RE: Lotus 340R | Spotted
RE: Lotus 340R | Spotted
Monday 15th August 2022

Lotus 340R | Spotted

Got your heart set on a Series 1 Exige? This might change your mind...


When was the last time Lotus made something truly wild? You could argue it was the F1-inspired T125, but it could only be driven on the track and only a handful of people actually bought one. Perhaps it was the homologation special Evora GTE that opened Lotus up to a world of GT3 and GTE racing. For sure, but nothing this side of the millennium has been anywhere near as barmy as the 340R.

Okay, we’ll get the obligatory Colin Chapman reference in nice and early. We all know the Lotus recipe is to “simplify, then add lightness”, but the 340R took that adage and pushed it to the absolute limit. At just 675kg the 340R took 50kg from the already svelte 725kg Series 1 Elise, and was only a tad heavier than a Formula 1 car of the era. Remarkable, really, seeing as though the only carbon bits on the 340R were ultimately decorative.

Speaking of styling, there wasn’t a whole lot of car for chief designer Russell Carr to work with. The starting point was the Elise’s ingenious aluminium chassis, around which were fibreglass-reinforced body panels that did the job of keeping weight to a minimum without chasing costly exotic materials. And yet, with such a tiny canvas to work on, Carr penned a design that’s just as striking today as it was when it first appeared in concept form 24 years ago. The swoopy look with an F1-style front wing and rear spoiler fixed on aluminium struts meant the 340R looked every bit the mix of B-road star and track weapon that it was. Divisive at the time and distinctly an early-2000s design, but a 340R is always guaranteed to draw a crowd wherever it goes.

Of course, looks are nothing without performance and, to little surprise, the 340R emphatically delivered. The 1.8-litre Rover K Series engine only mustered 180hp, and that’s accessed right at the top of the rev range, but its ultra-lightweight nature resulted in a power-to-weight ratio of 266hp per tonne. Not quite as high as the 340hp per tonne as originally planned, but still enough to muster an impressive 0-62mph time of 4.4 seconds. Besides, the 340R came alive in the bends. Couple its featherweight chassis with a close-ratio five-speed ‘box and bespoke Yokohama tyres and the 340R left supercar owners in the early 21st century bemused at just how fast the little Lotus was.

Given that Lotus missed its rather ambitious power-to-weight target with this car, 340 examples were built to give the name some meaning. And while some journalists were dismissive of it at the time - suggesting not unreasonably that the £35,000 price tag was on the high side for a car with no doors - all were snapped up before hitting the showrooms. Naturally, a fair chunk of those have lived most of their lives on track, so it’s rare when a bog standard one comes along in mint condition – a bit like this 340R.

Not only has it been with the same owner for the past 20 years, but it’s covered just 2,000 miles since it was registered in 2000. A little-known fact about the 340R is that a select few were released with carbon fibre wheel arches, which this car is fitted with. Impressive, as many chose to go down the fibreglass route to make for cheaper damage repairs. Now, a highly original, limited-run sports car this spectacular has never come cheap, and the 340R is no exception. The ad’s asking for £67,995, which, honestly, isn’t far off the cost of a very tidy Series 1 Exige or a newer V6. Both fantastic cars, sure, but nowhere near as radical – or as rare – as the oddball 340R.


SPECIFICATION | LOTUS 340R

Engine: 1,796cc in-line four
Transmission: five-speed manual, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 180@7,800rpm
Torque (lb ft): 126@5,000rpm
MPG: N/A
CO2: N/A
Year registered: 2000
Recorded mileage: 2,000
Price new: £35,000
Yours for: £67,995

See the original advert here

Author
Discussion

sege

Original Poster:

604 posts

253 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
I wonder, what car has the most detailed and clear steering and chassis feedback of all time, this, or a 2-eleven? I've read contradictory reports, and will probably never get to drive either, so will never know.

What a thing.

SpudLink

8,269 posts

223 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
I had an Elise at the time this was released, so was a bit obsessed with the 340R as the ‘ultimate’ version of the concept. I first saw one parked at the Nurburgring in about 2001 and was disappointed in how it looked in the flesh.
I think the 2-11 is the more successful car in most ways.

Anyway, here’s one spotted in a petrol station in 2018…

(We were both topping up the tank for a Lotus on Track event, so not an entirely random spot.)

Drinksleeprepeat

170 posts

78 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
I’ve own both and have to say the 340r was the nicer car to drive on the road,( the windscreen helped!) but the 211 was the better track car and easier to handle at the limit.

It’s a shame this one didn’t have the what I would say was the mandatory 190 power upgrade as it made the car much more drivable but then again considering the mileage it was not bought to be driven.

Edited by Drinksleeprepeat on Monday 15th August 06:15


Edited by Drinksleeprepeat on Monday 15th August 06:17

Drinksleeprepeat

170 posts

78 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
SpudLink said:
I had an Elise at the time this was released, so was a bit obsessed with the 340R as the ‘ultimate’ version of the concept. I first saw one parked at the Nurburgring in about 2001 and was disappointed in how it looked in the flesh.
I think the 2-11 is the more successful car in most ways.

