RE: Aston Martin Rapide AMR | Spotted
RE: Aston Martin Rapide AMR | Spotted
Tuesday 10th January 2023

Aston Martin Rapide AMR | Spotted

A track focused V12 saloon doesn't make much sense on paper, but it does on the road


There’s a lot Andy Palmer got right during his stint as Aston Martin CEO. He was a key driver in transforming the British marque’s ageing production line with the DB11 and Vantage, both of which marked a considerable step forward over their predecessors (at least, in a technical sense). Not to mention the controversial move to launch an SUV, which  has been a sales hit and a major revenue generator.  

So while he received a fair amount of stick for taking the company public, you could argue that his replacement Tobias Moers (who lasted less than two years in the job) had the core ingredients to get Aston Martin back on track and head towards into profitability. Moreover, one of Palmer’s lesser-known legacies during his six-year stint at the top was positioning Aston Martin as a performance brand to appeal to a younger audience. It was to be spearheaded by the incredible Valkyrie and upcoming Valhalla hypercars, with the rest of the line-up getting sportier variants with questionable lime green highlights and the AMR suffix.

Makes sense, right? The company has a long history of endurance racing that, until the launch of the AMR sub-brand, wasn’t all that well represented in the firm’s lineup. Naturally, the V12-engined DB11 and both old and new generations of Vantage were given the AMR treatment. Less obvious was the Rapide AMR. Though nowhere near as old as the Vantage platform, the Rapide was getting rather long in the tooth when the sportier iteration came along in 2019 and clearly it hadn’t been the company’s posterchild for GT racing like the Vantage had.

In that regard, the Rapide AMR didn’t make a while lot of a sense. But when you consider that it was more a farewell to the company’s four-door saloon, it’s understandable why Aston wanted to send the Rapide off in style. And boy, did it put the work in. Up front is the same 5.9-litre V12 from the limited-run Vantage GT12, developing 603hp and 456lb ft of torque. Staggering numbers for a naturally aspirated engine and 45hp more than the Rapide S. The eight-speed automatic gearbox was also tweaked for snappier shifts, while the dampers were recalibrated after extensive testing on the Nurburgring. Topping it all off where carbon ceramic brakes, with six-piston calipers at the front and four at the rear.

It needed them, too, with the AMR tipping the scales at a smidgen under two tonnes. So it’s no four-door GT3 RS then, but Matt still found the AMR “more engaging and more satisfying to drive, while still immensely relaxing, cossetting and cool when required.” Find one in the right colour combination and the Rapide’s epilogue could very well be all the Aston Martin you could ever want.

Enter the AMR we have here. This 11,000-mile example does away with the divisive lime green highlights for a straight black finish throughout. Yes, the spec does tone down some of the wilder styling changes that were introduced on the AMR (not that we’re complaining), but it still looks every bit as menacing as a 603hp V12 Aston Martin should. This was at least a £200,000 car when new in 2019, which makes the £149,990 price tag of this model a little more bearable. And although it may not have the racing pedigree of the Vantage AMR models, it still played its part in transforming Aston Martin into the company it is today. Which means we don't have to give Lawrence Stroll all the credit.


SPECIFICATION | ASTON MARTIN RAPIDE AMR

Engine: 5,935cc V12
Transmission: 8-speed automatic, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 603@7,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 465@N/Arpm
MPG: 21.9 (Rapide S)
CO2: 300g/km (Rapide S)
Year registered: 2019
Recorded mileage: 11,000
Price new: £194,950
Yours for: £149,990

See the original advert here

Author
Discussion

mrclav

Original Poster:

1,645 posts

253 months

Tuesday 10th January 2023
quotequote all
They're a big old beast but that one looks rather purposeful.

mersontheperson

732 posts

195 months

Tuesday 10th January 2023
quotequote all
Still another 100k to depreciate, I will wait 6 years and buy it when it has 30,000 miles on the clock

Vee12V

1,410 posts

190 months

Tuesday 10th January 2023
quotequote all
It's a no from me. That thing just looks vulgar and way too try hard. It actually sums up everything Aston got wrong from then on. Certainly visually.

smilo996

3,862 posts

200 months

Tuesday 10th January 2023
quotequote all
Apart from the manta ray grille, love these. They look so good in the flesh and who cares about crippled passengers, V12.
Enough room for luggage/ small kids/ gran and V12.

GreatScott2016

2,560 posts

118 months

Tuesday 10th January 2023
quotequote all
Vee12V said:
It's a no from me. That thing just looks vulgar and way too try hard. It actually sums up everything Aston got wrong from then on. Certainly visually.
Have to agree. Black on black doesn't work either IMHO.

cypriot

516 posts

129 months

Tuesday 10th January 2023
quotequote all
I have had the pleasure of spending a bit of time with one of these, and I must say they are totally underrated. So special inside and out. But the standout is the way this car goes down a road, it is unbelievably good! Whoever tuned the damping has done the best job of any car I have been in, simply staggering how good the body control is, whilst still having amazing ride quality over bumps lumps. Couple that with a glorious engine, and you have a car that you can really hustle and enjoy doing so. Absolutely leagues ahead of any porsche product with 4 seats.

