver, not ones that require careful massaging through expensive options ticks or outright fantasy. Like weighing a car without any vital fluids in. They’re just light - and fantastic. 

Specifically, the cars here are a 2019 Mazda MX-5 30th Anniversary Edition, uprated with BBR’s excellent Super 220 kit, and the very latest Alpine A110 GT, all 300hp and £60,000 of it. Even given their respective perches in the sports car hierarchy, this isn’t an eyeline match up - ideally there’d be an A110 S to take on the racier MX-5, or perhaps a Life110 Alpine to continue the modified theme - but there is more than enough common to both to make it interesting.  

Not least because the Alpine remains so compelling out of the box that many wouldn't change a thing. While it’s become clear that a few tweaks further improve the package, there’s little out there at twice the price that so instantly reminds you what a joy driving can actually be. Crucially, much of that entertainment remains attributable to its diminutive size and weight: roads are wider, gaps are larger, the ride is cushier, and the world (or Britain’s network of B-roads) feels your oyster in something that seems the polar opposite of a broad shouldered, stiffly sprung sports car. Small, nimble and agile opens up so many more opportunities. 

This latest GT feels better than ever; more power might seem counterintuitive to the Alpine ideal, but 300hp and 1,100kg isn’t half exciting. It can easily be forgotten in all the (justified) gushing about how an A110 steers, rides and stops, but it really is a very fast car: 0-62mph in 4.2 seconds matches a manual 911 Carrera S - and that only tells part of the story. Even allowing for some lag from a 1.8-litre turbo churning out almost 170hp per litre, the A110 soon flies along like a leaf caught in the breeze, accruing speed with seemingly no effort at all. In fact, nothing the Alpine does well feels even remotely taxing. Perhaps when really pushed the relative softness of the chassis finally gets the better of the A110, although, honestly, if that’s the payoff for such an amenable, agreeable, comfortable sports car the rest of the time, then we'll take it. And you know that such suppleness and control (in everything but the most extreme circumstances) simply wouldn’t be possible with a heavier car.  

That a car half the weight of a Bentley can be such a lovely object also counts in the A110’s favour. It feels impossibly French in this respect, covered in leather like a Chanel football boot. But it works. If the drive proves that sportiness doesn’t have to mean crazy stiffness, then the interior reminds you that luxury isn’t the same as excess. It’s a very neat trick; opulence and true driving fun tend to be mutually exclusive traits, even when spending a lot, so to find them so closely aligned only deepens the affection one feels for the car's singular, mini-GT charm offensive. 

You probably don’t need telling that an MX-5 isn’t luxurious, opulent or refined; not in standard trim, and most certainly not after BBR has had its way with one. It’s a sports car like they used to be: small, loud, raucous and obscenely entertaining to drive fast. What’s interesting to note flitting from A110 to Mazda, however, is how much Alpine has packed into just a few more kilos and millimetres. Courtesy of its much more sophisticated construction, it feels so much more mature, and cleverly subdued. Provided both passengers could pack (very) light, you’d think nothing of driving to Europe in an A110, with even taller folk comfy behind the wheel. The MX-5, with its driving position best suited to jockeys and endlessly buzzy motorway manners, would certainly require more effort. The French car officially weighs just 64kg more than convertible (and that 1,119kg figure is the lightest kerbweight), yet it's ability to isolate you from the road is on another level entirely. 

Of course, that's partly because the MX-5 isn't really concerned with isolating you from very much at all; it only knows how to do lightweight thrills the traditional way. The A110 will almost coax itself round corners; the MX-5 wants you involved on a blustery, gut level. In that sense, it is the ideal riposte to the cultured, can-do style of the slimline GT. Especially if you've had the foresight to deliver your BBR, and had them extract a very vocal 224hp. 

Because however rowdy it might be at a cruise, it’s more than liveable, and the pay-off on a good road is more than worth it. We’ve said it before, and we’ll say it again: there really might not be anything more gratifying than a good MX-5 when the conditions suit. Not if the other car weighs 75kg more or 750kg more. All the advantages the A110 earns from its small size are here, present and correct, only with a healthy dollop of attitude on top.  

