RE: Ford Puma ST adds 1.0-litre Ecoboost option
RE: Ford Puma ST adds 1.0-litre Ecoboost option
Wednesday 8th March 2023

Ford Puma ST adds 1.0-litre Ecoboost option

Latest ST Powershift variant gets most powerful version of award-winning three-pot yet


With Lamborghini and Ferrari vying to do ever more interesting things with enormous V12 engines, and the rest of the industry electrifying anything that moves, you could be forgiven for thinking that there isn’t too much room left in the middle for those of us unable to lavish six figures on a car - or unwilling to go battery-powered. Well, this isn’t necessarily going to have you jumping around the room, but Ford has today announced that it will bring together its 1.0-litre Ecoboost engine and ST badge on a new Puma variant. 

True enough, the result is not going to trouble a Purosangue owner’s heart rate. Together with the introduction of its seven-speed ‘Powershift’ dual-clutch automatic, the new ST is intended to tickle your parsimonious bone at least as much as your funny one - Ford reckons it’ll average 44.8mpg and emit a kindly 144g/km CO2; a modest improvement on the more powerful, manual-only 1.5-litre three-cylinder unit. Additionally, it earns 48-volt mild-hybrid status, so it ought to be as convenient to drive as a pack of huskies in sight of home. Which, presumably, is what its customers have been asking for. 

What it will not be, of course, is neck-troublingly fast. Thanks in part to more efficient energy recovery and a faster charging lithium-ion battery pack that has claimed an additional 10hp from the hybrid gubbings - and to ‘unique software tuning’ on the turbocharged three-pot - this 170hp derivative of the 1.0-litre Ecoboost is the most powerful yet. But at 7.4 seconds to 62mph, it still lags behind the 200hp ST by the better part of a second. Its maker says it has recalibrated the Powershift ‘box to better suit the 183lb ft of torque available at 3,000rpm, although it’s hard to imagine its in-gear performance rivalling the 236lb ft available to the 1.5-litre owner. 

Amusingly, Ford points out in the bumf that the ST Powershift ‘produces exactly twice the power-per-litre of a 2002 Focus ST170’ which is an odd claim to fame given that model’s famously anemic performance. The manufacturer is on safer ground when it draws our collective attention to the fact that the Powershift version shares the optimised chassis of the existing ST - which means a 50 per cent stiffer rear twist-beam, Ford’s patented ‘force vectoring’ springs and a steering rack 25 per cent faster than the standard Puma. No mention of the Quaife limited-slip diff that originally came with the Performance Pack (unsurprisingly) but you can likely expect much the same tightly-wound, go-right-at-‘em Puma ST driving experience from the newcomer. 

“The Ford Performance team called on all of its experience developing the original Puma ST to deliver ST signature fun-to-drive without losing the practicality of our compact SUV, and our new Powershift derivative is even more versatile,” remarked Stefan Muenzinger, Ford Performance manager, Europe. “The multi-award-winning 1.0-litre EcoBoost engine is combined with a paddle-shift-operable, seven-speed, dual-clutch Ford Powershift transmission – fusing an energised driving experience and everyday usability.” 

Offering an ST-badged Puma with two-pedals was clearly the priority here, and Ford deserves some credit for taking the time to tweak its now venerable Ecoboost motor for the application - it would likely have found buyers with only the pre-existing 155hp to call upon. But the Powershift model is an additional reminder that more power is needed if you hope to live up to the badge when dealing with even small SUVs. The outgoing Fiesta, lest we forget, was still a giggle with just 140hp from the same engine, and didn’t need mild hybrid assistance to average 112g/km CO2. Those were the days. 


Author
Discussion

Jon_S_Rally

Original Poster:

4,469 posts

118 months

Wednesday 8th March 2023
quotequote all
Bit confused by this to be honest. Wasn't there a 1.0-litre mild hybrid version of the ST-Line already? Not sure this really deserves to be a full-blown ST. I assume they had to go down this route because the Powershift 'box wouldn't take the grunt from the 1.5-litre lump?