Anyway, here’s one spotted in a petrol station in 2018…

(We were both topping up the tank for a Lotus on Track event, so not an entirely random spot.)
I was the total opposite regarding the looks. Went to the Lotus dealer to by an Exige MK1 and they had a 340R in the showroom, fell in love with it and ordered one.

Corkys

305 posts

232 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
I love these. But they must have the titanium exhaust.

mrclav

1,645 posts

254 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
This or an Ariel Atom...?

Tickle

6,510 posts

235 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
mrclav said:
This or an Ariel Atom...?
Depends which one. A back to back test of an early Atom and 340R would be a good test of how they drive seeing as they share the Rover K Series.

LotusOmega375D

9,409 posts

184 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
Why doesn’t the opening sentence mention the 2-11, 3-11 and even the Evija as other wild cars developed by Lotus since the turn of the millennium?

big_rob_sydney

3,671 posts

225 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
I'd rather have a sportsbike.

Maccmike8

1,612 posts

85 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
Fantastic.
I have a soft spot for the 2-Eleven.

thelostboy

4,700 posts

256 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
Love the look of both 340R and 2-Eleven, but perhaps ironically put off during my time in Lotus Cup UK by the 2-Elevens always blowing up.

They were also just not as quick as a well setup Exige S1 so imagine a 340R would be an absolute weapon. Just done a search and supposedly the 2-Eleven is lighter, which is hard to believe.

Early Atoms were overrated - engine far back and high CoG.


LPH

428 posts

204 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
I had one for a number of years. Along side an SC Honda converted S2 Elise.

The S2 was much faster (to the point of being scary) but the 340R was much more fun to drive. Handling and ride were superb and the 190hp was just right for road use.

I was grey when I got it but decided that was too boring a colour for such a mad car - so also went green.







Sion111R

424 posts

123 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
[quote=LPH]I had one for a number of years. Along side an SC Honda converted S2 Elise.

That Sir looks like garage perfection!

HeMightBeBanned

630 posts

209 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
LPH said:
I had one for a number of years. Along side an SC Honda converted S2 Elise.

The S2 was much faster (to the point of being scary) but the 340R was much more fun to drive. Handling and ride were superb and the 190hp was just right for road use.

I was grey when I got it but decided that was too boring a colour for such a mad car - so also went green.





Who cut the bodywork on your 340R, and was the cut properly cleaned up? I've seen some dreadful bodywork cuts on 340Rs. I know it makes them more manageable when major servicing is required, but it seems like herecy.

Arsecati

2,789 posts

148 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
I absolutely love Lotus', always have ever since I was a kid (even had the official Esprit model car from James Bond...... which I effectively killed like every other boy did at the time, by playing with it in the bath!!). But............ I really don't think this is a very good looking car: not for me at all. :/


Nix P

10 posts

76 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all


This was mine, I purchased it new in 2000, pictured along with my Esprit S2 that I’d owned since 1982. The 340r was number 031, therefore it had the CF wings, these were only available on the first 50 cars. Out of the many Lotuses I’ve owned over the years the 340r was the best and I miss it very much.
Last I’d heard was it had the Honda engine conversion and was later written off.

Nick


WCZ

11,563 posts

225 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
my dad had one of these and made a life long friend with another 340r owner at a track day, concidentially it's my dad's friends funeral today


Drinksleeprepeat

170 posts

78 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
HeMightBeBanned said:
LPH said:
I had one for a number of years. Along side an SC Honda converted S2 Elise.

The S2 was much faster (to the point of being scary) but the 340R was much more fun to drive. Handling and ride were superb and the 190hp was just right for road use.

I was grey when I got it but decided that was too boring a colour for such a mad car - so also went green.





Who cut the bodywork on your 340R, and was the cut properly cleaned up? I've seen some dreadful bodywork cuts on 340Rs. I know it makes them more manageable when major servicing is required, but it seems like herecy.
Seems like heresy I know but when you have to take off the body to replace the battery you can understand why people do it.

LPH

428 posts

204 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
^^^^

I thought long and hard about doing it but decided it was best if you wanted to maintain the car properly - especially engine work and cambelt changes. They become so much easier.

Very simple to glass it back together and repaint it so totally reversible. The quality of the GRP on the bodies was awful, very thin and rippled in places.

LPH

428 posts

204 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
Sion111R]PH said:
I had one for a number of years. Along side an SC Honda converted S2 Elise.

That Sir looks like garage perfection!
Don't have either anymore.

Went for something else green and silver(ish)....;)





Do still miss the 340R sometimes though. I was such an occasion to drive.

Looks like it's still alive - still taxed and MOT'd.





Edited by LPH on Monday 15th August 14:00