RE: Renault Clio V6 | Spotted
RE: Renault Clio V6 | Spotted
Monday 12th September 2022

Renault Clio V6 | Spotted

Think you can tame France's ditch-finder? Better get saving...


Don’t you just love it when a manufacturer throws away the rule book and builds a car that looks completely out of place alongside the rest of its line-up? Like Toyota turning its back on ‘The Toyota Way’ with the GR Yaris, the Albert Biermann-developed Kia Stinger and a Lexus-badged front-engine V10 supercar. And then, of course, there’s the Renaultsport Clio V6, whose inception is every bit as barmy as its wide-arched silhouette would have you think it is.

It all starts with a bizarre championship. The Renault Clio Cup is, or was, a highlight of a BTCC weekend. It was a recipe for complete chaos: fill a grid with (relatively) cheap race-spec Clios, get a bunch of teenagers all looking to show the world how talented they are and pit them against each other on Britain’s finest circuits. It was a major success and when the second-generation Clio arrived in the late 1990s, Renaultsport wanted to build on the success of the Clio Cup by shaking up the formula. Just a bit.

Legendary race car builder Tom Walkinshaw Racing was called upon to shove a Laguna-sourced 2.9-litre V6 in the middle of Renault’s new supermini. The result was a wide-arched, short-wheelbase monster that would form the one-make Clio Trophy series. Naturally, spectators were blown away by the sight of the juiced-up supermini and (somehow) some very cool people at Renault were able to get senior members to give the greenlight to a road-going version.

Interestingly, the first-generation road-going Clio V6 would be assembled by TWR in Sweden, with production shifting to Dieppe in France for the Phase 2. This meant that the mid-engine Clio had a homemade whiff about it, especially on the inside. TWR left the interior largely unchanged, with the bog-standard Clio’s hilariously ugly tri-spoke steering aluminium-look base to the gear lever. You get a set of Renaultsport seats from the Clio 172. And, well, that’s about it.

But none of that matters when you’ve essentially got a road-legal Clio Trophy. Phase 1 examples produced a not insignificant 230hp which, of course, was sent exclusively to the rear wheels and managed by a six-speed manual gearbox. Couple that with the Phase 1’s tiny wheelbase (extended for the Phase 2) and considerably wider track, and the Clio V6 established a reputation as being a bit of a handful in the corners. That, and there was no traction control to act as a safety next when reality hit the fan. Not hard to see why cult classic status beckoned. 

Does that soften the blow of the price tag? Well, the Phase 1 we have here has certain had some of the work done. The previous (and only) owner has had the front and rear subframes rebuilt, new struts and top mounts, and had a new cambelt fitted. That’s just scratching the surface of what is, clearly, a car that seems to have been incredibly well looked after. That’s partly why it’s up for £44,950. A fair bit more than the (admittedly modified) example we featured a couple of years ago, but a quick nose around the market suggests prices have climbed rapidly over the past 18 months - and the V6 was never what you'd call cheap. But it's never been anything less than a modern classic either. 


SPECIFICATION | RENAULT CLIO V6 PHASE 1

Engine: 2,946cc V6
Transmission: 6-speed manual, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 230@6,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 221@3,750rpm
MPG: 25
CO2: 267g/km
Year registered: 2002
Recorded mileage: 55,000
Price new: £26,675
Yours for: £44,950

See the original advert here

Author
Discussion

British Beef

Original Poster:

2,573 posts

196 months

Monday 12th September 2022
quotequote all
Brilliant car that is deeply flawed.

They look faster than they go is the biggest downside for me.

I would love one, but couldnt justify when they were £20k. I ended up getting an E39 M5 during that decision process.

sixor8

8,625 posts

299 months

Monday 12th September 2022
quotequote all
Looks likely that it was the 55k mile example that went unsold at H+H on 27th July with a reserve of £40k:

https://www.glenmarch.com/auction-cars/show-backup...

Looking at the auction results on the H+H website, lot 33 is strangely missing.... scratchchin

More realistically, a similar car went for £36k at Silverstone in May:

https://www.silverstoneauctions.com/sa079-lot-1809...

Only 4 years ago, Phase 1 cars were available for £16,800 frown

https://www.historics.co.uk/buying/auctions/2018-0...

Court_S

14,803 posts

208 months

Monday 12th September 2022
quotequote all
I love these. They’re so bonkers and daft.

Crazy to see where the prices are now given where they were a few years ago. They’re certainly a rare beast these days.

GTRene

22,709 posts

255 months

Monday 12th September 2022
quotequote all
would not buy a fase 1 clio V6

a fase 2 on the other hand, better, nicer looks, still to low on power and you sit high I believe (it was a long time ago that I took a test sit in one, so I forgot the details, lets just say, I was not impressed enough to chase it.. and then they were at their lowest entry level :-)

still nice though, a bit strange, but in a good way.

