RE: BMW launches new mild-hybrid X5 and X6 M
RE: BMW launches new mild-hybrid X5 and X6 M
Wednesday 22nd February 2023

BMW launches new mild-hybrid X5 and X6 M

Don't worry - the 625hp 4.4-litre V8 is retained. But maybe do worry about the styling (again)


We talked about the updated X5 and X6 earlier this month, not expecting the M versions to follow on quite so abruptly. But here we are - and in many ways the news is more significant than it was for the conventional lineup, because BMW has used the flagship Competition models to debut its latest 48v tech on the shared 4.4-litre V8, making them the first M cars to qualify for (very) mild hybrid status.

Of course, in point of fact, we have seen the combination feature elsewhere - specifically in the new X7 M60i we drove towards the end of last year - but that isn’t a proper M car, and nor does it get the feature the V8’s full-fat 625hp output. Nevertheless, the 12hp/147lb ft hybrid setup is evidently the same, integrated into an updated version of the eight-speed M Steptronic transmission. 

Now, based on our previous experience of the X7, the even-more-powerful version of the 4.4-litre unit needs the additional assistance like a hurricane needs a desk fan (BMW doesn’t even bother accounting for its contribution in the latest power figures) but that isn’t to say that it won’t gently aid functionality from a standing start - and if nothing else, the 48v generator is used to summon the mighty engine smartly back to life when the traffic lights change. So there's that. 

What you should not expect it to do is dramatically enhance the efficiency of what is still a brace of large SUVs, now endowed with even more kit - not least the latest M cockpit with BMW’s single-piece Curved Display. When we last drove the X5 M Competition back in 2020, we quoted 22mpg and 290g/km CO2 as combined averages; for the latest model, BMW provisionally claims 295-291g/km CO2 and 21.6-21.9mpg (depending on wheel and tyre size) so clearly the mild-hybrid version isn’t going to be sipping at its fuel tank like a well-fed hummingbird. 

There’s a fair chance that the discrepancy there can be attributed to weight gain; BMW doesn’t commit to a figure for either new model, although we’d be willing to bet that neither variant has shed any pounds (the latest X7 was over 100kg heavier than its predecessor). Having said that, the manufacturer promises the same 3.9-second-0-62mph time for both regardless - so there’s no reason to think the cars will be any less ballistic than the previous X5 or X6 M. An optional M Driver’s pack will bump the top speed to 180mph from 155mph if you wish. 

We’d anticipate them sounding fast, too. BMW insists there have been a number of detailed mechanical changes - a new air intake duct, vane-type oil pump and lightweight plastic oil sump among them, as well as modified ratios and sharper gear shifts from the retuned torque converter - but it also mentions ‘dramatic sound’ from a standard M Sport exhaust system. This incorporates new catalytic converters, too, but expect the net effect of the dual-branch pipework and electronically controlled flaps to deliver a suitably rumbly presence. 

Chances are that both cars will drive in the established manner, as well. Which is to say very ably. Both retain the bespoke M-grade xDrive system, and an Active M Differential to distribute power across the back axle for that ‘signature’ rear-driven feel. Additionally, BMW says the electronic diff now works ‘in tandem’ with the xDrive system to reduce reliance on the stability control system when near the limit of traction. Which ought to make for a more consistent feel on the road when pushing on. 

And if that doesn’t necessarily appeal to repeat customers, news of ‘reworked dampers’ is likely to prick their ears up. The previous models were not known for a particularly restful ride, but with standard active-roll stabilisation now available to counteract lateral forces, claims made for ‘even greater composure’ will hopefully ring true in the driving. Ditto efforts made to improve the variable-ratio steering. 

Naturally, all this might be for naught if you’re not partial to the way the new X5 and X6 M look - and in this area, subjectively speaking, BMW has apparently done its level best to again shoot itself in the foot (or at the very least, take no prisoners). Suffice it to say, both models feature slimmer headlights, new kidney grilles and ‘wide-open’ air intakes for a more aggressive appearance. As is traditional, the X5 is arguably mildly easier on the eye than the X6, but neither is going to unduly concern any Land Rover dealer in the process of selling the latest Range Rover Sport - especially when they start at £123,350 for the X5 M, and £126,050 for the X6 M. But we could be wrong: if so, both cars are available to order now. Deliveries begin in the spring. 