It says something that breathed-on Mazda makes you reflect on what a shame it is that Caterham couldn’t continue with their side of the A110 project. In the same way that BBR brings the best from an MX-5 - an engine that revs quicker, goes harder and sounds better, crisper steering and tighter suspension - without tarnishing its innate appeal, so might Caterham’s 110 have delivered a unique take on the Alpine formula. With a manual gearbox, too. It’s given both Renault and the aftermarket scope to expand their offering (and very well they’ve done, too), though it remains hard not to imagine what might have been. 

Like the A110, the MX-5 is a simple car, and all the better for it. There’s a Sport mode in the Alpine that does nothing to the suspension or steering, and the Mazda dispenses even with that small frill. Both prove how superfluous such add-ons are if the base product is properly sorted. Never do you wish for more steering weight or suspension stiffness, or a different brake pedal feel in either, because they’ve been setup just so already. Configurability can be great, sure - but it's no substitute for doing the job properly in the first place. 

The BBR in particular feels how you imagined a sports car would be before you could actually drive one. The 2.0-litre engine thrives on revs, really giving its best beyond 6,000rpm and screaming all the way to 8,000rpm - much in the way we always hoped an MX-5 would. The six-speed manual is a dream, too, perfectly weighted and with exploitable ratios, while the upgraded Wilwood brakes make it the easiest car in the world to heel and toe.   

But it's the incisiveness and superior control offered by the switched out springs which really ties the package together. The Super 220 is more responsive at the front end and more throttle steerable at the back. Even allowing for a tiny bit of trademark MX-5 wobble and steering that’s still a tad light, the orange car is an unmitigated joy on a country road. ‘A Caterham with CarPlay’ is one of the notes from the day, which usefully summarises its ability to blend 1,000kg and 8,000rpm with everyday usability. In fact, there wouldn't be one day that goes by where it wouldn’t feel like money very well spent indeed.

That’s probably the key takeaway from both Alpine and BBR MX-5 - the longer you spend with them, the more impressive they seem. Each grabs you straightaway with the virtues of lightweight construction, making so many other fast cars seem gratuitously lardy, but it is not the limit of their appeal. Far from being flaky, insubstantial offerings, they’re sports cars of real integrity and sophistication - while never losing sight of what makes 1,100kg cars so great. It’s a wonder, really, that more in this mould haven’t been attempted, particularly given the renewed focus on efficiency and waste, though perhaps the scarcity goes to show how difficult the task is. 

Regardless, there seemed no better time, with a 1,625kg BMW CSL and 1,500kg Lotus sports car out there, to show just what can be done with a tonne or so. Both use less fuel, take up less space and place less stress on their components than the heavier stuff, yet never fail to deliver as driver’s cars. You might even argue they over deliver, on the basis that the BBR adds a serrated edge to the MX-5's occasionally dull charm, and 300hp really does provide the suave GT with a shot in the arm. The pair are ultimately well separated by cost and remit, but rest assured both are still brilliant - as you may have heard once or twice already - and anyone disillusioned with increasingly bloated kerbweights could do an awful lot worse than spending their sports car money with either Alpine or Mazda. Light has never felt so right.  


SPECIFICATION | 2022 ALPINE A110 GT

Engine: 1,798cc, 4-cyl turbocharged
Transmission: 7-speed dual-clutch auto, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 300@6,300rpm
Torque (lb ft): 251@2,400-6,000rpm
0-62mph: 4.2secs
Top speed: 155mph 
Weight: 1,119kg (minimum kerbweight)
MPG: 41.5-42.2 (WLTP)
CO2: 153-160g/km
Price: £59,355 (price as tested £62,867)

SPECIFICATION | MAZDA MX-5 BBR SUPER 220

Engine: 1,998cc, 4-cyl
Transmission: 6-speed manual, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 224@7,800rpm (standard car 187hp@7,300rpm, on BBR dyno with 99-octane)
Torque (lb ft): 166@4,350rpm (standard car 154@4,850rpm, on BBR dyno with 99-octane)
0-62mph: 6.0sec (estimate, standard car 6.5sec)
Top speed: 136mph (standard car)
Weight: 1,105kg (with 75kg driver)
MPG: 40.9 (standard)
CO2: 156g/km (standard)
Price: £30,360 (brand new MX-5 2.0 Sport Tech. BBR Super 220 from £2,682 inc VAT)