Regardless, with the Fiesta about to die, and the Focus not long for this world, I feel like Ford have basically culled all the cars that made them desirable. They'd better hope the SUV/crossover craze lasts, as they're going to have a lot of work to do if it doesn't.

HustleRussell

26,581 posts

190 months

Wednesday 8th March 2023
quotequote all
Sad day when I literally don't give a st about a new Ford warm hatch.

LuS1fer

43,538 posts

275 months

Wednesday 8th March 2023
quotequote all
Ford are determined to suck every gram of kudos out of the ST badge.

ST-Line, ST SUV and now this.

Is there a Transit ST yet?

Sad really.

fantheman80

2,651 posts

79 months

Wednesday 8th March 2023
quotequote all
Its a great commercial move by ford. I see loads of these, with the greatest respect, dropping off kids at my local junior school, but not many STs. For a few quid more than the ST-line but not as much as the full fat ST, you can tempt non petrol heads into the 'top of the range model.' Wont be able to make them quick enough

budgie smuggler

6,066 posts

189 months

Wednesday 8th March 2023
quotequote all
LuS1fer said:
Ford are determined to suck every gram of kudos out of the ST badge.

ST-Line, ST SUV and now this.

Is there a Transit ST yet?

Sad really.
Personally I'm fine with ST Line, in fact I owned a diesel ST Line X for a while when cars were in short supply during covid. It was alright TBH. Chassis felt decent and it had enough performance for a family run around.

However, calling this thing ST not ST Line is a bit sad.

GroundEffect

13,864 posts

186 months

Wednesday 8th March 2023
quotequote all
Those that have driven the two (1.5 and 1.0) on the same road, back to back, prefer the 1.0 auto.


Baldchap

9,629 posts

122 months

Wednesday 8th March 2023
quotequote all
Wasn't the 140 1.0 Ecoboost basically a time bomb? And the Powershift gearbox, wasn't it shockingly unreliable?

I'm sure this 170 Powershift will be fine though. laugh

MadDog1962

900 posts

192 months

Wednesday 8th March 2023
quotequote all
" twice the power-per-litre of a 2002 Focus ST170’ which is an odd claim to fame given that model’s famously anemic performance."

Really? 0-62 mph in 7.5 seconds and a maximum speed of 220km/h (~135mph) is anaemic? Since when?laugh

Runky

15 posts

52 months

Wednesday 8th March 2023
quotequote all
I've been put off this 3 pot motor.

My brother has it fitted in a Focus and the engine gave up when it was one month past it's warranty, only 30,000 kilometres on the clock. Ford contributed but it still cost him just over £3k. The main dealer said they had seen the same problem before.

A mates wife has the same engine fitted to an EcoSport. Just out of warranty, he took it to his usual indy who just laughed at him! The fitter said that he'd seen a few of these engines imploded.

JP.Racing

51 posts

97 months

Wednesday 8th March 2023
quotequote all
Oh Ford, what are you doing?! Leftover paint from the [actually decent] ST Editions thrown on a slushbox blob. I'm on my fourth ST and it looks like I won't be getting another anytime soon.

SNC84

2 posts

68 months

Wednesday 8th March 2023
quotequote all
As the owner of a Puma ST I'd suggest Ford put more effort into sorting out pretty dire build quality than introduce a warm hatch under a badge that is meant to mean performance. Can't wait to get rid of mine.

spreadsheet monkey

4,788 posts

257 months

Wednesday 8th March 2023
quotequote all
Baldchap said:
Wasn't the 140 1.0 Ecoboost basically a time bomb? And the Powershift gearbox, wasn't it shockingly unreliable?

I'm sure this 170 Powershift will be fine though. laugh
The latest Powershift auto is a Getrag 7 speed DCT. It's used elsewhere in Renaults and in certain variants of the BMW X1 (including my 2019 model). It's supposed to be a decent transmission.

The problems with the Ecoboost are from several years ago, and I think the latest engines are pretty reliable.

