Ford Puma | Shed of the Week
The Puma was a vanishing breed when new. Now, more than 20 years on from launch, it's downright exceptional
Wikipedia defines Pumas as ‘large, secretive cats’. As far as Shed is aware, all cats are secretive, insofar as they can’t actually communicate in any meaningful or useful manner.
Of course, there is more than one type of communication. In the motoring world we talk about a car’s ability to communicate with its driver, and in that regard Ford’s Puma had the beating of any hairy moggy you care to name, from large and secretive to small and gobby.
The first Pumas joined the Ford New Edge range in late 1997. Based on the Fiesta, they came with three engines. Well, they didn’t come with three engines, although if they had that would have been quite something. There was a range of three engines: a 90hp 1.4, a 101hp 1.6, and a variable cam timed 123hp 1.7 unit co-developed by Ford and Yamaha. This was only used in the Puma and was the most desirable choice
Happily, the ad puts our shed down as a 1.7. Less happily, Shed’s inquiries appear to show it actually has the more proletarian 1.6 engine that was used for two years in 2000 and 2001 models. Although this unit had to be caned somewhat to achieve a (high) nine-second 0-60mph time, it didn’t have the 1.7’s sometimes troublesome Nikasil bore liners and its cambelt changes were easier to handle. They didn’t come round quite as often either (10yrs/100k miles as opposed to 5yrs/80k on the 1.7s).
We’re told that our shed’s belt was done at 63,000 miles, which looking at the MOT history would have been sometime in 2012 when it was 11 years old, so not far off the schedule. Plus, irrespective of the engine, you always had the joy of great Puma handling. With well-judged suspension settings and only a tonne or so to carry the Ian Callum-designed Puma was, and still is today, a brilliant drive.
All Pumas were built in Cologne, but rust prevention wasn’t high on the agenda back then. The rust that mercilessly attacks these cars in the rear arches, door edges and sills means that Pumas rarely come up for consideration by Shed. In fact it’s been nearly five years since we last had one in here. That was a very clean, one-lady-owner Melina Blue 1.7 from 1998 with 75,000 miles and a full service history. Plenty of important consumables – cambelt, exhaust system, tyres, brakes – had been replaced in the year leading up to the 2017 PH ad, when it had a nearly new (and clean) MOT.
The price for all that Puma goodness in 2017? £650. Eeeh, them were the days. That blue 1.7 is still going strong in 2022 too. It has a clean current MOT, its rust issues having been sorted out in 2019. The low miles accumulated since 2017 suggest that the current owner is hoping to make a killing at some point in the future by applying the popular principle that any Ford will eventually be worth something if you wait long enough. He’s not alone in that either. A well-known ‘vehicles remaining’ website tells us that, although the number of Puma 1.7s has gone down year on year from 30,000 in 2011 to 1,800 in 2021, the number of 1.7s still registered in the UK but taken off the road for safe keeping has gone up year on year from 1,800 in 2011 to 3,800 in 2021.
Annoyingly, that website doesn’t give us any numbers for the 1.6, but it does tell us that there are only 140 or so 1.4s remaining, down from 3,100 ten years ago, so the figures for the 1.6 are not going to be huge. Pumas were only ever sold in Europe, and the production run only ran for four years. This particular example could be a decent one to ‘lay down’, if that’s the way you’re thinking, with its low 91,000 mileage and evidence of de-rusting work carried out in 2012, 2013, 2017 and 2019. You’d like to hope that in each case some decent rust prevention was slapped on.
What might go amiss? Failing thermostats, coil packs and oxygen sensors. Rusty earth straps causing electrical problems. Leaky core plugs. Dodgy heater fans and control valves. Sticking windows. Water coming into the cabin either through the bulkhead wiring grommet or from a detached aircon drain pipe. Dying tailgate struts. Wonky parcel shelves. Melting steering wheel rims. Mis-aligned tracking. Here’s something that went very right though: Ford’s telly ad for the Puma, featuring Steve McQueen. A classic of the genre, a bit like the Puma itself you might say. Buy now while stocks last.
I had a fairly poor example of a 1.7 for a year, until it failed it's MOT badly. I bought the wrong one, but it was still an absolute blast for 12 months. I honestly think the handling was up there with my current mk7 ST. In some respects better as the front end wasn't corrupted by torque.
A good 1.7 would make a fantastic base for a track car, and something different to all the Clio's. Always wanted to have a go in an FRP, but the market for those bolted a while back!
Tidy looking motor, but I'll pass thanks.
Can sort of see the appeal but I think these are perhaps a little over eulogised, I think I would end up buying it and finding it slow and old more rather than the much vaunted handling came through, its very easy to view cars like this based on your impression back then forgetting that we have become spoilt and fussy in the meantime gorging on 300 bhp hatchbacks and whatever, though if its that good, I am sure it will still be delightful.
Would rather spend a smidge more and get one in a better colour with the 1.7 engine, or a Racing one, now they did look pretty good.
Anyway, even as a bit of a Ford fan, have to say Vauxhall nailed small coupe first with the Tigra and Ford nicked the idea (Like Merc CLS and VW with the Passat CC) I know it wasn't anywhere near as good as these, and despite the fact its largely forgotten and a bit derided it did cause a sensation back in 1994. Easy to look back and see the last sad few Tigras dragging their sorry carcasses round, usually badly modified and driven by halfwits but they were very desirable back in 1994 to say 2000. Remember going to the NEC motor shown and seeing one in "Apache Orange" (Wonder if they could use that name now ?) and it looked stunning, Vauxhall were doing really well back then with the Frontera, Calibra, Corsa and Cavalier. My wife nearly bought one but we ended up with a Mk3 Golf instead.
I sold it because with me in the driving seat there was no legroom for my daughter behind. Don't miss it in the slightest.
So much for journalists' hype eh?
We can lose him open A roads but on tight, twisty bumpy B roads he’s right up there. And, most importantly with a massive grin on his face.
These are very fun cars perfectly suited to UK roads. Those talking of lowering and bigger wheels please don’t as you would ruin the main benefit. Unless you are a track god.
Forums | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff