RE: Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6 | Spotted
RE: Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6 | Spotted
Thursday 25th August 2022

Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6 | Spotted

Can 335hp and comparative rarity tempt you into a Crossfire?


To say the Chrysler Crossfire launched to mixed reviews would be an almighty understatement. Most journalists criticised its lifeless steering, harsh ride and dodgy interior quality. Accordingly, it built up a reputation for being rubbish and, partly as a result, didn’t sell all that well. It also didn’t help that Clarkson said its arched back looked a bit like a dog parking its breakfast.

A shame, really, because on paper it has some interesting ingredients. As Chrysler had been acquired by Daimler in the late 1990s, it was decided that the Karmann-built Mercedes-Benz SLK would serve as the underpinnings of the Crossfire. Chrysler, meanwhile, was free to sprinkle on some American flair by designing the interior and exterior of the car. The result was a two-seat sports car with a V6 sourced from its sibling that, from certain angles at least, looked pretty stylish. 

In isolation, the Crossfire was likely not as bad as Top Gear made it out to be and some contemporary reviews are a little kinder on the sports coupe. But, ultimately, BMW was doing a better job with the Z4 and Nissan nailed the affordable performance coupe formula with the 350Z. Of course, Chrysler didn’t take the Crossfire’s lukewarm reception lying down, striking back with the faster, more focused and much more aggressive SRT-6.

Firstly, power took a monumental leap from 218hp to 335hp thanks to Mercedes’ M112 supercharged 3.2-litre V6, lowering the Crossfire’s 0-62mph from 6.9 seconds to a flat five. The suspension was also reworked, comprising retuned dampers and firmer springs to sharpen things up. The brakes were beefed up too, while the ESP was adjusted to allow for a little more slip at the rear wheels. Granted, the default five-speed auto goes to show that the Crossfire was still more tourer than tearaway, even in SRT-6 guise. That, and the American market wasn’t nearly as keen on manuals as it is today.

It looked the part, at least. New bumpers and skirts gave the SRT-6 a bit of an edge, as did the small tail spoiler which, arguably, does a good job of sorting out the divisive rear end. The interior was given a makeover as well, with the seats trimmed in leather and suede to emphasise its sports cruiser nature. SRT-6 models also gained a flat-bottom steering wheel (for better or worse, depending where you sit on that one) with perforated leather grips in case you really wanted to put it through its paces.

The result? The SRT-6 was considered a more playful car than the standard model and, though not transformative, the stiffer setup did a good job of ironing out some of the Crossfire’s lazier traits. But with the base Crossfire being far from popular in the UK, the SRT-6 sold here in extremely limited numbers. HowManyLeft puts the number at a peak of 111 in 2008, with only 49 registered on the road today. That makes them pretty rare, making this example worthy of the spotlight. 

You get the sense this 2006 car has been well looked after; not just because it was owned by the former president of the British Chrysler Crossfire owners’ club, but also because the interior looks immaculate, the wheels have recently undergone a full refurb and there doesn’t appear to be any signs of surface rust, which can be an issue for some Crossfire owners. All for £13,950, which seems fairly reasonable for what is likely one of the cleanest examples out there. It may have its quirks, but that’s a quite a lot of power for not a lot of money.  


SPECIFICATION | CHRYSLER CROSSFIRE SRT-6

Engine: 3,199cc V6, supercharged
Transmission: five-speed automatic, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 335@6,100rpm
Torque (lb ft): 310@3,500rpm
MPG: N/A
CO2: N/A
Year registered: 2006
Recorded mileage: 39,000
Price new: £35,000
Yours for: £13,950

See the original advert here

Author
Discussion

S600BSB

Original Poster:

8,546 posts

137 months

Thursday 25th August 2022
quotequote all
Can 335hp and comparative rarity tempt you into a Crossfire?

No.

kambites

71,643 posts

252 months

Thursday 25th August 2022
quotequote all
With that sloped rear screen and rounded rear metalwork being so common these days the Crossfire almost looks well proportioned, kind of like a squashed AMG GT... still drives like a mk1 SLK though.

It's a shame in a way because if they'd built a coupe based on the mk2 SLK AMG instead of the mk1, it could have been quite special.

Edited by kambites on Thursday 25th August 18:11

anonymous-user

85 months

Thursday 25th August 2022
quotequote all
Yes please, performance bargain! What a hoot that would be for not much outlay in the grand scheme of things. There may even be cheaper ones about

hxc_

445 posts

215 months

Thursday 25th August 2022
quotequote all
Awful looking things. Not in a million years.

NDNDNDND

2,546 posts

214 months

Thursday 25th August 2022
quotequote all
Y'know there's actually something quite tempting about...OH MY GOD IT'S AN AUTO KILL IT WITH FIRE!!!!

VR6 Eug

832 posts

230 months

Thursday 25th August 2022
quotequote all
It was based on a poor car and putting an American frock on it, just made it a poor car with American styling and more power wasn't the answer, buying a different car was the answer.

kambites

71,643 posts

252 months

Thursday 25th August 2022
quotequote all
biggbn said:
Yes please, performance bargain! What a hoot that would be for not much outlay in the grand scheme of things. There may even be cheaper ones about
I wouldn't call it a bargain that this price. It weighed a tonne and a half so it only has about 220bhp/tonne which is hardly exceptional. You can get a 370Z for that with the same power, the same weight, and a considerably more capable chassis.