Author
Discussion

sidesauce

Original Poster:

2,967 posts

248 months

Tuesday 21st February 2023
quotequote all
Those two are... challenging aesthetically.

Wow.

Oz83

720 posts

169 months

Tuesday 21st February 2023
quotequote all
The green one would be quite smart with some silver trim and wheels. It looks really dull with everything blacked out.

GT9

9,051 posts

202 months

Tuesday 21st February 2023
quotequote all
Grille too small, or is it too big, I've lost track.
Gopping.
Something about lipstick and pigs.
Gopping, did I mention gopping.
Munter, yeah don't forget that.
E46.
Anything I missed?

Water Fairy

6,635 posts

185 months

Tuesday 21st February 2023
quotequote all
E24
E38
E39
E46

When did it go so wrong?

premixer

54 posts

127 months

Tuesday 21st February 2023
quotequote all
Don't actually mind the grille on the X5, looks quite good.

X6, well have never understood those in the first place, and this still just seems a strange vehicle

pacdes

785 posts

191 months

Tuesday 21st February 2023
quotequote all
Might as well be powered by dog poo. Because the styling has everything else wrapped up.

anonymous-user

84 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2023
quotequote all
rofl

Changan called they want their "dog having a poo" CS85 design back



Edited by anonymous-user on Wednesday 22 February 01:05

Terminator X

20,825 posts

234 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2023
quotequote all
There must be a target market for these planet sized vehicles but for the life of me WTAF!

TX.

Gruntled

196 posts

109 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2023
quotequote all
Is there an equivalent to Crimes Against Humanity in car design? Because if not, there should be, and if so please someone call the International Court of Aesthetic Justice.

drpep

1,761 posts

198 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2023
quotequote all
Throbber on wheels.

If insecurity and testosterone had a love child, manifest in automotive form.

Strewth. These things can fk right off.

T1berious

2,675 posts

185 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2023
quotequote all
drpep said:
Throbber on wheels.

If insecurity and testosterone had a love child, manifest in automotive form.

Strewth. These things can fk right off.
^This^

£130k? Once you've got past the looks, swallowed the price, you're still stunned. Who is going to buy this?

A quick glance at the Porsche configurator got a Cayenne Turbo for 10k less and I still dropped 15k worth of extras at it!

Influencer's need only apply....

Corkys

304 posts

231 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2023
quotequote all
Not only is the outside awful. The inside is too.
Why do they put a massive screen plonked on the dashboard??? Merc do it as well, they look Crap.

MOOSECORTINA

253 posts

109 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2023
quotequote all
Love the 4.4 V8. My god they are ugly. Come on BMW change the exterior design team, see if anyone from Audi is available or any other manufacturer for that matter. I know, run an infant school competition to design a car.

anonymous-user

84 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2023
quotequote all
My wife is ugly but these good lord.....they make a rhino's but look pretty.

who in the hell buys this rubbish?

PVAR

44 posts

235 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2023
quotequote all
X6 looking particularly oinky

Howard1650

345 posts

221 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2023
quotequote all
I'm sure these cars are technically brilliant, delivering great performance and everyday practicality, but I just can't get past the looks. I've no idea why BMW think their current line up are stylish or attractive. Just based on how ugly these vehicles have become, surely they must be seeing falling sales and a loss of market share.

Oliver80

366 posts

51 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2023
quotequote all
Prefer the X5 to the new Range Rover Sport which is an odd looking thing (especially compared to its bigger brother).

Pusikurac

121 posts

70 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2023
quotequote all
Too expensive, ugly, blah blah.
I think it looks good, both of them, X5 maybe better.
Who buys these? A lot of people actually, BMW has record profits and stock is doing really good.

cerb4.5lee

44,944 posts

210 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2023
quotequote all
I'd happily have the X5M(not in green though) if I could afford one. I've always liked them.

fantheman80

2,661 posts

79 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2023
quotequote all
BMWs design stuidio:


"And now send the images to Piston Heads!"


If the area below the kidneys was body colour coded I dont think there would be the level of porridge being spat out today