Bloxxcreative

568 posts

76 months

Monday 12th September 2022
quotequote all
Bonkers money. It's a nit niche and unique but I would pay any premium for that. I know not comparable but could get any manner of more exotic metal for some of the prices being asked that look, handle, ride and sound better.

satfinal

2,625 posts

193 months

Monday 12th September 2022
quotequote all
These came in some great colours, it's a bit of a shame nearly all the PH1s are silver, and nearly all the PH2s are blue.

Same deal with the 172/182s, but the 182s had a little bit more of a mix.

Dombilano

1,466 posts

86 months

Monday 12th September 2022
quotequote all
Incredibly well looked after?
I'm thinking it was more likely left to fail its 2015 MOT needing 10k worth of structural restoration to get it to its present state. 7 years inactivity scares me.


rare6499

863 posts

170 months

Monday 12th September 2022
quotequote all
I test drove one (PH1) many many years back when I had a 172 Cup. The 172 felt faster, and certainly steered much better. But the V6 looked incredible and had an amazing sense of drama and theatre about it that the Cup couldn’t compete with. In the end I decided not to buy it, but I sure wish I had done. PH2 of course is well known for being a significantly better car all round, but the PH1 still looks superb.

Agent57

2,680 posts

185 months

Monday 12th September 2022
quotequote all
Nice idea. They obviously spent all the money on the engine and exterior so nothing left for the interior


MrHooky

238 posts

173 months

Monday 12th September 2022
quotequote all
Some big money being asked for these on CC recently.

https://collectingcars.com/for-sale/2005-renault-c...

https://collectingcars.com/for-sale/2004-renault-c...

Love how they look but think the drive would be disappointing. My 2.7 Boxster 986 has similar power (probably better power to weight) and was sub £5k.

Still wish I'd bought one when Phase IIs were sub £20k...



Bobby Lee

308 posts

86 months

Monday 12th September 2022
quotequote all
DriveSnowdonia said:
British Beef said:
Brilliant car that is deeply flawed.

They look faster than they go is the biggest downside for me.
From memory wasn't the regular Clio 182 of the era, just as quick over the 1/4 mile?
Yes, and I think there was only about 0.1sec in it on the 0-60!

Krikkit

27,938 posts

212 months

Monday 12th September 2022
quotequote all
Apparently the car that spawned the mad economy special Lupo 3L - VW heard that Renault were working on a Clio 3L, and assumed it was a mad high-economy project, and went on a mad engineering binge making a polo use 3L/100km of fuel.

cerb4.5lee

45,080 posts

211 months

Monday 12th September 2022
quotequote all
If you believe what you read then these are terrible to drive. However I will never forget the first time I saw one at the motorshow, and it was easily one of my favourite cars of the show. The idea of it was wonderful I thought at the time.

M22s

606 posts

180 months

Monday 12th September 2022
quotequote all
I’ll always love these. It’s just lacks any common sense which makes it exponentially cooler. Any faults are easily forgiven.

Mikebentley

8,692 posts

171 months

Monday 12th September 2022
quotequote all
Wish I’d got one when they were £10 -15k. It’s a weird novelty and all the better for that.

Canon_Fodder

1,775 posts

94 months

Monday 12th September 2022
quotequote all
Better to be on the outside than on the inside

drewos

176 posts

215 months

Monday 12th September 2022
quotequote all
Wish I'd had £12k in 2013 when the guy who brought his phase 2 in for an MOT to the Renault dealership I worked in then was asking for it...

Used to see one getting used for the commute for a couple of years too..

Derek182

217 posts

111 months

Monday 12th September 2022
quotequote all
Bobby Lee said:
Yes, and I think there was only about 0.1sec in it on the 0-60!
Certainly when I used to track Clio 172/182s the story was that they were at least as quick as a Clio V6 around a circuit with far less skill required to drive them quickly and safely!

KarlMac

4,627 posts

172 months

Monday 12th September 2022
quotequote all
Phase 2 in Liquid yellow is a lottery win car for me. Not too fused about the ph1

Mr Tidy

31,755 posts

158 months

Monday 12th September 2022
quotequote all
Derek182 said:
Bobby Lee said:
Yes, and I think there was only about 0.1sec in it on the 0-60!
Certainly when I used to track Clio 172/182s the story was that they were at least as quick as a Clio V6 around a circuit with far less skill required to drive them quickly and safely!
Maybe, but quicker doesn't necessarily generate more excitement which is surely what most people on here want!

The whole concept was barking mad in such a good way! They deserve some credit for that alone.

I saw a blue Phase 2 yesterday morning at a local pub car meet and it certainly attracted plenty of attention!