Image credit | Harry Rudd

 

 

Author
Discussion

georgeyboy12345

Original Poster:

4,649 posts

66 months

Saturday 11th June 2022
quotequote all
Both fantastic cars and unfortunately too rare today. I’d take the normally aspirated, manual MX-5 at almost half the price of the Alpine.

monkeymark

70 posts

170 months

Saturday 11th June 2022
quotequote all
Well written article. I am a light weight sports car fanatic. I own an Ariel Atom. (9+ years). Have been looking for a car with similar FUN traits with more creature comforts…
I love the whole MX-5 package and have test driven the last 2 generations and their mid life facelifts but they have fallen short in 1-2 big ways:
The ND4.1+2 versions although fun have NO steering feel at all and as mentioned the steering is light. So on a fun B road you never feel fully part of the fun.
2- Even for somebody who is on the shorter side and can fit into anything comfortably such as an Elise, the MX5 is incredibly cramped,lacking in storage with a fairly small boot.
3- Lots and lots of road noise. Better with roof down. But not ideal to do if raining+++ or on a long Euro trip.
The last 2 points are minor and go with the small, light ethos but the first is a biggie. Yes, blame the electric steering but others do it better now.
Not to mention the price has really risen these past few years, like all cars, but other cars provide more for the money as an overall package. Very few of those others,admittedly, can you drop the roof on though!
It’s a near miss for me although not driven BBR version.

GreatScott2016

2,576 posts

119 months

Saturday 11th June 2022
quotequote all
On looks alone, I’d take the MX-5 every time. The Alpine is just such an odd looking thing, actually saw one drive through our village yesterday and that only reinforced my view. Both fun behind the wheel though and that’s a top priority for many driving

Venisonpie

4,909 posts

113 months

Saturday 11th June 2022
quotequote all
Both fabulous and the complete antithesis to fat metal, modern day Lotus's. Not many people see lightweight as important hence they'll remain niche but maybe all the better for it. My type.

Minimarvel

7 posts

128 months

Saturday 11th June 2022
quotequote all
It is hard to tell, but I think the author likes these. And so do I, I’d have them both (not in orange) in my lottery win garage.

Glenn63

3,966 posts

115 months

Saturday 11th June 2022
quotequote all
I actually really like the look of the mx5 especially in orange. Unfortunately 2 seat cars are useless to me.

bennno

15,295 posts

300 months

Saturday 11th June 2022
quotequote all

Gr86 in this test would have been interesting......

Iamnotkloot

1,917 posts

178 months

Saturday 11th June 2022
quotequote all
Yep, two PH heroes there, and on the same front page news that Porsche have sold a million Cayennes. There’s a message in there somewhere, and it’s not good news for the lightweights. With increased focus on emissions, including brake dust and rubber particles, maybe we’ll get back to lighter cars? Nah

cib24

1,127 posts

184 months

Saturday 11th June 2022
quotequote all
What a cool and fun article to read on a Saturday morning.

The MX-5 is cool but I can’t fit.

I’ve sat in an Alpine and was very impressed except for the infotainment and gauge cluster. Having said that, a used Legende around £40k with Life 110 upgrades, an exhaust and a Litchfield remap would make it pretty epic for B road or grand touring duties, all while getting 45mpg on a run.

coppice

9,750 posts

175 months

Saturday 11th June 2022
quotequote all
MX5 driving position 'suitable for jockeys' ? I'm 5-11 , not slim and I've done many 300 plus days in mine without discomfort. Endlessly buzzy ? Crap steering ? Yup - typical EPAS . no feedback and even self centring seems to much of an effort . But that apart , I hugely enjoy mine . If I didn't like droptops so much it'd be the Alpine though - fast , gorgeous , successful evocation of original , light and desirable

jhonn

1,707 posts

180 months

Saturday 11th June 2022
quotequote all
^^^ Yep, I'm just over 6ft and fit comfortably in mine. Not much I'd change about it to be honest.