Nigel_O

3,882 posts

249 months

Tuesday 10th January 2023
quotequote all
As a Vantage owner, I should love this, but it has somehow lost its “Aston-ness”…. I think the early Rapide is much closer to the usual subtle but beautiful Aston styling.

The second photo looks like someone has grafted some Aston rear lights onto a Mercedes of some sort.

MDL111

8,920 posts

207 months

Tuesday 10th January 2023
quotequote all
I like how that looks and the engine, the price not so much

BigChiefmuffinAgain

1,772 posts

128 months

Tuesday 10th January 2023
quotequote all
I'd prefer a BMW M5CS for that sort of money. Something a little unresolved about this.

Chubbyross

5,005 posts

115 months

Tuesday 10th January 2023
quotequote all
mersontheperson said:
Still another 100k to depreciate, I will wait 6 years and buy it when it has 30,000 miles on the clock
Agreed. It’s got a long long way to fall. Someone’s going to take a hefty hit for the next few years if they buy at this price.

nismo48

7,165 posts

237 months

Tuesday 10th January 2023
quotequote all
Chubbyross said:
mersontheperson said:
Still another 100k to depreciate, I will wait 6 years and buy it when it has 30,000 miles on the clock
Agreed. It’s got a long long way to fall. Someone’s going to take a hefty hit for the next few years if they buy at this price.
Agree..!! smile

ate one too

2,914 posts

176 months

Tuesday 10th January 2023
quotequote all
Article said

"Up front is the same 5.9-litre V12 from the limited-run Vantage GT12, developing 603hp and 456lb ft of torque. Staggering numbers for a naturally aspirated engine and 45hp more than the Rapide S."


Ferrari's Tipo F140 V12 began as a 6.0 litre with 651 bhp and 485 lb of torque in 2002 - even more staggering ? smile

Speedgirl

291 posts

197 months

Tuesday 10th January 2023
quotequote all
Just no!
That Sat nav screen.
That gloomy matt black interior.
And the fact that you can pick up the boggo V12 version in a nicer colour with same miles for £60k.
eek

ex-devonpaul

1,748 posts

167 months

Tuesday 10th January 2023
quotequote all
Speedgirl said:
Just no!
That Sat nav screen.
That gloomy matt black interior.
And the fact that you can pick up the boggo V12 version in a nicer colour with same miles for £60k.
eek
Yebbut, this is "Certified Pre-owned". It says it on the bottom of the dealer's plates.

Just need to work out what they actually mean by that, as "Confirmed Second Hand" is probably not the translation they intend.

lukeharding

3,716 posts

119 months

Tuesday 10th January 2023
quotequote all
nismo48 said:
Chubbyross said:
mersontheperson said:
Still another 100k to depreciate, I will wait 6 years and buy it when it has 30,000 miles on the clock
Agreed. It’s got a long long way to fall. Someone’s going to take a hefty hit for the next few years if they buy at this price.
Agree..!! smile
Considering the rarity of it, and the steady pricing so far...

ITP

2,747 posts

227 months

Tuesday 10th January 2023
quotequote all
I think it’s great. Not the best looking Aston but there’s not much similar for a ‘sense of occasion’ car with 4 seats.

Although, on paper, an M5 or E63 etc are ‘better’, in reality someone who is interested in this won’t be interested in the top model of a mass produced saloon.

It will be one of these, or maybe a gtc4 lusso, a top end quattroporte/granturismo etc. Something that’s rare, looks special and different to the masses when you walk up to it, when you get in and the noise when you fire up the engine and when driving. 0-60 times are irrelevant, all these cars are more than fast enough as road cars.

Do they have as much tech, as much legroom in the back, a big boot? No, but all these things are not the priority for buyers of these cars. Did anyone ever not buy an Aston just because of the infotainment?

Strider

166 posts

261 months

Tuesday 10th January 2023
quotequote all
I tried buying a 'Timeless' Vantage V12 last year. Aston Martin Works agreed the trade-in on my 911, they had exactly the car I wanted, everything was ready. Then when I asked for a test drive, they said I would have to agree to buy the car first and pay the deposit. So I bought another Porsche.

ITP

2,747 posts

227 months

Tuesday 10th January 2023
quotequote all
Strider said:
I tried buying a 'Timeless' Vantage V12 last year. Aston Martin Works agreed the trade-in on my 911, they had exactly the car I wanted, everything was ready. Then when I asked for a test drive, they said I would have to agree to buy the car first and pay the deposit. So I bought another Porsche.
Thats a good reason for not buying a car. They should tell you that before you spend the time going to look at their cars and bother getting a trade in valuation. Sounds like a monumental waste of everyones time.
Like buying a house that you are not allowed inside it before you commit.

V8V Quadcamboy

168 posts

53 months

Tuesday 10th January 2023
quotequote all
This thread from the Aston Martin forum might change a lot of opinions on how special and practical they are:

https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...

Marc V12 AMR Q

3 posts

99 months

Tuesday 10th January 2023
quotequote all
What an outstanding and superb masterpiece car. Great engine, superb design, absolutely unique with the V12 perfect sounding engine. I really love it !