RE: Hyundai Coupe V6 | Shed of the Week
RE: Hyundai Coupe V6 | Shed of the Week
Friday 16th September 2022

Hyundai Coupe V6 | Shed of the Week

Very cheap sports cars aren't exactly thick on the ground. Thank goodness for half-forgotten Hyundais


Shed has gone on his holidays this week. He always stays in the same converted stable that he picked up for a song a few years back. He thought it would make him a small fortune in rental income, but two things spoiled it: Covid, and the fact that nobody knows where Silesia is.

Anyway, it's an ill wind that blows nobody any good. Thanks to the complete absence of renters, Shed can go to his bolthole any time he likes. The main problem is that there is only half a megabyte of internet at any given moment out there and as such Shed has had to rely on a combination of instinct and his sense of smell to pick out this week's sub-£1,500 selection.  

What he's come up with is a late phase 1 example of the gen-two Hyundai Coupe which ran from 2002 to 2007 or thereabouts. Two versions of the Coupe were sold in the UK, a 2.0-litre four and this, the somewhat rarer 2.7-litre V6. Being honest, the Hyundai Coupe wasn't the most satisfying car of its type to drive, or the roomiest (although the boot was surprisingly big) but what it did have going for it was its styling. In most of the big markets outside Europe they called it the Tiburon, which is Spanish for shark. In Korea it was known as the Turbulence.

The UK importers must have been strongly tempted to call it the Flatulence because neither of the engines were high achievers. The 2.0 had around 135hp and the 2.7 only had 165hp, which was a long way behind the 240hp that the 2.7-litre six in Porsche's Boxster was putting out at that time. With over 1,400kg to move, the V6's 181lb ft still managed to get the six-speed manual Coupe through the 0-60 in under eight seconds en route to a top speed of 135mph. This one is a conventional auto, though, which is less than optimal from a performance perspective but at least it gets you round problems you might have had with the manual box's sometimes quirky clutch.

The Hyundai V6 engine is kind of like the one in the 2.5-litre V6 Mondeo. Press the throttle and you'll get more noise but not much more performance. A basic chip tune-up on the V6 would liberate an extra 15-20hp and around 20lb ft, but the absence of a turbo made it hard to get big, cheap improvements. The under-stressed nature of the engine should have meant decent longevity although in reality the V6 did acquire a bit of a reputation for bottom end trouble. Having said that, it could be made to sound pretty good with a new exhaust and sportlicher air filter.

Our Shed has done 98,000 miles all told, and getting on for 10,000 of those have been racked up since the last MOT in January, which if nothing else tells you that it's as mobile as you'd hope a car to be. That last test picked up some front inner tyre wear, some play in a front wheel bearing, and a small exhaust blow. They were the advisories left on the ticket after an initial fail due to wafer-thin brake pads, a fritzing EML, and what was described as an excessively damaged anti-lock braking component, all of which were presumably rectified.

There seems to be some suspect bodywork above the offside rear wheel which ties in with the model's propensity for arch and door edge rust. Shed also remembers these Coupes having a bit of bother with their UK-installed alarm systems. He's no believer in alarms generally. His strong sense of self-preservation means that he would never race over to apprehend anyone who had triggered an alarm on somebody else's car. Life's too short. By the same token he wouldn't expect anyone to intervene in the theft of his own car. Obviously, it helps that nobody in their right mind would want to be seen dead in any vehicle owned by Shed, but that's not the point is it?

Trade prices for V6 Coupes of this age range from £1,350 to £2,300, so technically at least this one is at the cheap end of the scale. The reality of buying something like this is that you'd really need to be in love with the shape to accept old-school fuel consumption figures like 27mpg. In mixed use you'd have to steel yourself for something in the low twenties or even worse. It all sounds slightly depressing, but it could be worse: you could be holed up with Shed in Sliesia wondering when the next horse and cart might be coming through.


See the original advert here

Author
Discussion

mrclav

Original Poster:

1,645 posts

253 months

Friday 16th September 2022
quotequote all
A true shed if there ever was one.

Avoid.

Tyre Smoke

23,018 posts

291 months

Friday 16th September 2022
quotequote all
Not for me. Always thought they had the look of a Wish version of a sporting coupé.
In fact the whole Hyundai range of that era looked like that. Then they got their act together.


Cambs_Stuart

3,539 posts

114 months

Friday 16th September 2022
quotequote all
I'm not overwhelmed with this one. Slow, thirsty, limited turning potential, and auto box. Plus rust and a few issues so sort out.
And the power output is only slightly better than a 2.8 capri from the 80s

Mark-C

7,715 posts

235 months

Friday 16th September 2022
quotequote all
Wroclaw is quite interesting for a few hours. I suspect the same is true of this shed ...

Kipsrs

722 posts

79 months

Friday 16th September 2022
quotequote all
I think it was Mr Clarckson who said it had the looks of a Ferrari. . . I’ve always struggled to see that myself.

benzinbob

750 posts

86 months

Friday 16th September 2022
quotequote all
Kipsrs said:
I think it was Mr Clarckson who said it had the looks of a Ferrari. . . I’ve always struggled to see that myself.
If you were stood a hundred paces back, it was behind a tree and you were blind, maybe.