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

221 months

Thursday 25th August 2022
quotequote all
hxc_ said:
Awful looking things. Not in a million years.
Looks great. Maybe not as slick as a regular Crossfire. But certainly a sleek looking coupe. It amazes me how the PH masses only seem to like dull boring cars. And anything with a bit of personality is slated as awful looking... confused Wonder if it's the same with people. hehe

cerb4.5lee

45,105 posts

211 months

Thursday 25th August 2022
quotequote all
I didn't actually know that they did this model. It is a very useful increase in performance I reckon.

These are properly marmite cars that is for sure, but I think I could entertain this version though.

tr7v8

7,625 posts

259 months

Thursday 25th August 2022
quotequote all
Really fancied a cab but found out the boot with the roof down is smaller than my MX5 so that made it a non starter. My Chrysler specialist does quite a few & reckons they're pretty reliable & running costs are reasonable. Same as Jeep getting parts is not difficult.

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

221 months

Thursday 25th August 2022
quotequote all
NDNDNDND said:
Y'know there's actually something quite tempting about...OH MY GOD IT'S AN AUTO KILL IT WITH FIRE!!!!
I think the SRT-6 was only offered as an auto, at least in the UK. frown

Cam Tait

88 posts

151 months

Thursday 25th August 2022
quotequote all
Thought this one might prove divisive! Never been much of a Crossfire fan, but must admit I was curious about the SRT-6...

kambites

71,643 posts

252 months

Thursday 25th August 2022
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
NDNDNDND said:
Y'know there's actually something quite tempting about...OH MY GOD IT'S AN AUTO KILL IT WITH FIRE!!!!
I think the SRT-6 was only offered as an auto, at least in the UK. frown
This one is the complete drivetrain out of the SLK 32AMG isn't it? Mercedes never put a manual gearbox on that engine as far as I know.

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

221 months

Thursday 25th August 2022
quotequote all
Piston Heads said:
Granted, the default five-speed auto goes to show that the Crossfire was still more tourer than tearaway, even in SRT-6 guise. That, and the American market wasn’t nearly as keen on manuals as it is today.
I do wish you guys would do more research when you post such inaccurate info.

In the Crossfires day and years before. All of the performance cars where manual pretty much, often without an auto option.

All Corvettes could be had as a manual (C4, C5, C6). Same with Firebirds, Camaro's and Mustangs.

The Mustang Cobra was manual only, as was the Z06 Corvette (and the C4 ZR-1) and of course the manual only Dodge Viper.

hxc_

445 posts

215 months

Thursday 25th August 2022
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
Looks great. Maybe not as slick as a regular Crossfire. But certainly a sleek looking coupe. It amazes me how the PH masses only seem to like dull boring cars. And anything with a bit of personality is slated as awful looking... confused Wonder if it's the same with people. hehe
I would say I quite like cars with personality... I just don't see how you can call it sleek! I don't think it has a single nice angle.

It sort of reminds me of an Alfa SZ that someone attempted to 'modernise' but did all wrong.

NDNDNDND

2,546 posts

214 months

Thursday 25th August 2022
quotequote all
kambites said:
300bhp/ton said:
NDNDNDND said:
Y'know there's actually something quite tempting about...OH MY GOD IT'S AN AUTO KILL IT WITH FIRE!!!!
I think the SRT-6 was only offered as an auto, at least in the UK. frown
This one is the complete drivetrain out of the SLK 32AMG isn't it? Mercedes never put a manual gearbox on that engine as far as I know.
They did actually - a few years ago we had a rather well-heeled client who drove about in a smart, red, de-badged SLK which was a V6 manual.

kambites

71,643 posts

252 months

Thursday 25th August 2022
quotequote all
NDNDNDND said:
They did actually - a few years ago we had a rather well-heeled client who drove about in a smart, red, de-badged SLK which was a V6 manual.
Wouldn't that have been an SLK320, not an SLK 32AMG? That was certainly available as a manual.

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

221 months

Thursday 25th August 2022
quotequote all
NDNDNDND said:
kambites said:
300bhp/ton said:
NDNDNDND said:
Y'know there's actually something quite tempting about...OH MY GOD IT'S AN AUTO KILL IT WITH FIRE!!!!
I think the SRT-6 was only offered as an auto, at least in the UK. frown
This one is the complete drivetrain out of the SLK 32AMG isn't it? Mercedes never put a manual gearbox on that engine as far as I know.
They did actually - a few years ago we had a rather well-heeled client who drove about in a smart, red, de-badged SLK which was a V6 manual.
A supercharged one, aka the AMG drivetrain? The regular V6 was available with a manual, including in the Crossfire.

cerb4.5lee

45,105 posts

211 months

Thursday 25th August 2022
quotequote all
Cam Tait said:
Thought this one might prove divisive! Never been much of a Crossfire fan, but must admit I was curious about the SRT-6...
That is where I'm at with this version too. The standard cars have never really excited me, but this has definitely raised my interest in them though.

NDNDNDND

2,546 posts

214 months

Thursday 25th August 2022
quotequote all
kambites said:
NDNDNDND said:
They did actually - a few years ago we had a rather well-heeled client who drove about in a smart, red, de-badged SLK which was a V6 manual.
Wouldn't that have been an SLK320, not an SLK 32AMG? That was certainly available as a manual.
Ah no, you're quite right - my mistake!