Black S2K

1,940 posts

280 months

Saturday 11th June 2022
quotequote all
cib24 said:
What a cool and fun article to read on a Saturday morning.

...
Seconded.

TristPerrin

148 posts

209 months

Saturday 11th June 2022
quotequote all
Had my ND a year from new now and I still love it. I recently got the dealer fit 30mm Eibach lowerings springs and a decent alignment (see Flyin' Miatas recommened numbers) and it's gotten even better!

Once the warranty is up I will definitely be getting the super 220 fitted to her too... Unless someone has developed a supercharger kit for the ND2 by then biggrin

horsemeatscandal

2,280 posts

135 months

Saturday 11th June 2022
quotequote all
At first, you do sometimes feel like the seating position in the Mazda is too high. But when you're getting out of the car or when you look at it with the door open, it really is hard to figure out how they could have got your arse any closer to the tarmac.

For my interest, I hope this article generates some discussion on the efficacy and quality of BBR's work.

Bobby Lee

308 posts

86 months

Saturday 11th June 2022
quotequote all
monkeymark said:
2- Even for somebody who is on the shorter side and can fit into anything comfortably such as an Elise, the MX5 is incredibly cramped,lacking in storage with a fairly small boot.
You’re kidding man… this rubbish again? And from someone who has had an atom I’d expect better. I’m 6 foot 2 and my mate is 120kg and we’ve been all over the country and on holiday with luggage in an MX5 no issue! The boot gets two full soft kit bags in. Jog on.

cerb4.5lee

45,086 posts

211 months

Saturday 11th June 2022
quotequote all
I'm not usually a fan of cars with small engines(I can't see past the engine in the Yaris GR for example), but I'd happily have either one of these in my garage I reckon. I love their lighter weight ethos, and that was something that I appreciated when I had the Cerbera too.

cerb4.5lee

45,086 posts

211 months

Saturday 11th June 2022
quotequote all
Glenn63 said:
I actually really like the look of the mx5 especially in orange. Unfortunately 2 seat cars are useless to me.
I have my missus and 2 kids...and that still doesn't stop me having a 2 seater! I personally think that 2 seater cars have a nice specialness about them to sit in/drive.

TrotCanterGallopCharge

435 posts

121 months

Saturday 11th June 2022
quotequote all
Bobby Lee said:
monkeymark said:
2- Even for somebody who is on the shorter side and can fit into anything comfortably such as an Elise, the MX5 is incredibly cramped,lacking in storage with a fairly small boot.
You’re kidding man… this rubbish again? And from someone who has had an atom I’d expect better. I’m 6 foot 2 and my mate is 120kg and we’ve been all over the country and on holiday with luggage in an MX5 no issue! The boot gets two full soft kit bags in. Jog on.
Was your touring in the ND version? I ask as I'm 6ft 3", when I got into a ND, my head hit the roof, but in an NC, I got in Ok. Whilst they look similar, didn't Mazda change dimensions around a bit between models? I don't know if this incl luggage space as well?

C.MW

491 posts

100 months

Saturday 11th June 2022
quotequote all
The very best sports cars out there now. And that's with prices as well as certain L and P cars taken into account.

Edited by C.MW on Saturday 11th June 13:44

cib24

1,127 posts

184 months

Saturday 11th June 2022
quotequote all
TrotCanterGallopCharge said:
Was your touring in the ND version? I ask as I'm 6ft 3", when I got into a ND, my head hit the roof, but in an NC, I got in Ok. Whilst they look similar, didn't Mazda change dimensions around a bit between models? I don't know if this incl luggage space as well?
I’m also 6’3” and could barely get the roof on in the convertible ND but my hair was touching it, and in the RF I couldn’t close it. I’d need a bucket seat to sit lower in the car but then I couldn’t stretch out my legs enough either.

In the Alpine it felt like I could be 6’6” and still fit.