RE: Jensen FF | Spotted
RE: Jensen FF | Spotted
Thursday 1st September 2022

Jensen FF | Spotted

American muscle, Italian style, British innovation. What a recipe. What a car...


If this doesn’t get the PH fraternity frantically commenting, I’ll eat my trilby. No doubt some of those opinions will be along the lines of “How much?” and “Twenty years ago I nearly swapped an empty Coke bottle for one of those” but hopefully a few at least will be “Good grief, that’s cool”. Because it just is, isn’t it?

The Jensen FF. A grand tourer in the most obvious sense, but also a leftfield option because it wasn’t built by the obvious manufacturers from Britain, Italy or Germany. However, it is British, but in the true spirit of collaboration it used the best bits from around the world. The Italians did the styling, because that’s what they do best. The yanks did the engine, because when you need a big, brawny lump of V8 goodness that’s to whom you turn. And the British did what they do best, which is innovation. Very innovative, in fact. 

Now, just to clear up the confusion that often seems to surround this car, this isn’t an Interceptor. The Interceptor was rear-wheel drive. Ergo it wasn’t the first production road car to use four-wheel drive (and yes, there were plenty of dedicated off-roaders using four-wheel drive then, but we're not talking about those here). The FF took that honour. Some of you will know that already, but the merging of these two models is prolific. And you can tell an FF from an Interceptor by the front wing vents: the FF has two, the Interceptor has one. The FF also had a stainless steel roof, but that’s less obvious when it's been covered in paint.

The FF came about because two Black Country brothers, called Alan and Richard Jensen, wanted to create the ultimate fast yet safe cross-country GT car. And they were used to introducing performance and safety into their cars. In 1956 they offered the Jensen 541 with all-round disc brakes – a year after the Citroen DS introduced them, but still a British production car first – and the 541S that arrived in 1960 was the first British car with standard-fit seatbelts. But such things seem prosaic next to the mighty FF’s innovativeness.

That’s because Jensen’s new model came with Dunlop Maxaret ABS, as well as the famous Ferguson Formula four-wheel drive system. That’s where the FF designation comes from, by the way. It didn’t mean ‘Four Four’, or some such; it stood for Ferguson Formula, as in Harry Ferguson, the tractor genius. This system consisted of a central differential and transfer box, with a torque split of 37:63 between the front and rear axles. Sadly, this was part of the FF’s – and the Jensen company’s – ultimate downfall.

It was a complicated system that, inevitably, brought about some teething troubles. It was also very expensive to produce, which made the FF £1,500 more expensive than the real-drive Interceptor, at £6,000. That was right at the upper echelons of the price scale, not far off Sliver Shadow and Mercedes-Benz SEL 6.3 territory. There were other issues that compounded the difficulties the FF faced, too.

The four-wheel drive’s transfer box was bulky, which made re-engineering the car for left-hand-drive markets difficult. Had they managed to do so, then the FF could’ve potentially sold in prolific numbers buoyed by sales in the States. As it was, they’d delivered just 25 by the end of 1967 and that number had increased to only 320 by the end of the FF’s production in 1972. With volumes like that, there was no point in re-engineering the FF to meet the latest US crash regulations, so potentially one of the safest cars in the world was rendered untenable by safety regulations. You couldn’t make it up, could you?

What a crying shame. Not only was the FF a pioneering car and its makers deserving of more fruit for their labours, but it was also a fabulous thing. In terms of fulfilling its remit of being a supremely accomplished GT car, it turned out to be  supremely accomplished. That 6.3-litre Chrysler V8 mustered 330hp at just 4,600rpm, with a considerable 425lb ft of grunt to back it up from just 2,800rpm. That was channelled through a three-speed auto and all four wheels to give it its performance potential of 131mph and 0-60mph in 7.7 seconds. The year was 1967, remember, so such a performance level was something to behold.

That was accompanied by the most delicious burbling from the V8, along with a comfortable ride and handling that was, give or take, foolproof. And then there was the cabin. On the early models this was a masterclass in interior design to rival the Lamborghini Miura. The Mk1, produced up to 1969, was beset with exquisitely presented dials and an array of James Bond-esque, Q-Branch toggle switches on the centre console. This car isn't quite so bejewelled, being a later '71 model, but that means it's more ergonomically useful and still has the most gorgeous seats. Just look at them. Tell me you wouldn’t wish to plunge into their plushness and head off to find some European sun? I would, I know that. If I had this car I'd be off to Monaco in a shot, and once I'd arrived there, I reckon this car would draw a crowd. A bold claim, granted, given the cars that dwell in the principality - but I think it's true. 


Specification | Jensen FF

Engine: 6,276cc, V8, naturally aspirated
Transmission: Three-speed automatic, four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 330 @ 4,600rpm
Torque (lb ft): 425lb ft @ 2,800rpm
CO2: N/A
MPG: 14 (if you’re lucky)
Recorded mileage: 101,000
Year registered: 1971
Price new: £6,000
Yours for: £119,995

See the full ad here

Author
Discussion

Turini

Original Poster:

477 posts

196 months

Thursday 1st September 2022
quotequote all
Gets my nod

Pistom

6,424 posts

189 months

Thursday 1st September 2022
quotequote all
Looks nice.

Charlie_1

1,069 posts

122 months

Thursday 1st September 2022
quotequote all
I really like this

kibbbs

57 posts

228 months

Thursday 1st September 2022
quotequote all
Ahhh, what a thing.

I have an Interceptor, not an FF, and I can vouch for the fact it certainly draws attention. Almost every time it goes out somebody will come up and want to talk to me about it.