Alorotom

12,788 posts

217 months

Friday 16th September 2022
quotequote all
The Gen.2 was a massive improvement on the truly hideous Gen.1 and I’m amazed this has lived so long - there can’t be too many of them left now (not a bad thing though)

What on earth is on the boot lid above the key hole?!

Weso60

71 posts

71 months

Friday 16th September 2022
quotequote all
Love the make shift glove box lock, and as said what is that on tailgate?

0ddball

916 posts

169 months

Friday 16th September 2022
quotequote all
This is a car that needed an interesting engine to redeem it, but it ended up a modern day Ford Cougar. Not a really terrible car, but not one that anybody wants to own.

Jonny_

4,716 posts

237 months

Friday 16th September 2022
quotequote all
Alorotom said:
The Gen.2 was a massive improvement on the truly hideous Gen.1 and I’m amazed this has lived so long - there can’t be too many of them left now (not a bad thing though)

What on earth is on the boot lid above the key hole?!
Yes, I wondered the same. Horribly botched reversing camera installation, maybe?

These are a handsome car, can see the appeal, but this one in particular looks a bit of a dog. Thirsty but sluggish V6 auto with ropey bodywork. Probably best avoided!

st3ven1

235 posts

237 months

Friday 16th September 2022
quotequote all
Some bodge on the glovebox, makes you wonder what else has been 'fixed' by a previous owner.

I suspect the crudely fitted bracket above the rear badge would have been a reverse camera or part of a dash camera system.

I also suspect it's the £615 road tax would put people off cars of this ilk.

humphra

633 posts

122 months

Friday 16th September 2022
quotequote all
£1290 for a ropey p/x to clear, with botched glovebox lock and the same on the boot...... its already started a journey towards being some odd hybrid of rat/ steam punk vehicle and also telling us a lot about what sort of money will have been skimped on proper maintenance.

Though I've got to say full marks to the seller for temerity at keeping it for sale on the forecourt! Dealers with more shame might have just pushed it through an auction.

rallycross

13,758 posts

267 months

Friday 16th September 2022
quotequote all
The v6 manual version is not a bad thing to drive the killer is the road tax on these I had an 08 v6 coupe road tax was in the top band ( over £600 ).

kambites

71,599 posts

251 months

Friday 16th September 2022
quotequote all
I always quite liked the styling of these, but nothing else about them really appeals. I suppose there's still quite a lot around which implies they're pretty reliable.

cerb4.5lee

45,080 posts

210 months

Friday 16th September 2022
quotequote all
This is my kind of car in many ways because I love coupes and I love V6 petrol engines too. However I'm not keen on the auto in this one, plus the performance/mpg mix is nothing short of terrible. In saying that I don't mind the looks though, and I can still think of worse sheds to travel around in as well.

I'm slightly tempted...

Heathwood

3,036 posts

232 months

Friday 16th September 2022
quotequote all
benzinbob said:
Kipsrs said:
I think it was Mr Clarckson who said it had the looks of a Ferrari. . . I’ve always struggled to see that myself.
If you were stood a hundred paces back, it was behind a tree and you were blind, maybe.
There is a tiny bit of 456 in the profile. And I mean a tiny bit.

cerb4.5lee

45,080 posts

210 months

Friday 16th September 2022
quotequote all
0ddball said:
This is a car that needed an interesting engine to redeem it, but it ended up a modern day Ford Cougar. Not a really terrible car, but not one that anybody wants to own.
That is a very good sum up I reckon. Coincidentally I did test drive a V6 Ford Cougar years ago and I really liked it...but I still ended up buying a Mondeo ST24 instead though.

Wren-went

1,066 posts

68 months

Friday 16th September 2022
quotequote all
These were ok 10 to 15 years ago but I certainly wouldn't pay with it being an 06 £615 a year road tax, wouldn't be surprised if the previous owner part ex it due to the cost and because it's a little ropey so no doubt been neglected.

Last week's shed was far better didn't a pH member post he had bought it the Micra 160sr was worth buying don't think anyone will be in a rush to buy this.

Brynjaminjones

120 posts

153 months

Friday 16th September 2022
quotequote all
Not fast or exciting in any way, but these are great cars in my experience.
My Mum has had two over the last 20+ years as her daily drivers - a very early 4-eye one from 1999, then a 2008 facelift version of this one, bought in 2012.
Admittedly both were the 2.0, so I don't have any experience with the V6.

The first one was written off in an accident at 150,000 miles, having bought it at around 10,000. In that time all it ever needed were some wheel bearings and a new catalytic converter.

The one she has now has been equally great, although she hasn't put as many miles on it yet. It's gone from about 25,000 to 80,000. The AC compressor recently failed but that's about it.

In a family full of German cars and a few others, these Coupes have been by far the most trouble free and dependable, with a very low cost of ownership.

She didn't care about performance - these served the purpose well as a nice-looking runabout.

Edited by Brynjaminjones on Friday 16th September 08:20

CoffeePls

112 posts

68 months

Friday 16th September 2022
quotequote all
Can't we just re-run last week's Micra please?