I'm surprised Ford is still using the "Ecoboost" and "Powershift" names, as neither has a great reputation from their early days.

SweptVolume

1,221 posts

123 months

Wednesday 8th March 2023
quotequote all
LuS1fer said:
Ford are determined to suck every gram of kudos out of the ST badge.

ST-Line, ST SUV and now this.

Is there a Transit ST yet?

Sad really.
Don't know, but a neighbour had a visitor the other day driving a brand new Hilux and it had GR badges on the front.

Considering how much effort Toyota have put into reinventing their performance arm as a legitimate enthusiasts' option, I find this watering down a tad surprising. Unless, of course, it's some kind of Toyota equivalent of the fabled Mitsubishi Pajero Evolution cool



Edited by SweptVolume on Wednesday 8th March 10:45

HazzaT

673 posts

75 months

Wednesday 8th March 2023
quotequote all
Jesus wept. In fairness, my folks have just got am auto Puma Titanium and it's sort of okay, drives quite nicely but the mild hybrid system feels very contrived. it bumps you off the line suprisingly rapidly and then when the 1.0 takes over you realise you're in near-1400kg car powered by a lawnmower engine. I can't see it being much better with a higher peak power, it'll still live and die by the turbo.

Also, when you open the bonnet you can see where they've just welded extra bits to the Fiesta bodyshell to make it taller and fatter.

Trebor1970

224 posts

50 months

Wednesday 8th March 2023
quotequote all
LuS1fer said:
Is there a Transit ST yet?

Sad really.
Kind of, there's a Transit Custom MS-RT.

Interestingly, as a Focus ST (MK3.5) owner, I occasionally get a nod off a fellow ST - Fiesta or Focus, but never off a Puma ST owner. That's not scientific but in my eyes shows the Puma is being brought by a different demographic.

georgeyboy12345

4,632 posts

65 months

Wednesday 8th March 2023
quotequote all
Ah, both the powerst and ecoboom wrapped up in an ugly, bloated, overweight package. What’s not to hate?

Zetec-S

6,920 posts

123 months

Wednesday 8th March 2023
quotequote all
MadDog1962 said:
" twice the power-per-litre of a 2002 Focus ST170’ which is an odd claim to fame given that model’s famously anemic performance."

Really? 0-62 mph in 7.5 seconds and a maximum speed of 220km/h (~135mph) is anaemic? Since when?laugh
I think it was to do with the gear rations in the ST170, meant it never felt as fast as it it should have?


As a fan of fast Fords since a kid, and a current owner of a Mk3.5 Focus ST, I have to say I can't see me rushing to buy another Ford any time soon. For me they've lost their way, they don't make anything which appeals to me now.

I think dropping the Focus and Fiesta is a mistake, they've spent decades building up these brands, loads of people buy them just because of the name. When my parents changed their Focus last year they knew they wanted a Fiesta, didn't need to test drive one as they'd decided in advance. Next time round I don't know what they'll get, maybe a Puma but they don't like SUV's so after 30+ years of driving Ford's they might well look elsewhere.

Ford seems to have put all their eggs in one basket, namely the Puma. I see loads of these about, a few people at work have them as company cars and rave about them. But I don't see so many other new Fords, the Kuga doesn't seem as popular and is up against a lot of more popular rivals. When the Fiesta and Focus end production what else is there?

Don Roque

18,290 posts

189 months

Wednesday 8th March 2023
quotequote all
What a disaster for Ford. They need to get back to making great cars and quickly but they seem to have no intention of that.

HustleRussell

26,581 posts

190 months

Wednesday 8th March 2023
quotequote all
I wonder what school mums will do when the seating position in a Ford Fiesta is just as high as that in their Range Rover?

Trebor1970

224 posts

50 months

Wednesday 8th March 2023
quotequote all
HustleRussell said:
I wonder what school mums will do when the seating position in a Ford Fiesta is just as high as that in their Range Rover?
The Puma seats are curiously low, more like the Fiesta it's based on, rather than like an SUV