I smirked at the 14 mpg if you’re lucky comment. It’s so true, but sometimes you’ve got to pay for your fun!


Arsecati

2,787 posts

147 months

Thursday 1st September 2022
quotequote all
Dear god that is utterly fabulous! Beyond cool and worth every single penny. Ooooh, damn that is a fine looking car!!!

bongtom

2,018 posts

113 months

Thursday 1st September 2022
quotequote all
Worked in a classic car garage in my youth and they used to have these in for body repairs. First time I had seen lead loading being done.
Tried it a few times and ended up with most of the lead on the floor.

Real art form.

Tyre Smoke

23,018 posts

291 months

Thursday 1st September 2022
quotequote all
On my list, at the top of my numbers come up.

What a beautiful, fabulous bit of British engineering at it's absolute best.

ttthilvester

230 posts

180 months

Thursday 1st September 2022
quotequote all
Glorious!
With the barmy money being asked for pretty much anything these days, is it just me that thinks this is very reasonably priced?

Edited by ttthilvester on Thursday 1st September 07:06

CDP

8,060 posts

284 months

Thursday 1st September 2022
quotequote all
ttthilvester said:
Glorious!
With the barmy money being asked for pretty much anything these days, is it just me that thinks that this is very reasonably priced?
Against Astons and even Jags very reasonable. I could imagine somebody easily sinking that kind of money into rebuilding one considering the rarity and complexity of the mechanics.

Numeric

1,499 posts

181 months

Thursday 1st September 2022
quotequote all
ttthilvester said:
Glorious!
With the barmy money being asked for pretty much anything these days, is it just me that thinks that this is very reasonably priced?
Absolutely agree - considering what this car is and represents along with the apparent usability (not the FFs) I remember owners telling me they had, for me this is just fabulous and the price reasonable.

If I had the cash I absolutely would this over any similarly priced Porsche or something Italian, this represents blokes in overalls and sheds (I know they were not but you know what I mean I hope) using determination slide-rules and ingenuity to build something that was way ahead of its time.

I always think of these as being an automotive Concorde, genius but not able to find a market!

Amanitin

545 posts

167 months

Thursday 1st September 2022
quotequote all
I always wondered why there very very few restomods based on these. A glorious looking car with a st drivetrain is an ideal donor, I would think.
I would love this car to tears with a sensible engine/trans

coppice

9,748 posts

174 months

Thursday 1st September 2022
quotequote all
My next door neighbour had one of these in the 80s - it looked stunning ,was gorgeous to sit in , sounded like a Can Am car and pulled like a train . (By period standards - my very dull daily driver 4wd Hyundai has almost identical performance - that's progress for you ). Pete's FF did like a drink , dropping as low as -eeek - 5mpg and only rarely reaching double figures. He sold it for som tiny figure - 3 grand was it ? - to Cropredy Bridge but it did need TLC .

My favourite Jensen , which another (now sadly late) friend owned was the CV8 - Marmite styling, but I Ioved it - and the same mighty 6.3 V8. WE tok it to a RWYB day at York dragway and I think only a UFO would have got more attention - very few had a clue what it was .

Both were perfect examples of hybrids - when the term meant European style and American brawn , no battery content .

CDP

8,060 posts

284 months

Thursday 1st September 2022
quotequote all
Amanitin said:
I always wondered why there very very few restomods based on these. A glorious looking car with a st drivetrain is an ideal donor, I would think.
I would love this car to tears with a sensible engine/trans
For a GT like this the Chrysler V8 is a pretty sensible power unit; indeed very well suited. So what if it struggles for 20mpg? It's never going to be a daily car and probably never was. As for more power, it's a US V8 so lots of knowledge about.

There was a resto Jenson in one of the Fast and Furious films, where they seemingly confuse London and the UK.

Tyre Smoke

23,018 posts

291 months

Thursday 1st September 2022
quotequote all
Cropredy have a Mk1 FF for sale for the same money. With the glorious array of toggle switches in the centre console.

Matthew-18w4p

50 posts

70 months

Thursday 1st September 2022
quotequote all
Stunning

Coatesy351

891 posts

162 months

Thursday 1st September 2022
quotequote all
Amanitin said:
I always wondered why there very very few restomods based on these. A glorious looking car with a st drivetrain is an ideal donor, I would think.
I would love this car to tears with a sensible engine/trans
Big block Chrysler/ 727 torqueflite is a great combo.

Tyre Smoke

23,018 posts

291 months

Thursday 1st September 2022
quotequote all
Yeah, the engine and auto box aren't the issue, it's when you add in the transfer box and a pair of driven wheels at the front as well it becomes a bit tetchy.

glennjamin

443 posts

93 months

Thursday 1st September 2022
quotequote all
My neighbour had a blue Jeson sounded amazing as he sped off up the road. Was like being in a train wide and pulled and pulled as we went up the dual carriage way at silly speeds. He spent hours cleaning it mostly on the rear window which is unique in shape. He sold it to buy a soft top Land Rover he regrets ever selling it, I would too judging by the price...

TheMilkyBarKid

886 posts

59 months

Thursday 1st September 2022
quotequote all
ttthilvester said:
Glorious!
With the barmy money being asked for pretty much anything these days, is it just me that thinks this is very reasonably priced?

Edited by ttthilvester on Thursday 1st September 07:06
I thought so too, far less than a contemporary Aston. I think it’s lovely cloud9

cerb4.5lee

45,066 posts

210 months

Thursday 1st September 2022
quotequote all
It was always about the engine with these for me. cloud9